International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Karim Khan’s request for an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has created a diplomatic quandary for some key member states: How to be supportive of both Israel and the ICC?
Khan’s move on Monday, the first attempt to go after a sitting, Western-backed head of state, has yet to be reviewed by ICC judges who can amend, reject or approve it, but his step into the globally divisive Israeli-Palestinian conflict has some of the ICC’s vocal backers questioning the extent of their loyalty.
Prosecutors had flagged plans ahead of time to some capitals, including Paris, London and Berlin, enabling governments to coordinate reactions. Still, many declined to say what they would do in the event that warrants over the war in Gaza are issued against Israeli leaders.
“Of course it puts us into trouble for various reasons,” a German government official said on condition of anonymity, citing Berlin’s simultaneous unwavering political commitment to Israel’s security and support for an independent ICC prosecutor.
Germany has already defended its policy of supplying arms to Israel at another international court in The Hague, and an ICC warrant for Netanyahu would add more unwelcome political pressure, diplomatic sources said.
It could also undermine German efforts to bolster support for the ICC in Washington, one government source said.
US President Joe Biden called Khan’s targeting of Israeli officials “outrageous” and said there is no equivalence between Hamas and Israel, and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the Biden administration is willing to work with the US Congress to potentially impose sanctions on ICC officials.
The war in Gaza erupted after Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7 last year, killing 1,200 people and seizing more than 250 hostages, Israeli authorities say. More than 35,000 Palestinians have since been killed in an Israeli invasion and bombardments of Gaza, with at least 10,000 more missing and much of the enclave pounded into rubble, Gaza’s health ministry says.
Khan requested arrest warrants against Netanyahu, Israeli Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant as well as three Hamas leaders for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the conflict.
Divisions in Europe over Khan’s decision reflect a deeper international schism over the Palestinians’ longtime quest for statehood, brought to the forefront on Wednesday when several countries said they would recognize a Palestinian state.
All 27 EU countries are ICC members and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said that they “are bound to execute the court’s decisions.”
However, Khan’s move exposed political differences between European powers over the conflict and their efforts to support international justice.
The UK, an ICC member since 2001 which backed Khan’s bid to become prosecutor, had sought ways together with G7 counterparts to prevent the ICC from issuing “problematic” warrants for Israelis, one diplomatic source said.
“I don’t believe for one moment that seeking these warrants is going to help get the hostages out, it’s not going to help get aid in and it’s not going to help deliver a sustainable ceasefire,” British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Cameron told the UK parliament on Tuesday.
“And as we’ve said from the outset, because Israel is not a signatory to the [ICC’s founding] Rome statute and because Palestine is not recognized as a state, we don’t think that the court has jurisdiction in this area,” he added.
While Israel is not a member of the ICC and rejects its jurisdiction, the court admitted the Palestinian territories in 2015 and Khan says his office has jurisdiction over the events since Oct. 7 last year in Israel and the Gaza Strip.
Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs Antonio Tajani told local TV on Monday he opposed equating the crimes of Hamas — an Islamist movement sworn to Israel’s destruction — on Oct. 7 last year to the response of the military of a democratically elected government.
He told Corriere della Sera on Tuesday that an ICC warrant could “fuel anti-semitism.” An Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs official said any coordinated response by European states is unlikely because of differing views on the ICC and Israel.
Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheal Martin said “it is vital that we respect the independence and impartiality of the ICC,” while Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala said the prosecutor’s request was “appalling and completely unacceptable.”
In a statement, France said it had for months “been warning of the need for strict compliance with international humanitarian law, and in particular of the unacceptable level of civilian casualties” in Gaza.
The French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs added that it “supports the International Criminal Court, its independence and the fight against impunity in all situations.”
Spanish Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Diaz welcomed the “good news” of the ICC prosecutor’s request.
“International law must apply to everyone. We have been calling for months for support for their investigation,” Diaz said.
Spain’s cooperation with the ICC arrest warrants is anchored in domestic law and executing them is “automatic” through Interpol, a government source said on condition of anonymity.
Israel and Palestinian leaders have dismissed allegations of war crimes, and representatives of both sides criticized Khan’s decision.
European Council on Foreign Relations senior policy fellow Anthony Dworkin said the request for warrants in itself could limit any travel plans for Netanyahu and Gallant.
All 124 member states are required to arrest wanted fugitives from the ICC, he said.
“It would be especially damaging if European countries fail to observe arrest warrants, as they have always been among the court’s most active supporters,” he said.
“It is vital for the credibility of European claims to support the rule of law that European officials do nothing to undermine or condemn the ICC’s actions, or suggest that democratic countries should be above the law,” he added.
The ICC has no police force, so the arrest of suspects must be carried out by member or cooperative states. In 2015, South Africa let then-Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir walk away even though the ICC wanted him for alleged war crimes and genocide.
The Netherlands, an outspoken ally of Israel which hosts an array of international courts in The Hague, declined to answer specific questions about whether it would act upon a possible warrant in the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS