When dozens of Tunisian judges went on strike last month to protest the sacking of 57 of their colleagues, lurid posts containing damaging allegations about some of the female jurists began appearing on Facebook.
One said police had ordered a virginity test to be carried out on one of them in 2020, attaching an image purporting to be the medical report. Another targeted judge Khaira bin Khalifa, saying falsely that she had once been charged with adultery, a crime in Tunisia.
“I was destroyed, and my family was defamed for the sake of settling personal scores,” bin Khalifa told an emergency meeting of the Tunisian Judges’ Association.
The judges’ strike began after the mass sacking of judges early last month by Tunisian President Kais Saied, who called Monday’s referendum over a new constitution that would formalize his sweeping seizure of powers.
In Tunisia and other Arab states, the malicious posting of personal information on social media — known as “doxxing” — is increasingly being used to harass and intimidate women, anti-government protesters and LGBTQ+ advocates.
“Doxxing is a repressive tactic, especially when used against the most vulnerable in society such as women and queer activists,” said Marwa Fatafta from Access Now, a digital rights group.
“Essentially, your personal information is turned into a weapon pointed against you,” said Fatafta, the organization’s policy manager for the Middle East and North Africa region.
The increasing presence of women online and the rising popularity of social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter has made doxxing and other forms of online harassment such as so-called “revenge porn” and “sextortion” more widespread.
A UN Women survey last year of eight Arab nations including Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia found that about half of female Internet users felt unsafe due to online harassment.
“Online violence represents a serious threat to the women’s physical safety and mental well-being,” the report said, adding that many women who were targeted opted for self-censorship or withdrew from online spaces altogether.
Across the region, several countries have laws aimed at curbing online abuse and harassment of women.
A 2017 Tunisian law addressing violence against women contains a broad definition of violence, including economic, sexual, political and psychological abuse.
Egypt, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia also penalize harassment on social media platforms, while Morocco’s Penal Code refers to various types of online violence.
However, implementation is patchy, Cairo Center for Development and Law director Entessar el-Saeed said.
“The authorities do not enforce the laws,” she said, adding that many women were too scared to report online sexual abuse — fearing social stigma and protracted legal proceedings that often lead nowhere.
Online harassment can have tragic consequences in the socially conservative region.
During the past year, two Egyptian teenagers died by suicide after being blackmailed with threats to post intimate photographs online.
Several female journalists and advocates in the region had their intimate photographs and chat logs leaked online last year after their devices were hacked with Pegasus spyware.
Government authorities have not commented on the hacks.
The doxxing attacks on the protesting judges were the latest such incidents in Tunisia since Saied moved against parliament last year, giving himself the right to rule by decree.
Pro-government groups shared the photos, telephone numbers and home addresses of dozens of women and LGBTQ+ protesters in a bid to silence them, Fatafta said.
In some cases, doxxing has been used in the region to hold public officials to account. Activists in Lebanon shared the personal details and real-time locations of politicians they blamed for the country’s financial collapse.
In lieu of effective state measures to tackle harmful doxxing, digital rights groups and local advocates are leading efforts to clamp down on the practice.
Access Now has a digital security helpline to support advocates and journalists, and flags doxxing cases to social media platforms — lobbying them to make it easier for victims to report.
In Egypt, a platform called Qawem, meaning resist in Arabic, supports women who are exposed to sextortion and online abuse.
The nonprofit — which has about 980,000 followers on Facebook and 10,000 followers on Instagram — receives hundreds of messages every day from women who are being blackmailed or abused online, founder Mohammed Elyamani said.
Hundreds of female volunteers offer psychological support, investigate complaints and try to help victims reach a solution, Elyamani said.
Social media platforms are not doing enough to crack down on online harassment on their sites, said Rasha Abdulla, a professor of journalism and mass communication at the American University in Cairo.
“It takes a minute to defame someone on social media, and in our region, platforms have been extremely lazy about eliminating doxxing cases,” she said.
“Personal data usually takes a lot of time to be taken down, and usually after the harm has already been done,” she added.
Facebook and Twitter did not respond to requests for comment.
After the women judges in Tunisia were doxxed last month, a group of human rights organizations called for a law on cyberviolence against women, as concern grows about a wider rights crackdown after Monday’s constitutional referendum.
“This constitution needs clear and straightforward articles about protecting women from online abuse,” el-Saeed said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS