New French Prime Minister Michel Barnier has yet to appoint a government, still less lay out its agenda. However, three-quarters of voters already believe that he would soon be on his way out, despite French President Emmanuel Macron’s hope that the former EU Brexit negotiator can safeguard his legacy after multiple misjudgments.
Barnier himself once described the president’s leadership as “solitary and arrogant.” That helps to explain the disastrous snap election. It saw support surge for National Rally leader Marine Le Pen’s far right in the first round, before the withdrawal of candidates by a republican front and tactical voting rode to the rescue in the second. The outcome was a legislature essentially split into three blocs — left, center and far right — in a country without a recent history of coalition building.
Macron worsened matters by rejecting the left-wing New Popular Front prime ministerial candidate Lucie Castets, which startled everyone by coming first in July. The left’s bickering and unwillingness to compromise has not helped itself. It was also true that such a government had a minimal chance of survival. However, the president should have allowed matters to take their course. Instead, he picked a prime minister whose fourth-placed The Republicans party holds only 47 of 577 seats and which did not sacrifice candidates to see off Le Pen’s National Rally, as the left and center did.
Barnier may be a dealmaker, but the truth is that he has been chosen as much for who he is not as who he is. Macron has been casting around for a right-leaning candidate who not only has a fighting chance of avoiding outright rejection by 289 MPs, but who is also willing to protect his legacy, especially his unpopular rise in the pension age. While for most of his career Barnier has been regarded as on the center-right, he voted against the decriminalization of homosexuality in 1981 and took a grim, hardline swing during an unsuccessful bid to be the right’s presidential candidate in 2021. That included a proposed moratorium on all immigration — including family reunions — from outside the EU. Speaking after his appointment, he said that “there still is a feeling that our borders are sieves.”
Le Pen said that he shares her party’s views on immigration. Barnier enjoys his position thanks to the far right’s acquiescence; he is captive to its caprice. That is hardly cause for celebration. Nor is it a long-term solution, since Le Pen needs him to fail.
Barnier’s first, immense challenge would be to draw up a budget next month and push it through. His experience and political skills might help his government win some leeway from Brussels over its spending plans, reassuring the EU that France is slashing its debt. However, it would be harder to make the politics and economics add up at home.
If the public is proved right about Barnier’s political lifespan, Macron would soon need to find a replacement. However, each time he rolls the dice, the odds get worse. Appointing a representative of the “old world” of politics — which he once vowed to sweep away — hardly meets the public demand for change. Turnout surged in this summer’s election to the highest level since 1981, but the resulting political maneuvering is increasing disenchantment with the democratic process. July’s second-round result, which brought such relief, is now being squandered.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS