Throughout human history, raw materials have played a key role in economic development, international relations, and the destinies of entire nations and civilizations. From precious metals (silver and gold) and agricultural commodities (sugar, rubber, silk and spices) to energy resources (oil and gas), changes in demand spurred by technological developments have rewritten global trade patterns, shifted fortunes, and often fueled conflict and exploitation.
In the 2020s, we are becoming increasingly reliant on a new set of critical raw materials, including rare-earth elements (REEs) and metals such as lithium, gallium and germanium. These commodities’ use in everything from solar panels, batteries and wind turbines to computer chips for industry and defense makes them vital to the green and digital transitions, which in turn would determine our future on this planet.
Europe would never be able to meet its own demand for REEs or lithium domestically, but neither should that be its goal. The goal, rather, is to secure access to critical raw materials so that it does not find itself at the mercy of those who might weaponize them — as the Kremlin has done with hydrocarbons. Such access is crucial for strengthening our strategic autonomy, maintaining our competitiveness and meeting our climate ambitions.
To achieve this goal, we must avoid the mistakes of the past, not least overreliance on a single supplier. Recent events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, have amplified the importance of secure supply chains across all economic sectors. They also highlight the substantial influence of the world’s largest emerging economies — including the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) — which dominate many important global supply chains, including those for critical raw materials.
As we continue to pursue decarbonization and electrification, metals and minerals would become ever more important. Global demand for REEs alone is forecast to increase fivefold by 2030. However, on the supply side, a single country currently dominates the market: Almost 90 percent of REEs and 60 percent of the world’s lithium are processed in China.
We already know from recent experience how serious the risks of such dependencies are. To avoid disruptions, Europe must diversify and derisk its supply chains. However, there is no silver bullet. The problem would not be solved simply by investing in European mining, nor would that make economic sense. Instead, we need to work with likeminded partners around the world to help scale up their extraction and processing capacities.
Still, we do have some difficult decisions to make with respect to mining projects within Europe, and we also must invest more in our own refineries and processing plants to lay the groundwork for achieving a net zero circular economy. These are massive undertakings that would require a significant and sustained investment.
Past initiatives like the 2017 Battery Alliance show that we can succeed when we come together. Europe is now home to one of the greenest and most advanced battery gigafactories in the world. Soon, Europe will produce two-thirds of the lithium-ion batteries it needs for electric vehicles and energy storage.
To repeat this success story, we must avoid looking at the critical raw-materials challenge in isolation. All initiatives related to ensuring secure supplies should be integrated within a comprehensive policy, as we have done in the fight against climate change. In adopting this approach, we must be clear-eyed about European foreign policy, which should aim to develop and deepen strategic partnerships, and to boost investments in Europe and in partner countries.
This year’s EU Critical Raw Materials Act has already set the necessary policy changes in motion. As European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in her state-of-the union address this month, many countries around the world are eager to work together on securing global supply chains.
It is clear that Europe must do more to safeguard access to critical supplies. The European Investment Bank (EIB) Group — which has already provided 3 billion euros (US$3.2 billion) for strengthening raw-materials supply chains over the past seven years — is fully on board. But we also recognize that Europe’s existing toolbox is insufficient. The EIB Group is already working on a critical raw-materials initiative to ensure that it will be able to live up to these objectives, and we are encouraging others to do the same — from the level of regulation down to specific, concrete projects.
Access to strategically important raw materials has been a determinant of economic wealth and development throughout history. To secure our future, we must seize the initiative and make safeguarding access to this century’s new vital commodities a top priority.
Werner Hoyer is president of the European Investment Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big