The call for justice, fair treatment and protection under the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) was echoed at a rally on Thursday last week, when hundreds of migrant workers gathered in Taipei. Migrant workers from various countries and sectors urged the government to strengthen protections for all, particularly for domestic workers, who remain excluded from protection under the labor law.
On the one hand, the protest initiated by cross-border workers stands as a testament to Taiwan’s commitment to democratic values, particularly freedom of expression and the right to unionize, rights that are often denied in other labor-receiving countries.
This is hardly surprising, given Taiwan’s consistent ranking as the top democracy in Asia. Indeed, only two countries in the region qualified as full democracies: Taiwan and Japan, the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index for last year showed.
On the other hand, the demonstration also raised concerns about the depth of that democratic commitment, particularly whether the voices of migrant workers truly matter. The issues they highlighted have persisted for years, yet the government has done little to address them, or even dismissed them as non-issues.
Migrant workers and non-governmental organizations have long campaigned for the rights of so-called blue-collar workers, many of whom remain excluded from protection under the Labor Standards Act, do not have regular days off, and continue to face systemic discrimination.
A massive gap between the government and migrant workers’ concerns is also reflected in the country’s long-term retention policy, known as the Mid-Level Technical Worker scheme, introduced in 2022. This arrangement allows qualified migrant workers to remain in Taiwan without a time limit. They are also entitled to higher salaries and are eligible to apply for permanent residency after five years. Government officials firmly believe that the policy would improve their well-being and working conditions, as it offers a career path for foreign laborers.
However, this policy is not what migrant workers are looking for. What they seek is the abolition of the 12-year work limit — and 14 years for care workers — which they view as unfair. The long-term retention policy was not designed with migrant workers in mind.
Consequently, not only do the promised benefits remain largely unattainable, but the policy also risks worsening their already precarious working conditions by introducing new problems.
This raises an important question: as a democratic role model in Asia, should the government not take migrant workers’ voices into consideration when designing policies that affect them?
There are several reasons that Taiwan cannot turn a blind eye to migrant workers’ aspirations.
First, the country’s dependence on them is expected to increase significantly due to labor shortages and a rapidly aging society. Taiwanese aged 65 or older are projected to make up 41 percent of the population by 2060, the National Development Council has said.
While the demand for care workers continues to grow, many local workers are reluctant to take on such roles due to their association with so-called dirty, dangerous and demeaning jobs — positions that neither offer a promising career path, nor competitive wages.
Labor shortages also continue to haunt Taiwan’s semiconductor sector, a flagship industry that has long served as the backbone of the country’s economy.
This situation should serve as a wake-up call for the government, signaling that the labor crisis would not only affect non-professional workers, but also skilled and professional workers.
Second, Taiwan’s positive image is a major driving factor attracting migrant workers to the country. In an interview, a migrant worker who has lived in Hualien for more than 10 years told me that she had previously worked as a domestic helper in Saudi Arabia.
At the time, she had never even heard of Taiwan, but her employer in Saudi Arabia told her that if she ever worked there, she would be treated fairly and her rights would be respected. Looking back, she said her employer was right — and as a result, she now enjoys working in Taiwan.
However, that sentiment might be difficult for many long-term residents of Taiwan to reconcile with reality. Discrimination against migrant workers still occurs openly in the country.
Many, particularly those employed as caregivers, are routinely tasked not only with elder care, but also with running errands, tending shops, or maintaining their employers’ gardens. Nevertheless, this kind of testimony should serve as a stimulus for Taiwan to improve the working conditions of its migrant workers.
These conversations highlight the importance of non-economic factors in attracting migrant workers to Taiwan. In today’s globalized world, Taiwan should leverage this advantage — hoping that migrant workers would share their positive experiences online, rather than turning their precarious working conditions into viral content. A reputation for fair treatment and dignity at work could encourage more prospective workers to consider Taiwan as a destination.
Last, to remain competitive with other labor-receiving countries, Taiwan must reinforce its democratic identity in practice, not just in rhetoric.
Among Indonesian migrant worker communities, there is a saying — if not a stereotype — about labor destinations. Japan or South Korea is ideal for those seeking higher wages and willing to endure a lengthy pre-departure process; Singapore is chosen for its geographic proximity, albeit with more limited freedoms; Saudi Arabia appeals to Muslims seeking closeness to holy sites, but comes with harsh working conditions; and countries such as Canada attract migrants with the promise of permanent residency and citizenship.
Put differently, every country has its own advantages and shortcomings, shaped by distinct political and social contexts. However, taking foreign workers’ concerns into account could serve as Taiwan’s bargaining strength to outweigh the advantages offered by other countries. In doing so, Taiwan can position itself as a country that genuinely humanizes its migrant workers across sectors.
How Taiwan treats its foreign workers can bolster its claim to moral leadership in Asia — especially as it seeks greater international visibility and legitimacy. Taiwan does not need to choose between being efficient and being fair.
By listening to migrant workers’ voices, it can do both — strengthening its democratic identity while addressing its economic challenges. In doing so, Taiwan can set a regional benchmark for a worker-centered democracy.
Vanny El Rahman is a doctoral candidate and research assistant in Asia-Pacific Regional Studies at National Dong Hwa University.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS