The 823 Artillery Bombardment refers to the conflict that started on Aug. 23, 1958, the day that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) started to shell Kinmen County and Lienchiang County’s Matsu Islands. It was not until Jan. 1, 1979, that the bombardment truly ended.
The reason for the bombardment ending was because the US established diplomatic ties with the PRC, recognizing it as the sole representative of China. Kinmen and Matsu, which historically belonged to China, became an umbilical cord connecting Taiwan and China.
In 1994, then-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Shih Ming-teh (施明德), along with several Kinmen and Lienchiang county councilors, proposed withdrawing troops from the outlying islands.
When the 1950 Korean War erupted, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) proposed the same idea, as maintaining military troops there was a severe financial burden.
Nowadays, Kinmen and Lienchiang have become a symbol between Taiwan and China, and residents of the islands possess an ambiguous identity.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) announced his intention to secure a “Kinmen peace declaration” while pursuing his bromance with Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) under the moonlight in Kinmen. They shared their schemes as they listened to the waves crashing.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Wednesday commemorated the soldiers who died in Kinmen. Meanwhile, Ko and Gou, as well as New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, were in Kinmen as campaign rallies ramp up ahead of next year’s presidential election.
In politics, a “declaration” should refer to a consensus by two or more sides. Gou’s idea for a Kinmen peace declaration would involve Taiwan and China, yet neither has reached a consensus on the matter.
Under the “status quo,” his idea should be a mere “proposal.” That he failed to differentiate between a “declaration” and a “proposal” exposes his lack of political competence, raising questions about his suitability for the position of president.
[Gou has not announced his candidacy.]
In 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed “special state-to-state relations” between the PRC and the Republic of China (ROC), which was in the “proposal” category. Lee would never have confused a proposal with a declaration.
In Lee’s proposal, he seriously contemplated and tried to include China’s perspective.
However, China did not respond well.
Can any of the presidential candidates or potential candidates who are calling for peace, but want to replace Tsai and beat the DPP’s candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) — who were successors of Lee’s spirit — provide a cogent solution?
Years ago I proposed a conservation area in Kinmen and Lienchiang where the ROC could continue to exist. Based on the historical heritage, a free-trade zone could be set up, which could also capitalize on the tourism industry, boosting the local economy. Most importantly, it would be a buffer zone between Taiwan and China.
If residents of Kinmen and Lienchiang agreed, the ROC could be a museum preserving the party-state system in reality, satisfying those who have a historical attachment to that system.
In that way, maybe Taiwan could become a normal country.
On the anniversary of the 823 Artillery Bombardment, hopefully my humble opinions would spur a new discussion about the future of Kinmen and Matsu, giving Taiwan and China more options with which to walk toward peace.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Lee Chieh-yu
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS