The Mataian River (馬太鞍溪) barrier lake burst into Hualien County’s Guangfu Township (光復) on Tuesday, causing floodwaters to pour onto Dunhou Road, Fozu Street and other areas of the town, resulting in a major tragedy.
Before the disaster struck, the central government had issued several alerts for Hualien County — four “red” landslide alerts, 102 “yellow” landslide alerts and four “yellow” alerts for large-scale collapses — through the Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency, the Central Weather Administration and the Water Resources Agency. Data from the Central Emergency Operations Center showed an abnormal rise in water levels at the Mataian River barrier lake, indicating an imminent risk of overflow and prompting an evacuation order for more than 8,000 people.
However, the local government failed to implement the order in time. Hualien County Commissioner Hsu Chen-wei (徐榛蔚) was abroad. Although the county government had received the warnings, it neglected to initiate proper protocol — it merely issued hasty instructions for residents to “move to the second floor,” without providing any supporting measures. When the flood hit, local residents were left with nothing but grassroots notifications and volunteer efforts, forced to face the floodwaters head on.
In contrast, the local government demonstrated an astonishing capacity for mobilization during July’s recall vote. Hualien County recorded a voter turnout of 55.23 percent — one of the highest in the country. The number of votes opposing the recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) exceeded those in favor. In Guangfu Township alone, nearly 3,000 out of 10,000 eligible voters were mobilized to vote against the recall.
This highlights a stark contrast. When votes are needed, officials go door to door urging people to head to the polls, calling out names one by one, but when the floodwaters hit, they neglected to mobilize and execute evacuation orders.
During the recall campaign, the Hualien County Government distributed emergency evacuation and first aid kits, treating them as symbols of protection and resource commitment. Yet when a real disaster struck, how many lives were saved by those emergency kits? Efforts to counter the recall were successful, but it was people’s lives and property that did not make it through.
All the more ironic is that the county government enthusiastically promoted the kits, praising them as part of its “disaster preparedness,” but they turned out to be little more than propaganda. When floodwaters surged into alleys and elderly people were trapped on the ground floor, the kits had long been swept away. The ability to mobilize residents to vote — yet not to evacuate — exposes failures in governance and misplaced values of those in power.
After the disaster, Fu attempted to shift the blame onto the central government, claiming that directions were insufficient and the warnings unclear. However, the warnings were explicit — the responsibility for carrying out evacuation orders, supplying resources and arranging shelters lies with the local government.
If the Hualien County Government cannot even ensure that every household is notified and well-prepared, or that residents on upper floors could survive until the floodwaters recede, then is its assessment of the value of lives versus votes not extremely misguided?
Shih Wen-yi is a former deputy director-general of the Centers for Disease Control.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No