Japan’s and China’s top diplomats met on the sidelines of the ASEAN Regional Forum on July 26, hoping to increase exchanges that promote mutually beneficial relations. However, the Chinese ministry misquoted the Japanese official’s comments on the “one China” issue, further fueling tensions between two sides.
Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Yoko Kamikawa and her Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi (王毅), had their first one-on-one talk in eight months on the sidelines of a gathering of foreign ministers in Laos to discuss issues between the two sides, including Japanese nationals being detained in China, Beijing’s bans on Japanese food imports and Japan’s semiconductor curbs.
After the meeting, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a statement saying “the Japanese foreign minister said that Japan’s adherence to the One China policy has not changed.”
That was different from the Japanese foreign ministry’s statement, which said that the Japanese minister expressed serious concern about the intensification of China’s military activities in areas surrounding Japan, and reiterated the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.
Kamikawa said China’s statement did not cite her words at the meeting correctly and reiterated that Japan has not changed its stance on Taiwan, which has long been consistent with the “ Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People’s Republic of China” issued in 1972.
“The Government of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China. The Government of Japan fully ‘understands’ and ‘respects’ this stand of the Government of the People’s Republic of China,” the document states.
Only 51 countries — not 180 as Beijing says — fully comply with China’s “one China principle,” while 16 “acknowledge” China’s claims, nine “recognize” the claims and some “respect” it, a study by National University of Singapore assistant professor Chong Ja Ian (莊嘉穎) found.
Meanwhile, 27 do not recognize the PRC as the sole legal government of China nor do they mention Taiwan’s sovereignty in official documents, the study showed.
China has long attempted to distort international perceptions of Taiwan through its cognitive and legal warfare. Its moves have also escalated and gotten more daring and arrogant. However, those could cause more nations and politicians to underline ambiguity and doubt about Beijing’s claims over Taiwan.
At least eight lawmakers from other countries, including Bolivia, Colombia, Slovakia, North Macedonia and Bosnia, said that they had been pressured by Chinese diplomats not to attend the annual meeting of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) that was held in Taiwan on July 30.
China’s move was “unprecedented,” “massively overstepping” and “unacceptable,” IPAC said.
To oppose China’s acts of intimidation, about 50 parliamentarians from 23 countries and the European Parliament participating at this year’s summit officially invited Taiwan to be a member of the alliance and collectively voted to pass a “ Model Resolution on 2758” against China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758, which merely said the PRC was the representative of China to the UN, but did not mention Taiwan, address its political status nor establish PRC sovereignty over Taiwan.
The IPAC members — more than 250 cross-party members from 40 countries — said they would seek to pass the model resolution in their respective parliaments to redress China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution and inappropriate linkage to its “one China principle.”
The diplomatic incidents caused by China have obviously dealt more blows to its campaign against Taiwan and Beijing has gotten itself into more predicaments internationally.
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
Deflation in China is persisting, raising growing concerns domestically and internationally. Beijing’s stimulus policies introduced in September last year have largely been short-lived in financial markets and negligible in the real economy. Recent data showing disproportionately low bank loan growth relative to the expansion of the money supply suggest the limited effectiveness of the measures. Many have urged the government to take more decisive action, particularly through fiscal expansion, to avoid a deep deflationary spiral akin to Japan’s experience in the early 1990s. While Beijing’s policy choices remain uncertain, questions abound about the possible endgame for the Chinese economy if no decisive
RSS