This weekend it will be two years since the collapse of a shoddily constructed train station canopy in Serbia’s second-largest city, Novi Sad. The tragedy, killing 16 people, was swiftly attributed to state corruption and failures of regulation, sparking student-led protests across the country.
Some of those demonstrators dared to imagine that they could become the catalyst for a democratic revolution.
On Sunday, that was more or less what happened. After sustaining their protests and turning them into a political movement, the students resoundingly defeated former Serbian president Aleksandar Vucic’s autocratic government in a snap legislative poll called by the president himself. Their victory constitutes one of the most remarkable election outcomes in recent European history.
For well over a decade Vucic and his Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) have exerted a domineering grip over civil society and the media, ruling through a combination of cronyism, patronage and bullying authoritarianism. As a report by international observers confirmed on Monday, the Serbian government made full, unscrupulous use of such tactics to ensure there was no level playing field for the vote. That it was nevertheless routed by a leaderless movement of 20- and 30-somethings would have been noted across a continent in which youth protest is challenging political priorities.
As in Hungary, where a focus on corruption helped the opposition to unseat former Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban after 16 years in office, the students’ campaign for basic democratic renewal struck a deeper chord than perhaps even they thought possible. Posing the choice for voters as “Serbia or mafia?” they put forward a student list of civic candidates dominated by academics, but also featuring farmers and well-known athletes. A turnout of almost 70 percent — the highest in a Serbian election since the breakup of Yugoslavia in 1992 — delivered them a comfortable majority.
What comes next will necessarily be an experiment in doing things differently. By standing apart from established structures of politics, the student insurgents embodied a freshness of approach and won the trust of the public — including in rural areas presumed to be bastions of Vucic support. In the immediate future, the new government is likely to function as a kind of constituent assembly, dedicated primarily to cleaning up civil society and rolling back the abuses that saw Serbia plunge toward the bottom of European corruption rankings.
Politically, the priority would be to consolidate this domestic agenda by winning the forthcoming presidential election. which is due by late December. However, in the longer term there would be less straightforward debates to be had. Vucic’s defeat is good news for the western Balkans as a whole, where he has been a consistently disruptive presence. However, on foreign policy issues such as joining the EU and relations with Russia, opinion across the student movement is divided.
As a new government seeks to re-establish the rule of law and a properly functioning and accountable state, Brussels must do all it can to assist that process while outlining a plausible and attractive path to EU membership. Vucic’s Serbia, like Orban’s Hungary, became a soft autocracy where power was so entrenched that it was hard to imagine how it could be dislodged. However, now there are new and better possibilities. In extraordinary fashion, the students’ inspiring journey from principled protest to power has shown just what the art of politics can deliver.
Taiwan heads to the polls next month for local elections. Beneath the campaign ads lies a deeper question: What do we call this place and who gets to decide? In the pages of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), that question has been playing out across three centuries. The entries for “Formosa” and “Taiwan” chart an island’s journey from colonial fantasy to self-named reality. Names are rarely neutral; they are the first act of possession. Nowhere is this more evident than in the OED, where the two entries serve as a linguistic seismograph for one of the world’s most enduring geopolitical fault lines.
There are two space races that the democracies must win: one to deter military campaigns near Earth, and the other to secure positional deterrence on the Moon and beyond. The good news is that the US is engaged in both races, which will also benefit US allies and partners in Asia, including Taiwan. On Sept. 14, US Air Force Secretary Troy Meink disclosed, “...the US now has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action.” No details about these “space control weapons” have yet been disclosed. However, a graphic apparently issued by French Space Command and posted
Only 107,812 babies were born in Taiwan last year, barely half the number recorded in 2016. The nation is now a super-aged society, with more than one-fifth of its population aged 65 or older. The National Development Council forecast that the population could fall from an estimated 23.2 million this year to just 12.1 million in 2075. The decline in the working-age population would be even more severe. The number of people aged 15 to 64 is projected to plunge from an estimated 15.8 million this year to 5.1 million by 2075, a reduction of about 67 percent. By then, people
Taipei’s school lunch program has run into trouble yet again. This time, Shilin District’s (士林) Shihtung Elementary School (士東國小) was exposed by parents on social media for serving rotten, blackened pears. The incident once again sparked criticism about food safety in Taipei schools and the quality of the city’s free lunch policy. Free school lunches for all elementary and junior-high schools is a flagship policy announced by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) in January, but at the time it attracted criticism from other administrative regions. Since the policy’s official implementation last month, the city — which has the largest budget