A 15-year-old boy surnamed Tseng (曾) from Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) illegally drove his grandfather’s sports utility vehicle on the evening of Oct. 17 and crashed into a roadside eatery, killing three and injuring two. Such a serious incident, along with the fact that the sentence for young people under the age of 18 can be reduced by half according to the Criminal Code, triggered a public outcry.
This case is about a negligent act that caused multiple deaths and injuries. According to Article 55 of the Criminal Code, which regulates sentences for concurrent offenses, an act subject to more than one criminal sanction shall be penalized by only the most severe among the individual sentences.
According to Article 276 of the Criminal Code, the maximum penalty for a negligent death is five years in prison. Although there were multiple instances, Article 55 means that the maximum sentence is only five years, which would then be reduced to two-and-a-half years in the case of a minor. The punishment is obviously disproportionate to the crime.
A similar case involved Lee Yi-hsiang (李義祥), the main suspect in the Taroko Express crash that killed 49 and injured 213 in 2021. He was sentenced to only five years in prison, the maximum penalty for negligent homicide, which also raised public concerns about the punishment not fitting the crime.
The Executive Yuan has proposed amendments to Article 183 of the Criminal Code, which relates to the crime of overturning and destroying a vehicle, and Article 276, which regulates the crime of negligent homicide, adding provisions to increase the punishment for those who cause the death of three or more people due to gross negligence.
Despite the good intention, the bill failed to pass in the Legislative Yuan due to objections from a majority of legal experts.
Another attempt to revive the amendment was made last year after a blaze at a golf ball factory owned by manufacturer Launch Technologies Co in Pingtung County killed nine people and injured more than 100. However, it also failed to pass.
The Criminal Code is meant to protect our social norms and is the last line of defense for fairness and justice. It must keep up with the times.
The century-old predecessor of the current Criminal Code is the Qing Dynasty’s New Criminal Code, which was enacted in 1911 when vehicles were not as large and fast as they are now, and the types of crimes also differed greatly from the modern era due to changing social lifestyles.
Taiwan is a small and densely populated island with plenty of people lacking awareness of proper behavior. A negligent act could easily cause multiple deaths and injuries.
The ruling and opposition parties should put aside the useless disputes in the Legislative Yuan over whether to abolish the death penalty. Instead, they should communicate and coordinate on amending the Criminal Code to address serious negligent crimes as soon as possible.
When it comes to juvenile criminal trials, Taiwan’s Criminal Code has long been based on German law. German legislators believe that because the juvenile court is a professional court division, it should not be solely down to the judge to decide what kind of punishment meets the educational needs.
Instead, experts in education, psychology, sociology, psychiatry and other professions should be involved in the decision process. It is therefore necessary to establish a comprehensive system of expert participation before the juvenile criminal law can become an “education law.”
Establishing a system for juvenile criminal trial participation should not be difficult, given Taiwan’s society and legal system, including the experience of the citizen judge system that was launched two years ago.
The juvenile criminal court would be the first to establish expert participation in trials. Other professional court divisions, such as military courts, family courts and commercial courts, could then follow suit.
This would make Taiwan’s legal system more complete and in line with the trends in other advanced countries.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS