Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) officially began its two-week presidential race on Thursday last week. The nine candidates took part in a debate two days after the announcement and the winner of the election would be announced on Friday.
In the fierce debate, Shinjiro Koizumi, the second son of former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi, and Shigeru Ishiba, former LDP secretary-general, both leading in the polls, were attacked from all sides.
Ishiba, who is making his fifth bid to lead the party, was calm and composed.
Shinjiro Koizumi, making his first bid to lead the party, frequently provided irrelevant answers dubbed “nonsense talk” by Japanese media who said he was incapable of delivering a convincing narrative.
Polling published by the Japanese-language Yomiuri Shimbun on Tuesday last week, which surveyed the party’s rank-and-file members and party supporters showed that Ishiba had the support of 26 percent of respondents, closely followed by Japanese Minister of State for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi at 25 percent, and Shinjiro Koizumi third with 16 percent.
Other candidates only garnered support in the single-digit percentage points.
Out of 352 LDP Diet members who responded in the same poll, Shinjiro Koizumi was backed by 45 of them, followed by Takaich at 29 and Ishiba at 26.
In the projected tally for all voters, including party members, supporters and Diet members, Takaichi and Ishiba were tied with 123 votes, closely followed by Koizumi with 105 votes.
This showed that Koizumi is not as popular among the party’s rank-and-file members and party supporters as Takaichi.
This suggests a trend.
Koizumi does not outshine in a three-horse race.
If there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, leading to a top-two runoff, the following matches are expected.
First: Koizumi versus Ishiba.
According to Yomiuri Shimbun’s poll, Koizumi is the most popular among LDP Diet members, with Ishiba far behind. Ishiba would likely lose in a runoff against Koizumi.
Second: Ishiba versus Takaichi.
If Takaichi rises above the others, the conservatives would support her. In this runoff, Ishiba would barely stand a chance against the attack of the diehard conservative followers of former deputy prime minister Taro Aso’s faction and late prime minister Shinzo Abe’s faction.
Takaichi would likely become the first female prime minister of Japan in such a scenario.
Third: Koizumi versus Takaichi.
If Ishiba loses in the first round, Aso’s faction would likely support Takaichi and former prime minister Yoshihide Suga’s faction would likely support Koizumi in the runoff — resulting in a contest between the two kingmakers.
If Takaichi garners support from Abe’s faction, she would have a competitive edge.
No matter who wins this election, the Japanese government would continue being a staunch US ally supporter of Taiwan.
This would not easily change given the general public is anti-China and pro-Taiwan.
The LDP presidential election is diverse and competitive: old versus young; male versus female; conservative versus reformist — and internecine strife. It is riveting.
Voters get to choose from many capable candidates. Opinions might differ, but they are reasonable differences.
The race would no doubt end peacefully, as a river runs into the sea. After all, it is a Japanese-style election.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Fion Khan
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS