Nine years after their first meeting, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Wednesday last week met in Beijing, the highlight of Ma’s visit to China. Much like their first encounter in Singapore, Ma’s meeting with his “old friend” Xi was yet another disappointment.
To secure his historical legacy no matter the cost, the Ma administration in 2015 pushed for the first Ma-Xi meeting, despite public objections. Even that “shot in the arm” could not save the lost trust of Taiwanese in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and it showed how Ma — who once had a support rating of only 9.2 percent — has often been out of touch with mainstream opinion.
Even though a National Chengchi University Poll showed that the percentage of Taiwanese who identify as Chinese has fallen to a new low of 2.4 percent, Ma in his most recent visit said in front of Xi that “Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait ... belong to the same Chinese race ... and they are of Chinese descent.”
Ma also showed ignorance of the international reality. At the same time as his visit, the US expressed concern about the Chinese Communist Party’s “gray zone” tactics against Taiwan, such as in disputes near Kinmen County. The US, Japan and the Philippines met to discuss a response to Chinese expansion in the South China Sea, and the AUKUS security pact of Australia, the UK and the US said it was considering cooperation with Japan. Meanwhile, South Korean President Yoon Seok-yeol ordered a firm response to Chinese vessels engaged in illegal fishing.
While the world’s democratic nations recognize China’s intrusions and the threat it poses to its neighbors, and are working together on ways to counter it, Ma, despite his status as a former head of state, acted as though he lives in a parallel universe. He spoke as though Chinese expansionism and harassment do not exist. In his speech, he not only avoided calling China a “troublemaker,” but also shifted the blame for cross-strait tensions to the pro-Taiwanese independence camp.
Ma also appeared submissive to an authoritarian regime. His visit to China started at the former residence of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), a founder of the Republic of China (ROC), before traveling to Huanghuagang, also known as the Yellow Flower Mound Park, where the Second Guangzhou Uprising against the Qing Dynasty took place in 1911. The trip ended in Beijing, where he read his script nervously in front of the world’s biggest dictator.
The first two sites concern those who sought to overturn an autocratic monarchy to found the ROC, while the latter is the seat of power of a regime threatening to annex Taiwan under one-party rule. Xi even abolished term limits to remain president for life.
The irony is too great to be ignored. Submission to authoritarianism does not necessarily bring about positive changes.
Ma’s absurd remarks such as “trusting Xi” and “Taiwan’s not a country” were rewarded with the highly anticipated second Ma-Xi meeting. The public broadcast of their summit ended when Ma was still talking about the original interpretations of the so-called “1992 consensus,” as a large number of media were “cleared out” by the Chinese officials from the venue.
“You haven’t changed,” Xi said to Ma when they met. He is right: Ma has not changed. Nine years later, Ma remains detached from mainstream public opinion, ignorant of the international reality and submissive to authoritarianism.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS