On Tuesday, in Taipei’s Ximending shopping area, a group of Taiwanese and Hong Kongers were standing on a street corner holding a protest against China’s National Day celebration. They had banners and flags with the slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times.”
Two Chinese tourists provoked a fight with the protesters, yelling: “Taiwan and Hong Kong belong to China,” tearing their flags and vandalizing the signage.
Democratic Progressive Party Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said the two Chinese tourists provoked a fight, disparaging Taiwan’s democracy and rule of law. Lin urged Taipei police to act swiftly and investigate the matter.
Lin’s request is reasonable and has legal merit. Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation with its own judicial, executive and legislative branches.
No one, including tourists, is allowed to disrupt public order or start fights.
These Chinese tourists lack an understanding of the principles of freedom of speech and expression, best stated by English writer Evelyn Beatrice Hall in her famous summary of Voltaire’s democratic philosophy: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Chinese tourists have absolutely no right to limit the freedom of expression of Taiwanese or Hong Kongers, especially within Taiwan’s borders. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. What right do they have to go around picking fights and trying to halt the freedom of expression and speech of people who reside here?
Taiwan is a nation governed by the rule of law. These tourists were caught red-handed contravening the Criminal Code by obstructing and infringing on others’ liberties in their attempts to tear down and destroy others’ property.
As Lin said, troublemaker tourists such as this Chinese couple cannot be allowed to make a mockery of the rights enjoyed by the citizens of this country.
It is important that we show resolve in defending our democracy and rule of law.
Hu Wen-chi is the spokesperson of the People First Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS