The US Department of State has approved the potential sale of military technical assistance to Taiwan worth an estimated US$108 million — the fifth such deal under the administration of US President Joe Biden. The announcement came on Friday before a delegation led by former US secretary of defense Mark Esper arrived in Taiwan on Monday.
Similar to a weapons sale approved last month, the latest deal also does not contain any big-ticket items, and instead focuses on logistical support items and spare parts to help the military maintain its vehicles and combat systems.
The news has met a mixed response. Retired army general and deputy director of National Chengchi University’s Taiwan Center for Security Studies Richard Hu (胡瑞舟) welcomed the announcement, saying that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has forced the military to become more pragmatic and value the importance of logistics and equipment availability rates.
Senior military officials regularly receive rosy reports on availability rates from military units, but any military officer knows that a cursory inspection of the situation on the ground would reveal a significant discrepancy between reported equipment availability rates and reality, Hu said.
Some military commentators, including Chieh Chung (揭仲), a researcher at the Association of Strategic Foresight, asked whether the lack of new equipment sales might signify a policy change by the Biden administration. Taken into consideration with the abrupt postponement — and possible cancelation — of several weapons system purchases, the concern might be valid. In May, the Ministry of National Defense announced significant delays in the delivery of US-manufactured M109A6 “Paladin” self-propelled howitzers vital to the modernization of the army’s field artillery. The US attributed the delay to a congested production line, but the ministry signaled that it had given up on the purchase and was looking for an alternative.
Some in Taiwan speculated at the time that Washington might have blocked the sale because it was unhappy with the direction of Taiwan’s military modernization program, and wanted Taipei to invest more funds in asymmetrical warfare capabilities, rather than expensive conventional weaponry such as fighter jets and tanks.
Speaking to reporters yesterday, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) said that the government is still waiting for a price quotation for the 66 F-16V Block 70 “Viper” warplanes approved for sale in August 2019 by the administration of then-US president Donald Trump.
AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles, which would give the air force’s F16s cross-strait strike capability, is another weapons system first requested by the ministry in 2014 and approved by the Trump administration that has yet to be sold and delivered to Taiwan.
Taiwan has been making great strides toward the development of asymmetric capabilities, most notably with its indigenous missile program. Ironically, the nation had to conceal flight tests for its medium-long range surface-to-surface Yun Feng (雲峰, “Cloud Peak”) missile program during the late 1990s and early 2000s to avoid blowback from Washington.
Meanwhile, a government source on Monday said that the Executive Yuan is preparing to allocate funds to produce seven additional indigenous submarines. Submarines are perhaps the ultimate asymmetric weapons platform: Their ability to lurk underwater undetected, sneak up on and attack surface ships makes them a true force multiplier.
Discussions on defense are necessarily conducted behind closed doors; hopefully the situation is better than it appears from the outside. Taiwanese are not after handouts or free equipment from the US, but simply ask for the tools and training they need so that they can defend their nation.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) has motioned to abolish the “Wu Sz-huai” (吳斯懷) clauses of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) — which forbid all Taiwanese who enter China from engaging in any activities detrimental to national security or interests. This motion led the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) to report her for infringing upon the National Security Act (國家安全法), which Weng called a lawless and undisciplined attempt to threaten a legislator. However, the true lawless and undisciplined person is Weng — the one standing in the enemy
RSS