The world economy remains beset by challenges, from tight monetary, financial and fiscal conditions to the effects of the war in Ukraine. These headwinds are impeding global growth — which is expected to slow to 3 percent this year, compared to 3.5 percent in 2022 — damaging lives and livelihoods, with poverty and food insecurity on the rise, particularly in developing countries. In addressing the complex and overlapping challenges the world faces, Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is a region with much to offer.
For starters, LAC countries can help create a more resilient global food market. As early as 2017, the World Economic Forum facilitated a joint ministerial declaration calling for the region to become the “breadbasket of the world.” At last year’s Summit of the Americas, hosted by the US, participants released an Agriculture Producers Declaration underscoring the important role of major LAC exporters in strengthening global food security.
The reason is obvious. With one-quarter of the world’s arable land and one-third of its freshwater resources, the LAC already comprises the largest net food exporter among world regions. What is needed now is new investment, especially in physical and digital infrastructure and in climate-resilient agriculture, continued technological and competitiveness improvements and better integration into regional and global value chains.
Illustration: Yusha
Beyond food, the region is well-positioned to become a global climate leader. LAC countries account for less than 10 percent of global greenhouse-gas emissions, and are home to trailblazers in the quest for a green and just transition. For example, Costa Rica and Uruguay were among the first countries in the world to start generating nearly all domestic electricity from renewable sources. Even carbon-intensive economies, such as Colombia, are now undertaking ambitious reforms to mitigate climate change.
More important, with two-thirds of the world’s lithium reserves and 40 percent of its copper reserves — both essential to climate-friendly technologies — the region holds the key to curbing emissions everywhere and will play a major role in ensuring that these critical minerals are sourced and processed in environmentally and socially sustainable ways. This explains why these resources featured prominently in the recently announced 45 billion euro (US$49 billion) EU-LAC Global Gateway Investment Agenda.
LAC countries also have an important role to play when it comes to climate adaptation. With climate change already affecting vulnerable communities in the region, these countries are offering valuable insights into the dangers that lie ahead and into the virtues and limits of current adaptation strategies — and becoming increasingly influential in global discussions. Already, Barbados played a prominent role in the Paris Summit for a New Global Financing Pact in June this year. Brazil is to assume the G20 presidency at the end of this year and host the UN climate summit (COP30) in 2025.
More broadly, LAC countries are experimenting with, and mainstreaming, innovative instruments that link policy, climate, nature and finance. The Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility provides a financial buffer against increasingly frequent extreme weather.
Furthermore, in May, Ecuador completed the world’s largest-ever debt-for-nature swap, generating US$323 million in savings to finance conservation projects. This followed Belize’s landmark 2021 debt-for-nature swap, widely hailed as a successful model for subsequent conversions.
Last year, Chile and Uruguay issued the world’s sovereign sustainability-linked bonds. Moreover, Colombia became the first country in the western hemisphere to adopt a national green taxonomy, a classification tool that enables lenders and borrowers to identify economic activities that contribute to environmental goals. This year, Mexico unveiled its own sustainable taxonomy, covering both environmental and social objectives.
LAC countries are also bringing their experience to bear on other vital global policy discussions. Consider inflation, a frequent challenge in the region. Over the past two years, many LAC central banks hiked interest rates more quickly and aggressively than their advanced-economy counterparts. The policy appears to have paid off: The region, excluding Venezuela and Argentina, kept inflation below the OECD average last year (though complacency must be avoided).
At the same time, the region is devising potentially transferable approaches to international migration and displacement, which remain high worldwide as a result of humanitarian, economic, climate or other factors. For example, the socioeconomic integration of Venezuelan migrants in host communities in Colombia and elsewhere makes for a useful case study.
There is no shortage of areas where LAC countries can leverage their strengths to assert global leadership. Yet if the region is to seize the opportunities ahead, it must prepare itself better by accelerating development progress at home.
Many LAC countries need to do more to advance and balance their growth, fiscal and equity goals. Rigorous policymaking is urgently needed amid continued inflationary pressures and risk-off sentiment. On the micro front, productivity and labor-market improvements are essential to repair the damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and make the most of the region’s most valuable asset: human capital.
Sound public policy, strong institutional capacity and more effective and efficient government programs will be vital to address these macro and micro challenges and ensure socioeconomic progress. Greater regional integration would also help by supporting the protection and development of regional and global public goods. Collaboration with the private sector, civil society, multilateral organizations and the international community would also be indispensable.
Can the region meet its potential for global leadership? We certainly hope so. A more resilient, sustainable and inclusive LAC can help build a world that is greener, more energy-secure and better fed, while contributing solutions to the most pressing global policy and governance challenges. At this critical moment, what is good for Latin America and the Caribbean is good for the world.
Pepe Zhang is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center. Otaviano Canuto is a former vice president and executive director of the World Bank, executive director of the IMF, vice president of the Inter-American Development Bank and vice minister of finance of Brazil. He is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a senior fellow at the Policy Center for the New South.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Forward Forum in Taipei, former Singaporean minister for foreign affairs George Yeo (楊榮文) proposed a “Chinese commonwealth” as a potential framework for political integration between Taiwan and China. Yeo said the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait is unsustainable and that Taiwan should not be “a piece on the chessboard” in a geopolitical game between China and the US. Yeo’s remark is nothing but an ill-intentioned political maneuver that is made by all pro-China politicians in Singapore. Since when does a Southeast Asian nation have the right to stick its nose in where it is not wanted
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures. This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated
During a recent visit to Taiwan, I encountered repeated questions about “America skepticism” among the body politic. The basic premise of the “America skepticism” theory is that Taiwan people should view the United States as an unreliable, self-interested actor who is using Taiwan for its own purposes. According to this theory, America will abandon Taiwan when its interests are advanced by doing so. At one level, such skepticism is a sign of a healthy, well-functioning democratic society that protects the right for vigorous political debate. Indeed, around the world, the people of Taiwan are far from alone in debating America’s reliability
As China’s economy was meant to drive global economic growth this year, its dramatic slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world, with economists and experts criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his unwillingness or inability to respond to the nation’s myriad mounting crises. The Wall Street Journal reported that investors have been calling on Beijing to take bolder steps to boost output — especially by promoting consumer spending — but Xi has deep-rooted philosophical objections to Western-style consumption-driven growth, seeing it as wasteful and at odds with his goal of making China a world-leading industrial and technological powerhouse, and
RSS