Taiwan’s men defeated China and South Korea in the 3x3 basketball at the Asian Games in Hangzhou, China, to reach the final, where they beat Qatar with a turn-around victory, unexpectedly taking home the gold and surprising the basketball world.
I watched the entire tournament. In the final, Taiwan fell behind and drew level at the last minute. After Qatar were fouled in the final seconds, Taiwan made the free throw and won, demonstrating the team’s true grit.
The gold medal was unexpected because basketball is a mainstream, highly competitive sport. Taiwan’s previous performances at international basketball events have shown how difficult it is to perform at the top level.
The coaches said that the players, who are at least 190cm tall, are able to shoot from beyond the arc, are hard-working, and demonstrate acute defense awareness and adaptability.
As the underdogs in the final, the team held their own and turned the game around at the end.
Besides demonstrating Taiwan’s fearlessness and “never give up” attitude, the players making possible the impossible conveyed Taiwan’s values, and brought incomparable pride and confidence.
Apart from the men’s basketball team, judoka Yang Yung-wei (楊勇緯) and go player Hsu Hao-hung (許皓鋐) have beaten high-ranking opposition at their national sports.
If sports performances are indicative of Taiwan’s power and image, then the performances in Hangzhou have been a great success.
Tao Yi-che is an adjunct assistant professor of English as a medium of instruction at National Taipei University of Business and is in charge of implementing bilingual instruction at the Affiliated High School of National Chengchi University.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
RSS