Earlier this summer, protests erupted in Uzbekistan’s autonomous Republic of Karakalpakstan after the government announced plans to strip the region of its constitutional status.
Viewing the move as a blow to their identity, the people of Karakalpakstan, especially ethnic Karakalpaks, took to the streets and clashed with police and security forces, leaving 18 dead and 243 injured, including 38 law-enforcement officers.
The episode was both horrific and a notable improvement from 2005, when Uzbek government forces killed hundreds of unarmed protesters in the city of Andijan. The official death toll was 189, but witnesses said that the actual figure is much higher.
Not only were there far fewer casualties this time around, Uzbek authorities were quick to share sensitive details of the event.
Moreover, Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev swiftly agreed to the protesters’ demands, declaring that Karakalpakstan would retain its autonomous status. This brought the unrest to a rapid end. In fact, Mirziyoyev lifted the month-long state of emergency he declared on July 2 after less than three weeks.
This was no small feat, especially given the region’s history of ethnic conflict. To appreciate it, one need only recall the clashes between Uzbeks and Meskhetian Turks in Uzbekistan in 1989, and between ethnic Uzbeks and Kyrgyz in the Osh region of Kyrgyzstan in 1990 and 2010.
The Uzbek authorities’ success in restoring stability drew praise from the leaders of Uzbekistan’s Central Asian neighbors. Russian President Vladimir Putin also weighed in, as did the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The US and the EU, however, expressed concern over the violence and called for a full, credible and transparent investigation into the events.
The prospect of losing autonomous status clearly spurred the protests in Karakalpakstan, but on July 6, Mirziyoyev’s press secretary, Sherzod Asadov, suggested that the upheaval was “prepared for years by foreign forces,” whose “main goal is to encroach on the territorial integrity of Uzbekistan and create an inter-ethnic conflict.”
This might call to mind accusations made by then-president Islam Karimov after the Andijan violence: Western powers, he claimed, were attempting to orchestrate a “color revolution.” The episode upended Uzbekistan’s relations with the West for at least a decade.
However, Mirziyoyev is no Karimov.
Since coming to power in 2016, Mirziyoyev has promoted regional cooperation, released political prisoners, introduced measures to ban forced labor, improved media freedom and implemented many more positive reforms.
In 2019, foreign direct investment in Uzbekistan increased by more than 150 percent, and The Economist named Uzbekistan the world’s “most improved” country.
Mirziyoyev wants to be taken seriously as a progressive and trustworthy leader, so could his government’s claims about the protests be true?
One should first consider which outside force could possibly orchestrate such large protests. Uzbekistan is no fledgling state: Unlike its Central Asian neighbors, statehood preceded the arrival of the Russian Empire.
Since not just anyone can undermine the unity of a mature country, the most likely culprit would be a major foreign power, even a global superpower.
However, regional destabilization is not in the interest of Uzbekistan’s giant neighbors, Russia and China. Both would prefer a prosperous and confident Central Asia to a poor and volatile region, which could become a source of extremism, terrorism, poverty and mass migration.
The same is true of the West, which has always supported Central Asian countries’ independence and development, and thus have no reason to oppose Mirziyoyev. In fact, the US and Europe are the leading foreign investors in the region, by a large margin. With Russia and China also holding major stakes in Uzbekistan’s economy, it seems unlikely that any of the world’s biggest powers would be eager to sow instability there.
It is far more likely that the protests were driven mainly by widespread poverty, high unemployment and climate change. While reforms are undoubtedly a step in the right direction, economic development takes time.
The good news is that Uzbekistan has significant economic potential, not least owing to considerable primary energy resources. The country’s proven reserves are estimated at about 1.8 trillion cubic meters of gas, 600 million barrels of oil, and 1.9 billion tonnes of coal. Karakalpakstan, in particular, is home to substantial natural-gas fields, the development of which would create jobs and fill the regional government’s coffers.
However, as neighboring Kazakhstan’s experience shows, hydrocarbon-rich countries are hardly immune to protests, and the people of Karakalpakstan have plenty of other grievances. The desiccation of the Aral Sea has caused widespread land degradation and desertification, and also resulted in the release of toxic chemicals that accumulated in the lake — once the world’s fourth-largest — during Soviet times, when upstream farmers used pesticides intensively to increase crop yields. As a result, the people of Karakalpakstan suffer from water shortages and poor health.
Climate change is expected to exacerbate these trends. It is estimated that, by 2050, Central Asia is forecast to lose two-thirds of its glaciers — and thus its water — relative to 1960 levels.
However, aside from natural resources, Uzbekistan stands to benefit from a population that understands what it means to be a unified people under a single government, and it has leaders who are committed to preserving their country’s independence and advancing its development.
One hopes that, far from being a harbinger of further unrest, the violence spurs more positive reforms.
Djoomart Otorbaev is a former prime minister of Kyrgyzstan.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past