The US House of Representatives on March 27 passed a bill to revoke China’s “developing country” status. Sponsored by Republican US Representative Young Kim and Democratic US Representative Gerry Connolly, the bill, titled “The People’s Republic of China is Not a Developing Country Act,” was passed by a unanimous vote of 415-0.
It aims to prevent China benefiting from provisions and special treatment in treaties and international organizations, and to undercut its development by recategorizing it as a high-income economy or developed country.
A developing country, also called a less-developed country or emerging market, has low living standards, and an undeveloped industrial base and skills relative to developed countries. More than 120 countries around the world fall into the category, and account for 70 percent of the global population and land area. Until recently, China was considered among them.
However, it is apparent that all of the developing countries and even some developed countries are far behind China in terms of military prowess and economic strength.
In March 2019, then-deputy US trade representative Dennis Shea said during a conference in Geneva, Switzerland, that it no longer makes sense for China to receive developing-nation privileges.
“There is nothing special or differential when a member that has landed a rover on the dark side of the moon ... insists on the same treatment as one of our poorest members,” Shea said.
In June the following year, then-chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific Ted Yoho said that China should no longer be considered a developing country.
As the second-largest economy in the world, China has built five aircraft carriers, developed the Belt and Road Initiative, and has dedicated itself to space projects. Yoho’s points have underscored China’s growing threat to the US and the global community.
For the past decade, China has been directing its economic strength toward its military, endowing its People’s Liberation Army with modern warfare capabilities, such as joint operations, cyberwarfare and space warfare, as well as developing state-of-the-art strategic arms, including stealth aircraft, hypersonic cruise missiles and anti-satellite weapons.
Meanwhile, China has not slowed down its development of nuclear weapons, submarines and the capability to conduct information warfare. The efforts accumulated over the years have enabled China to transform its military into a modern fighting force on a par with those of leading European powers like the UK, France and Germany.
Ranked third for its military strength and second for military spending, China, aside from its military prowess, also demonstrated exceptional capabilities in developing new energy resources, high-speed rail, supercomputers, quantum networks and artificial intelligence.
As China accounted for 18.6 percent of the global economy last year, second only to the US, it cannot continue receiving privileges and treatments in international organizations.
US representatives unanimously passing the bill to deprive China of its developing country status is a wake-up call to the rest of the world: In view of China’s overall power, it should no longer be treated as a developing country, but an authoritarian regime that poses a lethal threat to global security and the economy.
Yao Chung-yuan is an adjunct professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Rita Wang
Many foreigners, particularly Germans, are struck by the efficiency of Taiwan’s administration in routine matters. Driver’s licenses, household registrations and similar procedures are handled swiftly, often decided on the spot, and occasionally even accompanied by preferential treatment. However, this efficiency does not extend to all areas of government. Any foreigner with long-term residency in Taiwan — just like any Taiwanese — would have encountered the opposite: agencies, most notably the police, refusing to accept complaints and sending applicants away at the counter without consideration. This kind of behavior, although less common in other agencies, still occurs far too often. Two cases
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It