In an era when space is a contested frontier — crowded with satellites, ambition and geopolitics — Taiwan’s pursuit of a cosmic presence is a story less about conquest and more about survival. Unlike the flashy triumphs of the US or China’s militarized orbit, Taiwan’s journey is a quiet rebellion, blending industrial savvy with a defiance of its diplomatic exile.
As of last month, the Taiwan Space Agency (TASA) was charging ahead with a NT$25 billion (US$764.41 million) plan to launch four low Earth orbit satellites by 2029 — a “Taiwan Starlink” that is already sparking chatter on X.
That is not just about fast Internet; it is a lifeline for a democracy under pressure, a way to secure communications in a neighborhood where China’s shadow looms large.
China’s space machine, fueled by more than US$11 billion annually, churns out stations, lunar probes and anti-satellite weapons — tools of dominance that could zero in on Taiwan’s fledgling assets during any flare-up. Locked out of UN space talks at Beijing’s insistence, Taiwan cannot negotiate orbital slots or lunar rules, leaving it sidelined in a game it is forced to play anyway.
Yet, TASA is betting big: Those satellites promise optical links — faster and safer than radio waves — and 6G integration, thrusting Taiwan into the future of space tech.
It is a hedge against coercion, a way to say: “We’re here,” in a domain China wants to own. That is not just science — it is sovereignty, a middle finger to exclusion dressed up as innovation.
Taiwan’s edge lies in its tech DNA. Semiconductors, optics and materials — it is the unsung hero of the satellite supply chain, ready to churn out tiny, tough components for a miniaturized space race. The “Taiwan Starlink” could turn that into a global calling card, a democratic foil to China’s top-down control, maybe even become a lunar supplier for solar panels or artificial intelligence navigation.
However, the catch is brutal: no launch pads. Last year’s “Mountain Sparrow-T1A” flop, on Japan’s KAIROS rocket, was not sabotage, but it screamed vulnerability — Taiwan’s dreams ride on someone else’s wings, and politics can clip them fast. China’s sway over allies and norms only tightens the noose, freezing Taiwan out of lunar talks just as the moon becomes the next economic frontier.
Space sustainability is where Taiwan could flip the script, and it is worth digging into. With 36,000-plus debris chunks clogging orbits, the stakes are high — collisions trash billion-dollar assets and no one is cleaning up fast enough. Taiwan is already nodding at this with deorbit tech, but it could go further: active debris removal, such as nets or lasers, or lifecycle rules that force satellites to burn up responsibly.
TASA’s small scale is an asset here — nimble enough to test ideas big players would not touch, credible enough to pitch them to allies. The original piece hinted that was soft power, and it is spot-on: in a cosmos choking on junk, Taiwan could lead a cleanup, earning a seat at the table it has been denied. That is not just green — it is strategic, a way to shape rules without a UN badge.
The future is a tightrope. Nail 2029 and Taiwan gets a secure grid, a tech halo and maybe a lunar foothold — proof it can thrive despite the squeeze. Botch it, and China’s got an opening to pounce.
Partnerships — with Japan’s launch savvy, US tech or scrappy Baltic deals — could weave Taiwan into the supply chain, while sustainability chops amplify its voice. The original saw this as resilience meeting opportunity, and it is dead right: Taiwan is not just playing catch-up — it is crafting a space identity that is agile, principled and damn useful. In a sky full of noise, its quiet grit might just echo loudest.
Jack Huang is a research fellow of the UN based in Taipei.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS