Recently, Nauru terminated its diplomatic ties with Taiwan and switched to recognizing China, a development that has raised eyebrows given the historically strong ties between Taiwan and Nauru.
It no longer acknowledges Taiwan as a sovereign state, but rather considers it an integral part of China, the Nauruan government said in a formal statement.
The foreign policy stance adopted by Nauru poses a significant cause for concern within the realm of Taiwan’s international relations.
It is evident that over the years, there has been a gradual decline in the number of nations that recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state. Today, just 12 countries have formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, down from 22 in 2016.
Seven nations in Latin America and the Caribbean — Belize, Guatemala, Paraguay, Haiti, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines — maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan. In the South Pacific region, only three countries — the Marshall Islands, Palau and Tuvalu — uphold formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In Africa, only Eswatini formally recognizes Taiwan, while in Europe, the Vatican stands as the sole country that formally recognizes Taiwan.
The South Pacific holds significant importance as a focal point of concern due to China’s extensive implementation of persuasion strategies within this area. Notably, China is the third-largest financial contributor in the region, following Australia and the US, by offering substantial aid packages aimed at bolstering trade, infrastructure development, governmental and military capabilities and natural resource exploitation.
An intriguing aspect of China’s engagement in the South Pacific region lies in its provision of non-binding assistance with lenient conditions. This approach holds particular appeal for countries in the region, given their relatively low national incomes.
For nations that previously recognized Taiwan, the allure of China’s persuasive tactics through non-binding aid with flexible terms presented a formidable challenge to resist.
Following its initial allegiance to Taiwan, Nauru transitioned its recognition to China.
This development prompts the question: How should Taiwan respond?
Taiwan must escalate its diplomatic efforts by engaging in extensive dialogues with countries that remain supportive of Taiwan. This concerted dialogue could manifest in the organization of high-level ministerial conferences geared towards fostering mutually beneficial cooperation between the involved parties.
It is imperative for Taiwan to expeditiously take action to garner international backing, as the gradual shift of countries’ formal recognition away from Taiwan harms the nation’s interests and international visibility. This underscores the critical necessity for Taiwan’s political leadership to proactively address this pressing concern.
Sustaining the “status quo,” wherein Taiwan is acknowledged as an independent entity, entails significant resource allocation across military, economic and political spheres.
The most prudent course of action for Taiwan appears to be the cultivation of strong ties with the US, its strategic ally, to help the nation navigate the burgeoning impact of China’s influence on Taiwan’s sovereignty. Taiwan should also fortify its military capabilities to deter any unforeseen actions by China.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath