The early, intense heat wave sweeping across Europe is testing which systems can still cope — and forcing difficult questions about whether to endure more extreme temperatures or invest billions in adapting to a hotter future.
The world’s fastest-warming continent is not approaching a single climate tipping point, scientists say. Instead, Europe is crossing a cascade of smaller thresholds all at once: the temperatures at which classrooms close, hospitals come under strain, power grids falter, farm soils dry out and rivers become too warm to cool nuclear reactors.
Temperatures in Europe have risen by about 0.56°C per decade over the past 30 years, more than twice the global average. Against that steadily warming backdrop, familiar weather patterns such as a slow-moving ridge of high pressure can intensify into a deadly heat dome that researchers say is likely the most severe ever recorded.
Of course, large patches of the world experience even hotter climates, including in developed countries. However, Europe’s infrastructure, much of it constructed centuries ago, was not built to withstand modern heat waves.
On parts of the continent this week, the heat has made it uncomfortable to sleep soundly, ride a train, attend a concert, work in a factory, take a test, or have a pint while watching FIFA World Cup matches. Some of these activities have been limited, canceled or banned amid punishing temperatures.
“We are going to need to make some very significant changes in the way we live,” University of Reading climate scientist Ed Hawkins said.
Europe’s governments and businesses are getting an early look at how much money it would take to retrofit daily life for hotter summers.
Heat waves in 2022, when London experienced its first 40°C temperature, cost the city £1.5 billion (US$1.98 billion), the mayor’s office said in a new report this week. Upgrading the roughly 1 million homes at high risk of overheating would cost somewhere between £9 billion and £45 billion — a scale of spending that would require private investment.
Electricite de France SA is planning to spend 8.7 billion euros (US$9.91 billion) by 2040 for improvements across its 57 nuclear reactor sites, along with hundreds of dams across the country, to ward off heat waves, droughts, floods and severe storms. Those upgrades include new cooling towers for some reactors forced to limit generation when rivers used to ferry heat from the plant get too hot.
Scientists say those costs reflect a broader shift ahead. Europe is no longer just responding to hotter days, but would need to redesign for hotter nights, warmer waters and drier soils.
Rising temperatures fuel weather feedback loops that can “charge up” drought by increasing evaporation, causing soils to dry faster and aridity to worsen, said University of Edinburgh climate scientist Gabi Hegerl said.
“A question that is hard to address is what is the likelihood that severe extremes trigger changes that are hard to reverse,” she said, citing damage to vegetation, worsening wildfire conditions, and the loss of ice and permafrost.
That is why the comparison with Europe’s historic heat waves only goes so far. Phil Jones, a climate scientist who began his career during the UK’s historically hot, dry summer of 1976, said today’s heat is more humid and less likely to ease overnight.
“The nighttime minimums are much higher, making sleep more difficult,” he said.
In the UK and France, where many homes lack air-conditioning, that turns heat from an outdoor hazard into a 24/7 health risk.
Hawkins said that adaptation would increasingly mean active cooling in homes, workplaces, schools and hospitals — a shift that would raise new questions and tensions about cost, energy demand and inequality.
Those in poorly insulated homes, apartment blocks or neighborhoods with little green space would face the harshest risks, even as wealthier households are better able to cool themselves, he said.
That makes Europe’s heat challenge physical and political, he said.
The danger is that adaptation remains piecemeal while its heat problems become even more systemic.
“Our society and the infrastructure on which it’s based is built for the climate of the past,” Hawkins said. “It’s not built for the climate of now, and certainly not built for the climate of the future.”
The post-Cold War belief that sovereignty, international law and economic interdependence would shield smaller states from great-power coercion is steadily eroding. Across the world, major powers are once again thinking in terms of strategic neighborhoods, buffer zones and spheres of influence. Geography is reasserting itself as a central determinant of security. For Taiwan, this shift is not merely an academic debate. It is an existential challenge. Situated just 180km off the coast of communist China, democratic Taiwan occupies a position that Beijing increasingly regards as lying within its natural sphere of influence. As China’s military power expands and its ambitions grow more
It is the biggest conundrum in the world economy right now: How has China managed to go on an oil detox? As my colleague Javier Blas has written, its sharply declining appetite for petroleum is probably the single-biggest factor that has kept the crude market balanced since the Strait of Hormuz closed. The perception that China is an opaque and secretive market adds to the mystery. Perhaps the Chinese government has been releasing barrels from hidden underground stockpiles, or sparking up secret chemical plants? A close look at the reams of official data available suggests a more humdrum explanation. Public
Earlier this month, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) called for the abolition of the Control Yuan, suggesting that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party caucuses in the Legislative Yuan should reject all nominees to effectively freeze the institution before pursuing a constitutional amendment to abolish it. However, KMT legislators are yet to raise a constitutional amendment proposal and KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) has made it clear that abolishing the Control Yuan is not among the party’s current priorities. Chiang, who studied law in the US, has shown his own lack of understanding of constitutional law, and
On June 11, China barred Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro Jr and his family from entering mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau, and forbade Chinese firms and citizens from conducting business with them. As an instrument, the measure is close to meaningless. Teodoro had already made clear he had no intention of setting foot in China. Its meaning lies elsewhere. This is the first time Beijing has sanctioned a sitting cabinet minister of a country it diplomatically recognizes, according to the American Enterprise Institute, and the target is the most outspoken critic of Chinese conduct in the Marcos