Why doesn’t Taiwan have any World Heritage Sites? The answer is fairly clear. The list, currently comprising 878 sites in 145 countries, is compiled by UNESCO, part of the United Nations. And Taiwan, despite all its best efforts, still isn’t a member of the UN.
Even so, China — whose pressure is the main, indeed the only, reason Taiwan isn’t a UN member — hasn’t managed to include any Taiwan sites in its own listings, at least not yet. It has 37 sites of its own in this sumptuous official guide to all the current sites worldwide. The site nearest to Taiwan that the book contains is on the Ryukyu Islands — the “Gusuku Sites and Related Properties” — listed under Japan’s 14 entries.
China routinely gives weather forecasts for Taipei on its domestic TV services, and it would come as no surprise for it one day to succeed in including some Taiwan sites in its UNESCO listings. The procedure for inclusion is that UN member-states submit proposals and these are then vetted by UNESCO committees. But to date no Taiwan sites appear, under any national heading.
This is a huge pity. The criteria for inclusion are deliberately set very wide, with 10 categories. Essentially, though, there are two groupings — cultural or historic significance, and outstanding natural beauty. Taiwan could well get several such places accepted for inclusion.
The Nantou mountain area centering on Yushan (玉山) would easily qualify (China got its own Mount Sanqingshan National Park in Jiangxi Province included as recently as last year). So too would our many historic Aboriginal sites — one of UNESCO’s criteria is places that are “an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change.”
That having been said, The World’s Heritage remains a wonderful publication, either to read through, browse, or keep for reference. It lists its contents in order of acceptance by UNESCO, and the first was the Galapagos Islands (“a tossed salad of marine species”) in 1978. But the essential motive for such a collection came earlier, in the 1950s, when Egypt’s construction of the Aswan High Dam necessitated the moving of the unique and vast Abu Simbel temple complex, otherwise doomed to be drowned. This was successfully achieved after a worldwide fund-raising scheme, and the concept of numerous other sites all over the globe that needed to be preserved, if rarely so dramatically, was brought to the front of people’s minds.
Today Italy leads the list, with 43 sites. Spain has 40, France 33, Mexico 30, Japan 14, Indonesia seven, Malaysia (surely under-represented) three, and so on. The US has 20, and the UK 27.
Major absences, apart from Taiwan, are hard to catalogue. The English Lake District, though in little need of promotion, and hardly threatened, seems a strange omission. So does anything from Bali. Maybe the Indonesians are considering putting the entire island up for eventual admission.
But there’s no question of this book, comprehensive though it is, being a definitive or in any way a final listing. “Many sites of outstanding universal value have yet to be included in the List,” writes Koichiro Matsuura, Director-General of UNESCO, in his Forward.
This book is enormously stimulating of travel plans. How magnificent the Three Parallel Rivers of China’s Yunnan Protected Areas look, containing 15 such areas (though one wonders what that means in reality) in eight geographical clusters. Of the cities included here, Venice (“an incomparable series of architectural ensembles”) must be preeminent for anyone who’s ever seen it, and for me, Morocco’s Fez (whose Medina was included early on, in 1981) carries powerful memories. The primeval beech forests of the Carpathians (Slovakia and Ukraine) and the Norwegian fjords both look incredibly enticing.
And there’s no reason why Taiwan’s relative modernity — its Aboriginal settlements apart — should in any way exclude its many historic sites from consideration. Australia managed to have Sydney Opera House included in the List in 2007, for instance, hardly historic, and certainly not a natural phenomenon. China, of course, has very many sites of both historic and natural splendor, but Taiwan boasts the highest mountains in East Asia, still relatively unspoiled, as well as many urban sites displaying a fascinating history of migration and cross-cultural settlement.
“Interchange of values” is the first of UNESCO’s criteria for inclusion, and it was under this head that China got the historic center of Macau included in 2005. Under this head, Tainan would be ripe for inclusion, and even the small historic area of Hsinchu — the main point of entry for Chinese immigrants for centuries — might not be exempt from consideration.
All in all, this is a marvelous book, a fact that’s hardly surprising considering the riches it catalogues. It’s easy to use, with the sites listed in order of admission to the World Heritage List, but with detailed lists for each country, plus continent maps on which all the sites are located.
In short, from now on I couldn’t conceive of embarking on any foreign excursion, however brief, without consulting this book’s voluminous but colorful pages (there are more than 650 photos) as part of my travel preparations. But I’m fortunate in not needing any introduction to Taiwan’s own marvels. Other travelers, though, won’t be so lucky.
March 10 to March 16 Although it failed to become popular, March of the Black Cats (烏貓進行曲) was the first Taiwanese record to have “pop song” printed on the label. Released in March 1929 under Eagle Records, a subsidiary of the Japanese-owned Columbia Records, the Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) lyrics followed the traditional seven characters per verse of Taiwanese opera, but the instrumentation was Western, performed by Eagle’s in-house orchestra. The singer was entertainer Chiu-chan (秋蟾). In fact, a cover of a Xiamen folk song by Chiu-chan released around the same time, Plum Widow Missing Her Husband (雪梅思君), enjoyed more
Last week Elbridge Colby, US President Donald Trump’s nominee for under secretary of defense for policy, a key advisory position, said in his Senate confirmation hearing that Taiwan defense spending should be 10 percent of GDP “at least something in that ballpark, really focused on their defense.” He added: “So we need to properly incentivize them.” Much commentary focused on the 10 percent figure, and rightly so. Colby is not wrong in one respect — Taiwan does need to spend more. But the steady escalation in the proportion of GDP from 3 percent to 5 percent to 10 percent that advocates
A series of dramatic news items dropped last month that shed light on Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attitudes towards three candidates for last year’s presidential election: Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), Terry Gou (郭台銘), founder of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). It also revealed deep blue support for Ko and Gou from inside the KMT, how they interacted with the CCP and alleged election interference involving NT$100 million (US$3.05 million) or more raised by the
More than 100,000 people were killed in a single night 80 years ago yesterday in the US firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese capital. The attack, made with conventional bombs, destroyed downtown Tokyo and filled the streets with heaps of charred bodies. The damage was comparable to the atomic bombings a few months later in August 1945, but unlike those attacks, the Japanese government has not provided aid to victims and the events of that day have largely been ignored or forgotten. Elderly survivors are making a last-ditch effort to tell their stories and push for financial assistance and recognition. Some are speaking
RSS