Taiwanese Internet celebrity Holger Chen (陳之漢), who often uses chauvinistic and vulgar expressions, has changed. After years of portraying himself as being highly critical of politics, he has started siding with certain politicians over others.
Chen is well within his rights to argue that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should be “discontinued,” while singing the praises of Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), as Taiwan is a democratic and free country.
However, many would say that Chen and Ko are simply using each other to increase their own popularity, and not to further their respective political visions.
On July 16, Chen and former New Power Party legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) collaborated to host a rally. Those in the know understood that the event was meant to elevate the status of the opportunist Ko. As things turned out, when Ko and Chen joined hands, Taiwanese saw how truly misogynistic they were.
Earlier this month, a group for female supporters of Ko’s presidential campaign arranged a performance in which dancers wore sexualized flight attendant outfits. The event was meant to repair Ko’s misogynist image, but it had the opposite effect.
In a livestream, Chen defended the event, saying that DPP Legislator Lai Pin-yu’s (賴品妤) cosplaying also “objectified women.”
It seems that Chen does not know what cosplay is. For years, Lai has been a renowned cosplayer. If Chen has no idea what a cosplayer does, he should have learned some basic information about it before making a comment.
It is almost certain that the number of cosplay fans is larger than that of Chen’s livestream audience. Once Chen’s viewers can no longer stand him, the vocal ones would criticize him directly, and the quiet ones would simply forget him. In any case, Chen’s fan base will decrease day by day, because he has been turning more people away from him.
Hung Yu-jui is a Japanese-language teacher and translator.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS