Friday was Children’s Day and insightful people recognize that children are the future leaders of our nation. The declining quality and quantity of children are cause of concern. Are people aware of the state of today’s children?
The Child Welfare League Foundation’s (兒福聯盟) annual survey on children’s leisure and entertainment showed that 79 percent of elementary-school students and 83 percent of middle-school students kids spend most of their leisure time immersed in online worlds. That means prolonged sitting, which leads to less in physical activity — a drop from nearly 60 percent of students in elementary school to just 48 percent in middle school.
The WHO recommends that children and adolescents do “at least an average of 60 minutes per day of moderate to vigorous-intensity physical activity, across the week” — however, fewer than 20 percent of Taiwanese children meet that standard.
Keeping your eyes glued to your phone has countless disadvantages, such as nearsightedness and prolonged cervical flexion, or forward head posture. Exercise, on the other hand, has numerous benefits, promoting the healthy growth of the muscular and the skeletal systems. Lack of exercise can lead to developmental delays and issues with motor coordination, attention span and brain development, which could also negatively impact self-esteem.
The Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Environment, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, and others should work together to bring children outdoors by implementing measures such as establishing more recreational sports locations with less air pollution. In the past, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government issued “sports stimulus vouchers” (動滋券). Perhaps in the future, it could issue “family sports vouchers.”
A team from the National Taiwan University (NTU) Children and Family Research Center on Wednesday published the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Family Database: Taiwanese Family and Youth Rights Index 2024 Comparison Report, which said that the suicide rate for young Taiwanese has increased from 4.5 per 100,000 people in 2021 to 7 per 100,000 people in 2023. The report also said that with the rise of social media, descriptions of self-harm spread more easily among peers.
Celebrities also have a stronger impact on the youth. The Taiwanese Society of Suicidology said that the top three causes of suicide among adolescents are depression, relationship issues and family problems — which account for 41 percent, 30 percent and 21 percent respectively.
Adolescence — a show about a 13-year-old boy arrested on suspicion of a horrifying crime — recently gained popularity, with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaking about it in parliament and backing a Netflix initiative to stream the series for free in schools. Psychologists say adolescence is a time when people seek validation from others, so the way peers perceive us strongly affects our sense of self-worth.
The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco is a famous US tourist spot and a suicide hotspot. Authorities have started the installation of a net as a deterrent, which has already decreased the suicide rate at the bridge by more than 50 percent. Psychologists say suicide is often a split-second, impulsive decision. Installing such barriers provides a buffer, allowing individuals a moment to reconsider.
As our environment becomes increasingly complex, adults must put more effort in guiding children toward physical and mental well-being.
Lin Ji-shing is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then