The US Department of State has approved the potential sale of military technical assistance to Taiwan worth an estimated US$108 million — the fifth such deal under the administration of US President Joe Biden. The announcement came on Friday before a delegation led by former US secretary of defense Mark Esper arrived in Taiwan on Monday.
Similar to a weapons sale approved last month, the latest deal also does not contain any big-ticket items, and instead focuses on logistical support items and spare parts to help the military maintain its vehicles and combat systems.
The news has met a mixed response. Retired army general and deputy director of National Chengchi University’s Taiwan Center for Security Studies Richard Hu (胡瑞舟) welcomed the announcement, saying that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has forced the military to become more pragmatic and value the importance of logistics and equipment availability rates.
Senior military officials regularly receive rosy reports on availability rates from military units, but any military officer knows that a cursory inspection of the situation on the ground would reveal a significant discrepancy between reported equipment availability rates and reality, Hu said.
Some military commentators, including Chieh Chung (揭仲), a researcher at the Association of Strategic Foresight, asked whether the lack of new equipment sales might signify a policy change by the Biden administration. Taken into consideration with the abrupt postponement — and possible cancelation — of several weapons system purchases, the concern might be valid. In May, the Ministry of National Defense announced significant delays in the delivery of US-manufactured M109A6 “Paladin” self-propelled howitzers vital to the modernization of the army’s field artillery. The US attributed the delay to a congested production line, but the ministry signaled that it had given up on the purchase and was looking for an alternative.
Some in Taiwan speculated at the time that Washington might have blocked the sale because it was unhappy with the direction of Taiwan’s military modernization program, and wanted Taipei to invest more funds in asymmetrical warfare capabilities, rather than expensive conventional weaponry such as fighter jets and tanks.
Speaking to reporters yesterday, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) said that the government is still waiting for a price quotation for the 66 F-16V Block 70 “Viper” warplanes approved for sale in August 2019 by the administration of then-US president Donald Trump.
AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles, which would give the air force’s F16s cross-strait strike capability, is another weapons system first requested by the ministry in 2014 and approved by the Trump administration that has yet to be sold and delivered to Taiwan.
Taiwan has been making great strides toward the development of asymmetric capabilities, most notably with its indigenous missile program. Ironically, the nation had to conceal flight tests for its medium-long range surface-to-surface Yun Feng (雲峰, “Cloud Peak”) missile program during the late 1990s and early 2000s to avoid blowback from Washington.
Meanwhile, a government source on Monday said that the Executive Yuan is preparing to allocate funds to produce seven additional indigenous submarines. Submarines are perhaps the ultimate asymmetric weapons platform: Their ability to lurk underwater undetected, sneak up on and attack surface ships makes them a true force multiplier.
Discussions on defense are necessarily conducted behind closed doors; hopefully the situation is better than it appears from the outside. Taiwanese are not after handouts or free equipment from the US, but simply ask for the tools and training they need so that they can defend their nation.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS