Since the government announced the extension of mandatory military service to one year, I have been explaining the new plan in high schools. A female student in her third year asked me: “Can women be conscripted?”
As a female reservist who served in the armed forces for more than 30 years, and after learning that women in at least five countries must serve in the military, I believe that women should be conscripted in Taiwan.
Many have argued that women should not be forced to serve in the military, but they should, for three simple reasons.
First, in addition to gender equality, the issue should be considered part of a citizen’s civic duty. If women are not required to complete mandatory military service, men would see their counterparts as having more privilege.
Second, regardless of gender differences, it is everyone’s responsibility to protect the nation.
Third, although most women cannot undertake some physically demanding work, many can certainly carry out tasks that require careful thinking and attention to detail.
Some female officers, after proper training, are more than capable of driving armored vehicles and flying aircraft at high g-force. As for other female soldiers, they can be assigned to areas including human resource management, intelligence assessment, logistics, electronic communications, information gathering, political warfare — such as propaganda, journalism and psychological operations — and medicine.
Judging from the performance of female officers, women are competent in carrying out all kinds of tasks. Some women perform even better as combat soldiers than some men. In this regard, nothing is impossible and everything can be done.
Until the law is amended to allow women to be conscripted, there are a few problems that the armed forces must deal with. In terms of hardware, it would be extremely difficult to plan and organize barracks and facilities to accommodate a great number of female conscripts. Dormitories and toilets need to be expanded and redesigned.
Without a new budget allocated to achieve such changes, facilities for female soldiers and officers could only be renovated from the ones currently used by men. It could take years to complete the construction and renovation.
Another serious problem is the organization of labor and resources. As mandatory military service is extended to one year, the capacity of the military’s educational resources must be re-evaluated.
Although it might already be adequate for incoming male conscripts, it might not be enough if women are also conscripted. It is likely that the armed forces would not be prepared to train female conscripts in less than a year.
The government and the military could learn from how Finland restored its conscription, or refer to how France planned the incremental implementation of universal conscription. Their examples could provide a way to transition to a new system smoothly and successfully, achieving the goal of “every citizen a soldier.”
Chang Ling-ling is a colonel in the armed forces reserves.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.