Concert ticket scalping is increasingly severe. From Hong Kong actor and singer Andy Lau (劉德華) to Japanese-American pop star Hikaru Utada, tickets for superstars’ concerts become hot commodities the moment they go on sale. However, prices are often artificially inflated by scalpers, harming fans and the market.
To address the issue, the Ministry of Culture has joined hands with local governments to implement real-name registration for popular concerts in large venues with a capacity of more than 10,000 people, to prevent scalping and protect the interests of consumers. The policy is not only a direct response to the market chaos, but also demonstrates the power of central and local government cooperation. However, the motivation and results of those measures are worth our consideration.
Ministry statistics show that ticket scalping is particularly prevalent for concerts that fail to implement real-name registration. In 2023, concerts held in large venues such as the Taipei Arena and Kaohsiung National Stadium became focal points, with the number of scalping reports increasing sharply. It is clear from the data that registration systems are vital weapons for combatting scalpers. The ministry’s report indicated that at concerts of major artists, such as Lau and Utada, the significant reduction in scalped tickets was attributed to the system. That has allowed more concert organizers to recognize its effectiveness.
However — despite the measure’s proven effectiveness — there still exist many obstacles to nationwide implementation. Although the ministry and local governments’ cooperation has demonstrated a certain degree of success in encouraging more concert organizers to adopt the system, some localities face different challenges. In particular, the six special municipalities face different market demands and on-site management conditions, so more detailed planning and cooperation is required to determine the best way to implement real-name registration. The Taipei City Government is considering measures such as offering discounted venue rental rates for the Taipei Arena as an incentive for organizers to adopt the system, while the Kaohsiung City Government said it intends to strengthen its coordination and promotion efforts. Those strategies illustrate local governments’ proactiveness in promoting the policy.
For the ministry, implementation would not be done overnight. Although its ultimate goal is to combat ticket scalping and protect consumer interests, the process involves more than just ticket management. Ticket sales are a commercial activity, and ensuring that scalpers cannot take advantage of the system without disrupting normal market operations would require joint efforts from the government and event organizers. From a global perspective, most countries lack strict regulations surrounding real-name registration — they tend to rely on government guidance and self-regulatory mechanisms. Thus, Taiwan is a pioneer, and its approach — if successful — could serve as an example.
However, real-name registration is not without its flaws, and certain details would need to be adjusted. Challenges — such as ensuring user privacy, preventing personal data leaks or handling ticket transfers in extraneous circumstances — might arise. The ministry and local governments should continuously revise and perfect the policies throughout their execution to protect consumer rights and interests, and guarantee a healthy market.
Although real-name registration is only one part of the effort to combat scalping, it has undoubtedly provided a boost to the concert market. As more venues and organizers adopt the system, it sets a new standard for preventing scalping, thereby providing fans with a fairer and more just market environment.
Chen Jie-an is a legal specialist for a technology corporation.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
RSS