The relocation of Taipei International Airport (Songshan Airport), which Taipei mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) proposed on Thursday, has been debated for years. Mayoral candidates have previously advocated preserving the site as a park and green space, which I would have no objection to. However, plans for the site to undergo intensive development would risk overloading the land’s carrying capacity and seriously exacerbate the severity of potential earthquakes.
While a major offshore megathrust earthquake would severely affect Taipei and New Taipei City, movement along the Shanchiao Fault (山腳斷層) could mean an earthquake or subsidence event taking place right underneath the city, pushing the capital toward the point of destruction beyond repair.
As extensive land consolidation in low-lying areas contributes to fault risks, one cannot assume that the Shanchiao Fault would remain inactive. Consider the current state of the Taipei Basin: It has been 50 years since land consolidation began in the low-lying areas of New Taipei City’s Sinjhuang (新莊) and Wugu (五股) districts; plans have been made to raise the ground level across Shezidao (社子島); extensive filling is under way for the Wenzizun (塭仔圳) development project scheduled for completion next year; and large-scale land reclamation also lies ahead for Guandu Plain’s agricultural area. If a major development project follows the relocation of Songshan Airport, it would inevitably mean further land consolidation projects.
What is particularly concerning is that all these development projects are concentrated in areas with elevations close to sea level, which is precisely where movement along the Shanchiao Fault could cause the basin to subside. Here, extensive landfilling reaching the equivalent of two stories in height increases stress on the fault’s seismogenic zone by approximately 1.2kg per square centimeter.
For reference, the “stress drop” associated with the change is shear stress on a fault after each rupture usually only amounts to several to several dozen kilograms per square centimeter. The weight of vast quantities of fill and subsequent development could therefore be enough to destabilize the Shanchiao Fault, triggering a major earthquake directly beneath the city. At the very least, it could substantially shorten the fault’s recurrence interval, bringing the next earthquake forward.
The last earthquake along the Shanchiao Fault occurred in 1694. In its aftermath, the basin subsided and its northwestern half was inundated, forming a 5m-deep lake. This became known as the Kangxi Taipei Lake. If this were to happen again, today’s Taipei Basin could suffer severe soil liquefaction and ground deformation, damaging drainage systems, rupturing utility pipelines and causing buildings to collapse. Even underground MRT and high-speed rail tunnels could sustain serious damage, making post-disaster reconstruction exceptionally difficult.
Given these circumstances, the central government should act quickly to regulate or even ban large-scale land consolidation and development in the low-lying areas of the Taipei Basin. Particular care should be taken in deciding how the land would be used following the relocation of Songshan airport. Reckless urban expansion should not become a force that raises the risk of a devastating earthquake directly beneath the city.
Lee Chyi-ti is a professor at National Central University’s Graduate Institute of Applied Geology.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The FBI on Sunday arrested Wanying “Heather” Chang (張婉瑩) on suspicion of surveiling the family of the son of President William Lai (賴清德) on behalf of China, an example of “transnational repression” to suppress dissent in Taiwan and abroad. Zhang, a 34-year old realtor in California, was arrested on charges of working as an unregistered agent for China. She and an accomplice were accused of taking photos and videos of Lai’s son and his family, and sending information about their whereabouts and license plates to Chinese officials. “The information could be used by China to gain leverage over the Taiwanese president
On Oct. 10, 1911, gunfire in Wuchang (武昌) shattered the stillness of late-Qing China. What began as a regional uprising quickly ignited a chain reaction across the empire, toppling a dynastic order that had endured for more than two millennia and ushering in one of Asia’s first republics — the Republic of China (ROC). From that moment, the 10th day of the 10th month became a date of epochal significance, not merely in Chinese history, but in the broader arc of Asia’s encounter with modernity. Yet today, as Taiwan marks Double Ten National Day, the holiday’s meaning has undergone a transformation
A few days ago, we left our breakfast midway to catch a glimpse of the fighter jets in formation. It was a spectacular sight. We knew it was part of practice drills for Double Ten National Day celebrations and reminded us of the Annual Republic day celebration in India. While channel surfing, I came across a news debate about immigration laws, where an academic asked a fellow panelist: “Why should we be interested in your point of view when you don’t even belong here?” That got me thinking. Was our enthusiasm about the upcoming Double Ten celebrations unwarranted? Was this
National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) president John Kao (高為元) was invited for a job interview in Hawaii just three days after being confirmed in May for a second term at NTHU. Academic and industrial leaders requested his resignation. In the US, university presidents serve at the pleasure of the university’s board of trustees or board of regents. Unless an employment contract explicitly protects them, they can be terminated at any time without cause under at-will employment doctrines. If the board finds out a president is interviewing elsewhere, it can legally terminate their presidency simply by citing a “loss of confidence” in their
RSS