Surging interest in artificial intelligence (AI) systems would add further strain to global electricity grids with the potential to rival the massive energy consumption of bitcoin. Thankfully, the premier cryptocurrency has shown us a way to mitigate the impact.
A doubling of data-center revenue at Nvidia Corp last quarter shows that demand for generative applications such as ChatGPT has not yet hit its peak. The US chipmaker is the key provider of shovels in this AI goldrush, but those processors are neither cheap nor lean. Its latest flagship, the GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip, which is the size of a postcard, draws up to 1,000 watts — equivalent to a portable heater.
Although most customers would be opting for something less fancy than the Superchip, they do buy them in bulk to connect together into a massive AI server and that is where the hunger for electricity really kicks in. One study published last year looked at the energy consumption required to train a single large-language model used to output text in multiple languages.
BLOOM from start-up HuggingFace drew on 176 billion parameters from 1.6 terabytes of data. It took a cluster of 384 Nvidia A100 graphics processing units (GPUs) more than 118 days to crunch, the study’s authors said. The electricity consumption from running so many GPUs for so long likely created 24.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide, they estimated. However, the true cost doubles to 50.5 tonnes when you take into account the network connections and idle time of the entire system.
Even then, training a model is just the start. According to one estimate from Amazon.com Inc., which runs its own AI servers, 90 percent of the expense from running artificial intelligence comes in the next phase when users query the model to get results — such as asking ChatGPT for chocolate-cake recipes.
The energy expenditure from implementing the data, called inferencing, is hard to calculate, but it is believed to be roughly in the order of 10 times that required in the first training phase — which means 500 tonnes of carbon dioxide. Moreover, a single generative AI query might have a carbon footprint four times larger than a Google search, one estimate showed.
Brute-force number crunching is built into bitcoin’s design, and helps explain why a wave of chips and servers was rolled out around the world in the hope of mining digital gold. An ongoing study at the University of Cambridge estimates that bitcoin is responsible for 72.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide. That figure could be as low as 3 million tonnes if all bitcoin mines were run on hydroelectricity. (Researchers tend to use the term carbon dioxide equivalent, taking into account the emission of other greenhouse gases, which is then converted into an equivalent measure of carbon dioxide.)
Compared with the wastefulness of cryptocurrency, 500 tonnes of carbon dioxide from a single round of training and deployment seems like nothing. Yet it is still equal to driving 1.6 million kilometers in a gasoline-powered vehicle, or 500 flights from New York to Frankfurt.
And it is still early days. At least a dozen major technology companies are rushing to build and deploy generative AI products, including Amazon.com, Alphabet Inc, Microsoft Corp, OpenAI, Meta Platforms Inc, Baidu Inc, Tencent Holdings Ltd and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Since they are all in a race to outdo each other, they would not sit still once a model has been trained; they would keep buying power-hungry processors to analyze increasingly large amounts of data. Once that is done, they would compete with each other to serve up the results to consumers in the form of college essays, deepfake videos and synthetic versions of Pink Floyd music.
Adding insult to injury is that most AI training is powered by fossil fuels. These server farms have been expanded quickly in existing locations, often thousands of kilometers away from hydroelectric dams or solar power arrays. Since network latency is an issue when responding to Internet requests, they need to be near the end user and not located thousands of kilometers away.
However, bitcoin has already blazed a trail for the AI industry to follow. Cold climates with plenty of renewable energy became the perfect place to plonk down a power-hungry cryptomine, with the artic air and abundant thermal energy of Iceland making the country an ideal choice.
China might also find a new use for the many hydroelectric power stations that attracted mining rigs, but that lost business after it cracked down on the digital currency. Foreign AI providers would not be able to tap in, naturally, but Chinese technology giants know they have such a resource close by as their power needs rise.
There is another upside to switching out bitcoin for AI in these server farms. While the cryptocurrency attracted numerous speculators and billions of dollars in investment, it still failed to add much value to the world. Generative artificial intelligence does not have that problem; just ask ChatGPT.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS