In an era of gray zone conflicts, information warfare and escalating geopolitical tensions, the security challenges we face are no longer confined to traditional military confrontations. From Chinese military aircraft surrounding Taiwan, espionage and infiltration, disinformation campaigns, and the conflicts in Ukraine and Middle East, to US-China tech and tariff wars, and the economic risks that come with supply chain issues — national security has long permeated our daily lives.
Although the Ministry of National Defense published the All-Out Defense Contingency Handbook (全民國防應變手冊), higher education curriculums still lack a systemic understanding of and proper training on national security and risk literacy.
Over the past few years, there have been multiple espionage cases involving the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), exposing deep and diversified infiltration methods across various sectors. We have also witnessed Chinese People’s Liberation Army military exercises, as the CCP continuously harasses the maritime territories and airspace surrounding Taiwan. The Internet has become the primary stage for manipulating public discourse and sowing social division — from COVID-19 pandemic rumors and “united front” election interference to economic sanctions and supply chain vulnerabilities — all those issues highlight the public’s inability to identify risks and form collective responses.
When faced with such a high-risk environment, the role of education is increasingly vital. We must have modern citizens who possess risk identification skills and information literacy, and understand their civic responsibilities — technical expertise based on academic knowledge alone is not enough. Awareness of national and territorial security, and risk literacy should be integrated into the core competencies of higher-education curriculums as soon as possible.
General education courses at universities should cover interdisciplinary topics such as cognitive warfare, information security, information analysis, economic resilience and civic responsibility.
At the same time, case studies could be integrated to offer simulations and scenario-based teaching, addressing topics such as natural disasters, man-made incidents, risks to critical infrastructure and response strategies — it could also include simulations for responding to tariffs.
Teaching resources should be integrated and faculty training bolstered, so students could develop risk awareness through case discussions and public participation.
National security has never been exclusive to the military or government — it inseparable from the lives of every citizen. Cultivating a generation of youth who are able to think critically, identify threats, and respond in a calm and collected manner is the foundation for defending our democratic society.
In the wake of diversifying and increasingly complex national security threats, general education should focus on more than just cultural appreciation and philosophical reflection — it must become the first line of defense for Taiwan’s national resilience.
Tsai Yu-ming is an assistant professor in the School of Liberal Education at Shih Chien University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS