Concert ticket scalping is increasingly severe. From Hong Kong actor and singer Andy Lau (劉德華) to Japanese-American pop star Hikaru Utada, tickets for superstars’ concerts become hot commodities the moment they go on sale. However, prices are often artificially inflated by scalpers, harming fans and the market.
To address the issue, the Ministry of Culture has joined hands with local governments to implement real-name registration for popular concerts in large venues with a capacity of more than 10,000 people, to prevent scalping and protect the interests of consumers. The policy is not only a direct response to the market chaos, but also demonstrates the power of central and local government cooperation. However, the motivation and results of those measures are worth our consideration.
Ministry statistics show that ticket scalping is particularly prevalent for concerts that fail to implement real-name registration. In 2023, concerts held in large venues such as the Taipei Arena and Kaohsiung National Stadium became focal points, with the number of scalping reports increasing sharply. It is clear from the data that registration systems are vital weapons for combatting scalpers. The ministry’s report indicated that at concerts of major artists, such as Lau and Utada, the significant reduction in scalped tickets was attributed to the system. That has allowed more concert organizers to recognize its effectiveness.
However — despite the measure’s proven effectiveness — there still exist many obstacles to nationwide implementation. Although the ministry and local governments’ cooperation has demonstrated a certain degree of success in encouraging more concert organizers to adopt the system, some localities face different challenges. In particular, the six special municipalities face different market demands and on-site management conditions, so more detailed planning and cooperation is required to determine the best way to implement real-name registration. The Taipei City Government is considering measures such as offering discounted venue rental rates for the Taipei Arena as an incentive for organizers to adopt the system, while the Kaohsiung City Government said it intends to strengthen its coordination and promotion efforts. Those strategies illustrate local governments’ proactiveness in promoting the policy.
For the ministry, implementation would not be done overnight. Although its ultimate goal is to combat ticket scalping and protect consumer interests, the process involves more than just ticket management. Ticket sales are a commercial activity, and ensuring that scalpers cannot take advantage of the system without disrupting normal market operations would require joint efforts from the government and event organizers. From a global perspective, most countries lack strict regulations surrounding real-name registration — they tend to rely on government guidance and self-regulatory mechanisms. Thus, Taiwan is a pioneer, and its approach — if successful — could serve as an example.
However, real-name registration is not without its flaws, and certain details would need to be adjusted. Challenges — such as ensuring user privacy, preventing personal data leaks or handling ticket transfers in extraneous circumstances — might arise. The ministry and local governments should continuously revise and perfect the policies throughout their execution to protect consumer rights and interests, and guarantee a healthy market.
Although real-name registration is only one part of the effort to combat scalping, it has undoubtedly provided a boost to the concert market. As more venues and organizers adopt the system, it sets a new standard for preventing scalping, thereby providing fans with a fairer and more just market environment.
Chen Jie-an is a legal specialist for a technology corporation.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS