Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Saturday departed for Europe on her first overseas trip since concluding her second term in May. In Prague she delivered a speech at the Forum 2000 Conference. Czech President Petr Pavel greeted Tsai on her arrival at the conference, showcasing the level of trust between them.
Speaking at the annual conference, titled “Proving Democracy’s Resolve and Resilience,” Tsai underlined two main concepts informing her presidency — deepening ties with like-minded countries and safeguarding democracy as the cornerstone of the Taiwanese identity-building process.
She underscored the unbreakable bond between the democratic system and the very nature of Taiwan as a country.
“The people of Taiwan have demonstrated time and again that democracy is a non-negotiable part of who we are. It is part of our unwavering identity ... it is the commitment we made as Taiwanese,” Tsai said.
On further strengthening bilateral ties with like-minded countries, Tsai walked the talk with her visit to Brussels. She also intended to travel to the UK, where she was to be hosted by the British-Taiwanese All-Party Parliamentary Group. That visit was postponed after the British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office asked that it be deferred as it could anger Beijing ahead of British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Lammy’s trip to China.
As the new Labour government is cooperating with Beijing on topics such as climate change, trade, economy and education, hosting one of the most influential Taiwanese politicians was not seen as taking precedence over the need to exploit the various areas of collaboration with China.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Cabinet aspires to be a progressive government, and should act in accordance to its values by taking the necessary steps toward a closer, albeit predominantly informal, relationship with Taiwan. A good starting point would be listening to Tsai’s arguments concerning the nation’s identity-building process.
Her role as Taiwan’s brand ambassador could bring it closer to like-minded countries by working on the main points they have in common, especially those that have experienced decades of authoritarianism. It is no coincidence that Lithuania, the first republic to break away from the Soviet Union in 1990, is one of Taiwan’s major allies in Europe.
Tsai’s credibility is built on a lifelong reputation of being a principled freedom and democracy lover, who worked her entire life to make Taiwan a free, prosperous and advanced country. Her political career is rooted in a willingness to mark a significant shift when it comes to Taiwan’s relationship with China.
Tsai in 1999 was appointed one of the chief drafters of the special state-to-state relations doctrine under then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). It is the basis on which the country developed a new strategy toward China by assuming that the “one China, one Taiwan” concept was an ironclad fact. Under this strategy, the formal reality came to coincide with the substantial one, underscoring Taipei’s commitment to a friendly relationship with Beijing depending on mutual recognition.
Tsai, in accordance with her longstanding perspective regarding the matter, has devoted her political career to bringing awareness of Taiwan as a sovereign and independent country that is willing to contribute to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
Even if Beijing is unwilling to acknowledge reality, Taipei is committed to pursuing its political agenda whatever the challenges it faces. Tsai could be the ideal person to spread and promote Taiwan’s vision to the world.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which