China on Tuesday, April Fool’s Day, began two-day joint-force military exercises around Taiwan, painting them as a “severe warning and forceful containment against Taiwan independence.” However, the exercises have again proven the country increasingly showcasing its military muscles to be a true “troublemaker.”
Without prior notice, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command launched large-scale exercises codenamed “Strait Thunder-2025A,” deploying aircraft, drones and naval vessels including the Shandong aircraft carrier, as well as armed militia in the air and waters around Taiwan. The PLA claimed the military exercises were practice for precision strikes and a blockade to “close in on Taiwan from all directions.”
Not surprisingly, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office again stated that the maneuvers were directed at Taiwan’s “separatist” activities, this time referring to President William Lai (賴清德) recently designating China as a “foreign hostile force,” and announcing 17 measures to counter Chinese espionage and influence operations.
Along with its military buildup, China has in recent years significantly increased the frequency of intrusions across the median line of the Taiwan Strait and launched arbitrary military exercises aimed at Taiwan. Since the week-long military exercises after then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan in 2022, China has conducted at least six large-scale exercises around Taiwan.
Most of those maneuvers were conducted under the pretext of deterring “Taiwan independence forces,” and are used to press the Chinese Communist Party’s claims of sovereignty over Taiwan, which it has never ruled. They are part of China’s strategy to establish a new normal to alter the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait and create the illusion that Taiwan is part of China.
Those moves are also used to showcase China’s military muscle domestically and internationally. They serve as propaganda to solidify internal support amid China’s domestic troubles, and act as intimidation against international powers blocking China’s expansionism, as evidenced by drills near Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and in the South China Sea.
The “Strait Thunder-2025A” drill began weeks after Lai’s “17 measures” announcement, but right after the end of US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s first official visit to Asia, where he met with his counterparts in Japan and the Philippines, and pledged that “America is committed to sustaining robust, ready and credible deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, including across the Taiwan Strait.”
Such commitment is demonstrated in a new agreement between Japan and the US on coproduction of air-to-air missiles and an announcement of the deployment of more missile systems and F-16 jets to the Philippines to counter regional security risks.
The Washington Post simultaneously reported on a leaked internal Pentagon memo, which directs the US military to prioritize deterring a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, while withdrawing from other regions including the Middle East and Europe. The memo also iterated China is “the Department’s [of Defense] sole pacing threat.”
The exercises carry a strategic message of intimidation toward the US and its Asian allies for their anti-China efforts, as well as a diplomatic warning to the US ahead of a reported upcoming summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
China’s blatant military provocations have repeatedly highlighted the country to be the biggest “troublemaker” undermining regional peace and the international order. Going against China’s goals, such coercive moves have not only turned Taiwanese sentiment further against China, but also raise levels of anti-China discontent internationally and stimulate more regional countermeasures.
An April Fool’s Day exercise might end up to have been a most unwise move by China.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then