The US-led global order as we have known it is gone. As the tectonic plates of geopolitics continue to shift beneath us, the challenge for Europe is to keep its institutions alive and prevent the world from returning to an era of might makes right — where power accrues to strongman leaders in Washington, Moscow and Beijing.
Rising to this challenge requires a fundamental reconsideration of long-held assumptions and beliefs. Clinging to old orthodoxies is not an option. Europeans cannot preserve democracy and their way of life with soft power alone. We must dispense with entrenched taboos and relearn the language of hard power. That is the only way to deter and defend against those who directly threaten our values and interests.
Yes, since US President Donald Trump’s return to power, hundreds of billions of euros in new spending have been earmarked for defense. However, these commitments are not enough. Spending 2 percent of GDP on defense was a reasonable ambition for NATO in 2014, when the US still played the role, however reluctantly, of global policeman. Those days are gone. Merely to keep pace with Russia’s military development, Europe must at least double its investment in defense.
Illustration: Mountain People
Indeed, I would go much further and say Europe should aim for 4 percent by 2028. Incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s ambitions for their own countries must be replicated across the continent.
Bigger armies and more equipment would deter direct attacks, but guns and tanks are only one part of the equation. If Europe’s extra spending is confined to military procurement, it would miss an opportunity to spark its own high-tech revolution. Technological innovation is what underpins US and Chinese hard power. From artificial intelligence and quantum computing to critical infrastructure and biotech, Europe is at risk of ossifying as the major powers sprint further ahead. In this scenario, our strategic dependencies on the US and China would only increase.
To defend the rules-based system, we must rethink the composition of our community. While old formats like the G7 could still serve an important purpose, we would need new ways of convening like-minded democracies. A coalition of such democracies — a D7 — could build new tools to promote open trade and economic cooperation, defense partnerships, intelligence-sharing, and access to critical minerals. They could even create new security arrangements that cover cyberkinetic attacks and economic coercion by major powers, akin to an economic version of NATO’s Article 5 mutual-defense provision.
To that end, the EU should work closely with traditional partners — such as the UK — and seek even closer relations with Canada, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and Australia. It should also explore new ways to collaborate with India, a democracy whose GDP has doubled in the past decade, putting it on track to become the world’s third-biggest economy before the end of this decade. The point is not to replace the US, but to ensure that Europe would remain resilient with or without its support.
For too long, Europe has relied on cheap Russian energy, cheap Chinese goods, and cheap US security and technology. This naive dependency is no longer an option. In addition to mobilizing fiscal resources for defense and technology, Europe must forge a new social contract.
Although we should not abandon what makes us European, we do need to revisit some tenets of the old welfare state. Freedom is not free. European leaders must be honest and open about the challenge we face, and about what it requires of us. The solutions would not all be popular, but we must remember that we have entered an era of crisis. Europeans must be equipped with the skills and resources to fend for themselves. We can learn a lot from the Ukrainians and the Taiwanese about building resilience and paying the price for freedom.
Each year, I convene the Copenhagen Democracy Summit under my Alliance of Democracies Foundation. When I created the foundation in 2017, it was my long-held belief that the US would and must remain at the center of a global democratic alliance. Now, we must prepare for a world in which the US is not only unreliable, but even adversarial and expansionist.
New circumstances demand new strategies. Defending democracy is not a spectator sport. We will have to make some sacrifices, because the alternative is unimaginably awful. Europe has an opportunity to assume the mantle of leader of the free world. Our descendants will not forgive us if we fail to seize it.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, a former NATO secretary-general and former prime minister of Denmark, is founder of the Alliance of Democracies Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS