When a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator asked Chief of the General Staff Admiral Mei Chia-shu (梅家樹) what would be done if members of the armed forces flinched, fled or flouted commands during wartime, Mei said that facing desperate situations on a battlefield is bound to lead to such scenarios, so they are simulated in military drills, allowing the armed forces to practice how to respond.
To get the armed forces prepared for battle, psychological and legal issues must be addressed.
The Ministry of National Defense has been giving soldiers simulated training to strengthen their resilience to stress. With intensive training, they are expected to exude confidence and enhance their survival skills.
As the saying goes, “what kills you during the battle is not only the enemy, but also yourself.”
Through simulations, members of the armed forces of all ranks can be trained and psychologically prepared to respond to any battlefield situation.
In terms of the law, court martials have been suspended for 10 years since the death of former army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘).
Moreover, it has been 12 years since the Examination for Military Judges was last held.
The ministry has since 2012 held the Examination of Defense Legal Officers and the 39th Han Kuang military exercises were conducted in July last year.
Furthermore, reservists participated in simulated provisional court cases to give them practical experience.
However, Lieutenant General Shen Shih-wei (沈世偉), director of the ministry’s Judicial Department, said in a symposium on military tribunals at National Taiwan University in March that he doubted a military aircraft pilot who has only had experience on simulators could accomplish a wartime mission.
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that new military judges would need opportunities to accumulate experience, but the bottom line is that court martials are no longer part of the judicial system in Taiwan.
To resolve the problem, judges provided by the Judicial Yuan are likely to be trained for wartime roles. The ministry has not yet set the plan in motion and it is unrealistic to ask judges to be trained for a military role, as an avalanche of fraud cases have crippled the judicial system.
The establishment and application of a country’s military strength hinges on the government’s national security strategy and war preparedness. The power of the military is determined by balance in war preparedness, capable soldiers and a sound court martial system.
Only when there is a military court system in place that operates properly during peacetime can military strength be maintained during wartime. If members of the armed forces desert, disobey orders or do anything that infringes on military discipline, the survival of the nation is jeopardized. This cannot be tolerated or the military’s morale and cohesion would be undermined and it would not be able to stand and fight.
If that is the case, what is the point of having a military at all?
At this critical time, with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army imposing military pressure in the Taiwan Strait, military personnel who are well-versed in the culture and military affairs surely know how to make proper arrangements regarding investigating, detaining and sentencing military offenders.
Maintenance of military discipline must be emphasized to cater to the needs of individual regiments.
The restoration of the court martial system must be considered, especially the restoration of military prosecutors.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS