In an era of gray zone conflicts, information warfare and escalating geopolitical tensions, the security challenges we face are no longer confined to traditional military confrontations. From Chinese military aircraft surrounding Taiwan, espionage and infiltration, disinformation campaigns, and the conflicts in Ukraine and Middle East, to US-China tech and tariff wars, and the economic risks that come with supply chain issues — national security has long permeated our daily lives.
Although the Ministry of National Defense published the All-Out Defense Contingency Handbook (全民國防應變手冊), higher education curriculums still lack a systemic understanding of and proper training on national security and risk literacy.
Over the past few years, there have been multiple espionage cases involving the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), exposing deep and diversified infiltration methods across various sectors. We have also witnessed Chinese People’s Liberation Army military exercises, as the CCP continuously harasses the maritime territories and airspace surrounding Taiwan. The Internet has become the primary stage for manipulating public discourse and sowing social division — from COVID-19 pandemic rumors and “united front” election interference to economic sanctions and supply chain vulnerabilities — all those issues highlight the public’s inability to identify risks and form collective responses.
When faced with such a high-risk environment, the role of education is increasingly vital. We must have modern citizens who possess risk identification skills and information literacy, and understand their civic responsibilities — technical expertise based on academic knowledge alone is not enough. Awareness of national and territorial security, and risk literacy should be integrated into the core competencies of higher-education curriculums as soon as possible.
General education courses at universities should cover interdisciplinary topics such as cognitive warfare, information security, information analysis, economic resilience and civic responsibility.
At the same time, case studies could be integrated to offer simulations and scenario-based teaching, addressing topics such as natural disasters, man-made incidents, risks to critical infrastructure and response strategies — it could also include simulations for responding to tariffs.
Teaching resources should be integrated and faculty training bolstered, so students could develop risk awareness through case discussions and public participation.
National security has never been exclusive to the military or government — it inseparable from the lives of every citizen. Cultivating a generation of youth who are able to think critically, identify threats, and respond in a calm and collected manner is the foundation for defending our democratic society.
In the wake of diversifying and increasingly complex national security threats, general education should focus on more than just cultural appreciation and philosophical reflection — it must become the first line of defense for Taiwan’s national resilience.
Tsai Yu-ming is an assistant professor in the School of Liberal Education at Shih Chien University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS