Taiwan is geographically close to China, but the two are becoming increasingly distant from each other.
In the Martial Law era, when Taiwan’s route to democratization was blocked, many lamented the closeness between Taiwan and China, wondering if it would be much better if Taiwan could get away as far away from China as possible, out into the Pacific Ocean.
When Taiwan wanted to treat China as its brother, it refused, believing instead that it should be considered Taiwan’s fatherland. As World War II came to an end, some Taiwanese considered China to be a fatherland. They mistakenly believed that China was the first democratic republic in Asia. They even expected that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would somehow become democratic. Some also hoped that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would liberate Taiwan. In short, the nation in the postwar era was in total confusion and disorientation. Such was the tragic beginning of Taiwan’s postwar history.
At the outset of the postwar era, Taiwan failed to become an independent country. Shortly after, the 228 Incident happened and the White Terror started. The KMT ruled with terror under martial law. Taiwan was forced to be caught up in the struggles between the KMT and the CCP.
The government of the Republic of China (ROC) used education and mass communication to transform those living in Taiwan into “Chinese.” After the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was recognized as the legitimate representative of China in the UN, the ROC was made into “Chinese Taipei” and “ROC Taiwan.”
The ROC is only a facade; Taiwan is the core.
The KMT adhered to “Chineseness,” refusing to let the country divest itself of the China connection. As a result, even though it is entirely different from China, Taiwanese have been left in limbo about their national identity. It is often foreigners who see that Taiwan is Taiwan, not China.
As Taiwan entered a new era, especially after political power transitioned to a party that was not the KMT, the sense of identifying as Taiwanese became more prevalent. Citizens finally realized the vicious and ruthless behavior embedded in the political attitudes and national patterns of the KMT and CCP. They realized the importance of self-development and self-reliance.
Since 1895, when Taiwan became a colony of Japan, Taiwan’s experience has been different from China’s. The end of WWII in 1945 made Taiwan “welcome” China, leading to a period of pain. It was caught up in the prolonged struggle between the KMT and the CCP. China appears inherently unable to commit itself to democracy and freedom, whereas becoming a democratic and free country is precisely what Taiwan wants after decades of tragedy.
The number of Taiwanese identifying as only Chinese hit a new low of 2.4 percent, survey results from National Chengchi University’s Election Study Center showed last year.
It should be emphasized that “Chinese” is a confusing term. Many still use “Chinese” as an identity, including ROC nationals, PRC nationals and those who emigrated abroad and became citizens of foreign countries. “Chinese” as a term only deepens the confusion regarding Taiwan’s national identity.
The survey results show that Taiwanese are on the right path to gaining a true national identity. This is only natural and normal for a democratized and free country.
Finally, Taiwanese have the ways and means to build a normal personality from the foundation of being a human being, a Taiwanese national and citizen of the world. Any political party that intervenes in the self-development of Taiwanese consciousness would eventually be eliminated.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Emma Liu
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press