The world is witnessing the highest number of protracted violent conflicts since the end of World War II, and inequality and misinformation are fueling the turmoil. Policymakers seeking to curb the violence would be wise to consider their own citizens’ attitudes about inequality and misinformation.
In the US, recent polling from the University of Chicago’s Pearson Institute for the Study and Resolution of Global Conflicts and The Associated Press-NORC (AP-NORC) Center for Public Affairs Research showed that there is much work to be done.
The victims of global violence span social, economic and geographic boundaries. Aside from the Russia-Ukraine war, nearly 30 conflicts are ongoing worldwide. With no resolution in sight, these conflicts have displaced close to 84 million people. Even if the fighting stops in some of these regions, death and trauma would still permeate many communities, uprooting families and dissolving social bonds. These conflicts destroy habitats and deeply scar generational well-being, creating cycles of violence that stretch across generations.
One major trigger of these conflicts is social inequality. Although not as easily observable as death tolls or shifting borders, inequality remains deeply intractable.
Stanford University historian Walter Scheidel says that inequality has been deeply entrenched since the Stone Age, and it rarely subsides without paroxysms of violence.
Women and girls often bear the brunt of social inequality, especially in developing countries. When faced with extreme situations that hinder access to education and employment, their ability to achieve economic parity and stability is severely eroded.
However, inequality is not just a fixture of developing countries. One recent Pearson Institute/AP-NORC survey showed that a majority of Americans believe the US is a leader in protecting minority rights globally, yet nearly one-third say the US has fallen short in protecting such rights at home.
Many Americans also say countries that fail to protect minority rights should not receive aid or be permitted to join international organizations.
In the survey, just 52 percent of women agreed that “global prevention of gender and racial discrimination [is] an essential US foreign policy goal,” while 33 percent said it is “important, but not essential.”
Among men, full support is even weaker. One-third said promoting minority rights abroad is “essential,” while 46 percent said it is “important, but not essential.”
Americans’ mixed commitment to the global promotion of minority rights should worry policymakers who believe the US must lead by example.
Misinformation exacerbates the social problems caused by domestic inequality. Ethnically and religiously motivated violence is of course not new, but spreading vitriol and acquiring lethal technology have never been easier.
Algorithms designed to filter and curate news are hijacked to amplify conspiracies, lies, and hatred. Polarization is one consequence, and it has become a hallmark of our digital age.
Nearly three-quarters of Americans believe misinformation has inflamed extreme political views and fostered hate crimes, including violence motivated by religion, race and gender.
Biased, misleading media coverage stokes fear and causes confusion about real and imagined threats. Misinformation also dramatically erodes trust between Americans and in US institutions. Half of all Americans believe misinformation has decreased citizens’ trust in government.
As with inequality, there is no easy cure for the blight of misinformation, but restored social trust and accuracy in media are urgently needed.
Fortunately, Americans have started to adapt to the new media environment.
In the survey, about 80 percent of respondents reported checking multiple sources at least occasionally to avoid consuming or spreading misinformation. More than three-quarters of respondents also said they refrain from sharing news on social media, and the same share verified news sources at least occasionally, while 63 percent reported using fact-checking Web sites and tools at least some of the time.
The results of the Pearson Institute/AP-NORC polling suggest that US policymakers face a conundrum. If Americans care so little about protecting minority rights globally, and if so many think minority rights are inadequately protected at home, the US is ill-prepared to promote liberal values abroad.
That is why the rise in global violence should prompt US policymakers to take stock of the impact of inequality and misinformation at home. It might be a small start, but internal renewal could help improve the lives of Americans and those struggling with endemic violence around the world.
Sheila Kohanteb, a political scientist, is executive director for external relations and forum executive director at the Pearson Institute for the Study and Resolution of Global Conflict, which hosts the annual Pearson Global Forum at the University of Chicago.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past