With China’s economy in the doldrums, people have been asking whether a slowing economy might make Chinese less supportive of a hypothetical invasion of Taiwan. With more pressing issues, such as healthcare, housing and cost of living, Chinese might be more concerned with developments inside their country, rather than “reunifying the motherland,” using the parlance of the Chinese Communist Party.
“Ordinary Chinese people are not pushing the government to get unification,” one Chinese told al-Jazeera last week, adding: “It is the government that pushes people to believe that there must be unification.”
University of Manchester China Institute research fellow Wang Tao, writing for Foreign Policy last week, said that going by recent comments on Chinese social media, Chinese are souring on the idea of a Taiwan invasion. He said this is a marked change from online sentiment in the past few years, which has been characterized by bellicose nationalism and anti-Taiwan warmongering.
“Who is going to fight the war? If I die, who is going to pay my mortgage or my car loan?” wrote one user regarding a post from Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) about “reunification” with Taiwan.
However, these comments and interviews should be taken with a pinch of salt, as they might not be representative of wider public opinion. Polling on this matter suggests Chinese would be more than willing to support an invasion.
In an article titled “Assessing Public Support for (Non-)Peaceful Unification with Taiwan: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey in China” published in the Journal of Contemporary China, academics Adam Liu (劉遙) and Li Xiaojun (李曉雋) asked Chinese whether they would find “armed unification” acceptable. Fifty-five percent of respondents said they would, while 33 percent said they would not.
Public opinion data in authoritarian countries tend to be unreliable given that respondents are incentivized to self-censor for fear of the repercussions for speaking against the party line. Yet 55 percent, even for an authoritarian country, is high. On the eve of Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, 43 percent of Russians said the use of military force against Ukraine to force it to join Russia would be wrong, while 36 percent said it would be right.
A few comments online and in interviews with journalists expressing skepticism about supporting an invasion should not encourage Taiwanese. Many in the West hoped that Russians would not support their government’s invasion of Ukraine. Especially once the impact of sanctions hit, the hope was that a political movement would rise up and force the regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin to withdraw. The democratic world has been disappointed.
Like Russia’s, the Chinese political system is based on depoliticization and demobilization. People are encouraged to not get involved in politics, and for a variety of reasons, they duly oblige.
Fundamentally, authoritarian political rulers are not answerable to their public, and often make decisions themselves. While there might be some grumbling online and chuntering with journalists, if China were to invade Taiwan, do not expect the Chinese people to take a stand and stop the carnage.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS