The recent controversy surrounding a police raid on a gay bar on Saturday last week in Taipei’s Ximending (西門町) area flies directly in the face of the city government’s long-standing efforts to project an image of Taipei as a diverse and inclusive city. With its rainbow-themed public spaces and tourism marketing, Taipei has long been proud of its support for diverse communities. However, in light of this incident, it must be asked: Should a city’s inclusivity be measured by the number of rainbows on its streets, or by how the authorities actually treat LGBTQ people?
According to the Wanhua Precinct, police were investigating a case involving public indecency in accordance with the law. However, their conduct during the operation has drawn sharp criticism, with reports of patrons being handcuffed, ordered to squat and officers making inappropriate remarks. LGBTQ groups have called on the Taipei City Government to investigate the conduct of the operation and address the stigma and insecurity that the city’s queer venues have long faced.
It is the police’s duty to investigate and crack down on crime, and gay bars should not be treated as spaces beyond the reach of the law. Equally, however, standards regarding due process, human rights and dignity must not be weaker for cases involving LGBTQ establishments. The legal grounds for enforcement and whether its execution respects the principle of proportionality and the dignity of the public are two separate questions. They must both be seriously examined.
Taipei has over the past few years promoted rainbow tourism, but genuine inclusivity cannot exist only within the confines of tourism brochures and event stages. Whether LGBTQ communities receive the same respect as other citizens when it comes to police checks, searches or other exercises of state authority is the real measure of how far we have come on equal rights.
There is no need to rush on pronouncements of guilt. Instead, the Taipei City Government should release full footage from the operation to address the concerns raised. Any misconduct should be dealt with through accountability and corrective action.
The incident should also prompt a review of police training to prevent prejudice from influencing law enforcement. Taipei’s rainbows are decoration; they do not prove that equality has been achieved. When the events are over and the flags have been put away, the real test is whether the city’s LBGTQ communities can retain their full dignity when dealing with the authorities.
Ken is a social worker.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The FBI on Sunday arrested Wanying “Heather” Chang (張婉瑩) on suspicion of surveiling the family of the son of President William Lai (賴清德) on behalf of China, an example of “transnational repression” to suppress dissent in Taiwan and abroad. Zhang, a 34-year old realtor in California, was arrested on charges of working as an unregistered agent for China. She and an accomplice were accused of taking photos and videos of Lai’s son and his family, and sending information about their whereabouts and license plates to Chinese officials. “The information could be used by China to gain leverage over the Taiwanese president
During a tour of Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華) on Sept. 22, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) proposed a seemingly appealing urban-planning vision for the area: linking Xinfu Market (新富市場), East Sanshui Street Market (東三水街市場), Longshan Temple (龍山寺), Bopiliao Historical Block (剝皮寮歷史街區), Bangka Park (艋舺公園), the underground mall and surrounding commercial areas through neighborhood redevelopment and environmental improvements, while encouraging specialty and boutique business. It would create what Chiang called Taipei’s version of Omotesando — an upscale, tree-lined boulevard and shopping district in Tokyo — to attract young people and international tourists. The idea is not new. More than NT$200 million (US$6.28
National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) president John Kao (高為元) was invited for a job interview in Hawaii just three days after being confirmed in May for a second term at NTHU. Academic and industrial leaders requested his resignation. In the US, university presidents serve at the pleasure of the university’s board of trustees or board of regents. Unless an employment contract explicitly protects them, they can be terminated at any time without cause under at-will employment doctrines. If the board finds out a president is interviewing elsewhere, it can legally terminate their presidency simply by citing a “loss of confidence” in their
A few days ago, we left our breakfast midway to catch a glimpse of the fighter jets in formation. It was a spectacular sight. We knew it was part of practice drills for Double Ten National Day celebrations and reminded us of the Annual Republic day celebration in India. While channel surfing, I came across a news debate about immigration laws, where an academic asked a fellow panelist: “Why should we be interested in your point of view when you don’t even belong here?” That got me thinking. Was our enthusiasm about the upcoming Double Ten celebrations unwarranted? Was this
RSS