Minutes after Russia-friendly Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico was shot, social media was awash with conspiracy theories. The attacker’s wife was a refugee from Ukraine, he was linked to a high-profile government critic and Fico’s security guard was plotting against the prime minister, some theories said.
All those rumors were later rebutted by Slovak authorities, but not before they had gone viral on Telegram.
The messaging app has become a key weapon for pro-Kremlin accounts to spread disinformation aimed at undermining support for Ukraine. Russian intelligence officers have used it to recruit petty criminals to carry out acts of sabotage across European capitals.
These incidents trade off Telegram’s key advantage: It is largely unaccountable.
That is what most antagonizes European officials who have made the fight against fake news a top priority ahead of continent-wide elections next month. For all their new powers to regulate information online, they are largely powerless to rein in Telegram.
“Disinformation is spreading openly and completely unchecked on Telegram,” Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas said.
Requests to remove disturbing content frequently go unanswered, she said.
“We know that other member states have similar problems,” she said.
A typical pro-Russian propaganda campaign relies on a barrage of online techniques. These include social media posts, stories on state media outlets, fabricated news stories designed to mimic the look of legitimate Web sites, and anonymous comments on real ones.
Telegram functions as a central node in that ecosystem, a kind of bridge that propaganda groups use to blast their content into active social communities, with the goal of amplifying their narratives to a wider audience.
“Telegram is popular among various pro-Russian actors as well as individuals who have been spreading disinformation for a long time because there is almost no content moderation,” said Daniel Milo, former director of the Slovak Ministry of the Interior’s Center for Countering Hybrid Threats.
“The rules of Telegram in this regard are very, very lax,” Milo added.
The EU has sharpened its powers to deal with illegal and harmful content, in an attempt to thwart malicious actors from spreading misinformation ahead of European elections.
However, when it comes to Telegram, these measures are not very effective — the tools with real bite apply only to platforms with more than 45 million active users in Europe. Telegram has 41 million, its owners say.
These numbers do not tell the whole story and “the European Commission should conduct an independent evaluation,” Kallas said.
The commission did not respond to a request for comment.
All the same, Telegram’s numbers put it below the threshold required to trigger a set of stringent obligations under the EU’s flagship Digital Services Act (DSA), which came into full effect in February.
For large platforms, the EU can levy fines of as much as 6 percent of annual sales if it finds violations — or ban repeat offenders from the EU.
Those rules cover Meta Platforms Inc’s Facebook, Alphabet Inc’s YouTube and ByteDance Ltd’s TikTok, among others.
Smaller platforms fall under the national agencies where the firms have legal representation. That is Belgium, in Telegram’s case. However, national authorities have limited powers to take action over content on the service, a Belgian Institute for Post and Telecommunications spokesman said in an e-mail.
“Calls for violence or damage of property are explicitly forbidden on Telegram,” a spokesperson for the company said in response to questions.
They added that moderators monitor public parts of the platform to remove content that breaches its terms of service.
Were Telegram to be designated a “very large online platform” under the DSA, it would be obliged to take measures against the spread of disinformation and put in place tougher content moderation protocols, Kallas said.
“It would also ensure a level playing field within the internal market, as other platforms have taken significant efforts to comply with the Digital Services Act,” she added.
The main themes of Russia’s disinformation efforts include its war against Ukraine, the conflict in the Middle East, immigration, climate change and the upcoming European parliament elections, an internal EU assessment seen by Bloomberg said.
On those five topics, the number of items from unverified sources across all platforms had more than doubled by the beginning of this month, compared with fewer than 20,000 pieces a day at the start of the year, the assessment showed.
The Kremlin has repeatedly denied involvement in disinformation and sabotage operations.
The Kremlin has not always been so amenable to Telegram. A Russian court in 2018 ordered the app to be blocked for refusing to turn over its encryption keys to the security services, although efforts to prevent its use failed. In 2020, Russia’s communications watchdog dropped its efforts to block it. Telegram has also been used by protesters, including in Hong Kong and Iran, to organize and evade surveillance.
Its founder, owner and CEO, Pavel Durov, left Russia in 2014 after losing control of his previous company for refusing to hand over the data of Ukrainian protesters to security agencies.
Based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, the company passed 700 million monthly active users last year.
Nevertheless, when the French foreign-disinformation watchdog Viginum announced in February that it had detected preparations for a massive disinformation campaign involving a network of about 200 Web sites across several European countries it found that content from Telegram was central to that campaign.
After the attempted assassination in Slovakia, a Telegram channel with about 50,000 subscribers shared a long post from a Web site that falsely claimed to be the Daily Telegraph, a prominent British publication.
The text asserted without evidence that pro-Ukrainian forces were responsible for the shooting of Fico. That came during a time when authorities in Slovakia were asserting the motive for the incident remained under investigation.
The suspect, identified as 71-year-old Juraj C., later told investigators that he had acted alone and that he was motivated by his opposition to a range of Fico’s policies, including the decision to halt military support for Ukraine, a court document showed.
Fico, who remains hospitalized, was shot four times at close range.
Masquerading as local news outlets has been the work of a disinformation outfit that researchers have named “Doppelganger,” which is notorious for using Telegram to push fake content which purports to be from mainstream media.
The same operation, which is the focus of an EU investigation into Meta, has used more than 2,000 inauthentic social media accounts, cybersecurity firm Recorded Future Inc said.
Those personae have sought to undermine faith in Ukraine’s military effort by posing as news organizations, or targeting German audiences to weaken confidence in their lawmakers.
The group has also spread videos that falsely claim to be from al-Jazeera and EuroNews.
To infiltrate social media discourse, Doppelganger uses tactics that are more advanced than simply blasting false information through social media channels.
The group uses cheap domain name services that are often hosted on Russian services, a tactic that makes it difficult for Western agencies to take the sites offline, security firm Sekoia said.
From there Doppelganger spreads the links containing false information to Telegram, where the goal is to create user engagement in multiple channels and ultimately go viral elsewhere on social media, with smaller countries especially vulnerable.
“Nearly a third of the content on Slovak Telegram accounts originates from or is directly taken from various Russian sources,” Milo said.
“Telegram plays a key role in spreading Russian narratives,” Milo added.
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her