Concert ticket scalping is increasingly severe. From Hong Kong actor and singer Andy Lau (劉德華) to Japanese-American pop star Hikaru Utada, tickets for superstars’ concerts become hot commodities the moment they go on sale. However, prices are often artificially inflated by scalpers, harming fans and the market.
To address the issue, the Ministry of Culture has joined hands with local governments to implement real-name registration for popular concerts in large venues with a capacity of more than 10,000 people, to prevent scalping and protect the interests of consumers. The policy is not only a direct response to the market chaos, but also demonstrates the power of central and local government cooperation. However, the motivation and results of those measures are worth our consideration.
Ministry statistics show that ticket scalping is particularly prevalent for concerts that fail to implement real-name registration. In 2023, concerts held in large venues such as the Taipei Arena and Kaohsiung National Stadium became focal points, with the number of scalping reports increasing sharply. It is clear from the data that registration systems are vital weapons for combatting scalpers. The ministry’s report indicated that at concerts of major artists, such as Lau and Utada, the significant reduction in scalped tickets was attributed to the system. That has allowed more concert organizers to recognize its effectiveness.
However — despite the measure’s proven effectiveness — there still exist many obstacles to nationwide implementation. Although the ministry and local governments’ cooperation has demonstrated a certain degree of success in encouraging more concert organizers to adopt the system, some localities face different challenges. In particular, the six special municipalities face different market demands and on-site management conditions, so more detailed planning and cooperation is required to determine the best way to implement real-name registration. The Taipei City Government is considering measures such as offering discounted venue rental rates for the Taipei Arena as an incentive for organizers to adopt the system, while the Kaohsiung City Government said it intends to strengthen its coordination and promotion efforts. Those strategies illustrate local governments’ proactiveness in promoting the policy.
For the ministry, implementation would not be done overnight. Although its ultimate goal is to combat ticket scalping and protect consumer interests, the process involves more than just ticket management. Ticket sales are a commercial activity, and ensuring that scalpers cannot take advantage of the system without disrupting normal market operations would require joint efforts from the government and event organizers. From a global perspective, most countries lack strict regulations surrounding real-name registration — they tend to rely on government guidance and self-regulatory mechanisms. Thus, Taiwan is a pioneer, and its approach — if successful — could serve as an example.
However, real-name registration is not without its flaws, and certain details would need to be adjusted. Challenges — such as ensuring user privacy, preventing personal data leaks or handling ticket transfers in extraneous circumstances — might arise. The ministry and local governments should continuously revise and perfect the policies throughout their execution to protect consumer rights and interests, and guarantee a healthy market.
Although real-name registration is only one part of the effort to combat scalping, it has undoubtedly provided a boost to the concert market. As more venues and organizers adopt the system, it sets a new standard for preventing scalping, thereby providing fans with a fairer and more just market environment.
Chen Jie-an is a legal specialist for a technology corporation.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS