Thomson Reuters Foundation, BERLIN
For many LGBTQ+ Germans, Sunday’s elections are no longer about winning new rights; the best-case scenario now is just to hang on to any hard-won gains and ensure life does not get worse.
“They’re talking about revoking the trans self-determination law only three months after it entered into force. It’s absurd,” said Jojo Ludwig, a social media creator who last year was legally recognized as non-binary — neither male nor female.
Ludwig, 26, is one of thousands of trans Germans who have changed, or applied to change, gender and name under new self-ID laws, simply by declaring the switch at a local registry.
Previously they might have waited years, paid thousands of euros and faced questions from psychiatrists — about their sexuality and even their preferred underwear — before getting the go-ahead to alter their documents.
“The self-determination law gave me a lot of hope,” Ludwig told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in a phone interview from their home in Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
“I can finally live as the person I really am, and my identity documents say it,” they said.
However, now they fear the federal election on Sunday risks roiling all that, ushering in a new era of repression and prejudice.
Indeed many gay and trans activists interviewed by the Thomson Reuters Foundation fear the country is about to perform a 180-degree turn on LGBTQ+ rights when voters choose a new parliament this month.
Polls place the conservative Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) bloc first with 29 to 30 percent of the votes, followed by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which could secure about 20 to 21 percent, becoming — for the first time — the No. 2 party in the Bundestag, the lower house of the German parliament.
CDU leader Friedrich Merz — Germany’s likely next chancellor — has repeatedly ruled out forming a coalition government with the far-right party.
However, he recently shattered a taboo against working with the AfD when he pushed a migration resolution through parliament with the help of the far-right, breaking the so-call “firewall.”
That collaboration has let a dangerous genie out of the bottle, activists say, and they worry the repercussions could spread well beyond the sphere of LGBTQ+ rights.
“Whoever does it once, does it twice and three times,” said Andre Lehmann, board member at Germany’s LGBTQ+ umbrella group LSVD. “It’s not only a threat for LGBTI people in Germany, but for many, many people in this country, and for democracy as a whole.”
Despite the fact its candidate for chancellor is openly lesbian, AfD has become the loudest voice against LGBTQ+ rights in parliament, and even filed a motion to repeal same-sex marriage and adoption in 2017.
The party’s election manifesto calls for minors to be protected from what it calls “the trans cult, early sexualization and gender ideology.”
Among other plans, AfD wants to ban gender-affirming care, such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy, for trans minors.
It also wants to revoke last year’s self-identification law, cut funding for the “indoctrination of children and young people” and end “woke ideology-based development projects” abroad.
While the far-right party alone would likely not have enough seats to push these demands forward, many fear the recent collaboration on migration could see the CDU/CSU joining AfD to pass new LGBTQ+ rights restrictions nationally — just as they have already done at the state level.
Many of AfD’s LGBTQ-related demands overlap with those of the conservatives, be it reversing the trans self-determination law or restricting the use of inclusive language and gender-affirming care for minors.
“German politics is at a crossroads. Some parties are not only trying to freeze the status quo as before, but they also seek to take given rights away,” said Constantin Wurthmann, a political scientist at the University of Mannheim who researches LGBTQ+ politics.
“From my perspective, I don’t see that the queer community and the rest of the population understand what’s really happening right now, and what consequences might arise from this election,” he said.
For many LGBTQ+ Germans, this election is not just a matter of what could be lost, but also about what other reforms might be delayed — again — as national politics shift to the right.
When it took power in 2021, a coalition between the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), the Greens and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) promised to fully ban conversion therapy, include anti-discrimination protections in the constitution and give lesbian couples equal parenting rights, among other things.
They passed a trans self-determination law, and revoked a ban on gay and bi men donating blood, but they ran out of time to legislate on other promises, including compensation for what activists call “forced sterilizations.”
“I feel a mixture of rage and resignation,” said Cathrin Ramelow, a 61-year-old trans woman.
Ramelow has spent more than two decades campaigning for the state to compensate trans Germans who were made to choose between the right to legal documents that matched their gender identity or the chance to have children.
She was one of at least 10,000 people forced to become “permanently sterile” in order to change legal gender — a measure that was struck down in 2011, according to the Bundesverband Trans* advocacy group.
Others were forced to divorce their partners until that requirement was also struck down in 2009.
Germany’s outgoing government promised to compensate both groups, but were not able to table a bill pre-election.
Now these promises would likely be buried, activists say.
Even if the CDU/CSU does form a coalition with the SPD or the Greens, the conservatives oppose extending those LGBTQ+ rights measures that have already been promised, according to a questionnaire of Germany’s main parties.
Irrespective of the election results, or what threat politicians might pose, Ludwig and Ramelow said the scale of recent protests against the CDU-AfD cooperation gave hope that many ordinary Germans still had their backs.
“Thousands of people have shown in the streets that they’re against this,” Ramelow said, recalling recent rallies near her home in the coastal town of Wilhelmshaven.
“We are here — and every time there’s more of us,” Ludwig said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS