It feels like Singapore has only just switched from combating the COVID-19 pandemic with some of the developed world’s strictest curbs to plunging headlong into a fight against inflation.
The central bank tightened policy three times since late last year. Now, the highly urbanized island that imports most of what it eats has a front-row seat to food nationalism. Neighboring Malaysia, from which Singapore gets one-third of its poultry, banned chicken exports from Wednesday, citing domestic shortages and price spikes.
While the embargo is often framed as dour news for fans of hawker dishes such as chicken rice, more consequential risks lurk in the background. Singapore receives many of the building blocks of modern life from its northern neighbor: power, water, labor and food.
While the government has worked hard over the years to reduce dependence on agricultural imports, with kale farms inside former industrial warehouses and fisheries springing up on vacant lots, food security is a long-term project.
The world has become more protectionist and politically contested, creating real challenges for Singapore. Not only does the city-state need to worry about availability of supplies — as it did during border closures early in the pandemic — but how lower stocks accelerate rapid price increases that affect every corner of life, from fuel and electricity bills to rent and groceries.
Channel News Asia, a local network, recently profiled a family that cut shower time in half because of climbing utility costs. Core inflation is the highest in a decade.
The full effect of the ban was not yet apparent on May 28. In the afternoon, the poultry section at a Cold Storage supermarket on Orchard Road had been cleaned out. By contrast, the shelves at a Fairprice supermarket in the northern suburb of Punggol were full the following afternoon — the bulk of chicken from Malaysia.
Still, it was hard to miss the sign urging shoppers to purchase no more than required, consider protein substitutes, and be patient and responsible, while the store worked on securing more stock.
The government also says it has built up critical supplies of food and there is no need to panic.
Other sources of chicken include Australia, Brazil and the US, but it is clear that any potential shortage is a small part of a larger battle.
“This time it is chicken, next time it may be something else,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) told reporters on Friday. “We have to be prepared for this. It’s a very unsettled world and inflation is a problem, cost of living is a problem, but in the scheme of things, many more disruptive things can happen than just some price adjustments, and we are seeing some of that now.”
Malaysia, for its part, is facing the toxic mix of rising demand as feed and fertilizer costs soar, thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Chicken farmers say they are being squeezed and expect to have to scale back production.
Poultry is not a big export, but if the government adopted the same tactics for more significant products, such as palm oil, the consequences would be much more severe. That does not bode well for buyers of the country’s fish and vegetables.
Nor is Malaysia the only culprit of protectionism in the region. India plans to restrict sugar exports after barring wheat sales, and Indonesia blocked — then unblocked — foreign exports of palm oil. Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha said his country should join forces with Vietnam to jointly raise rice prices and buttress their bargaining power.
Preparations for extreme weather could be exacerbating the trend.
“The emerging specter of food protectionism may have its roots in agriculture’s two-year spate of bad weather, which has caused crop yields to wither and turbocharged food inflation,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Alvin Tai wrote in a recent report.
A healthy US harvest and the anticipated benign turn in the La Nina climate cycle could turn things around, he said.
In the days after Malaysia’s announcement, I went to one of the famous hawker centers in downtown Singapore. At the Tong Fong Fatt Hainanese Boneless Chicken Rice stall at Maxwell Food Center, I asked to speak to the manager.
“The boss?” the grumpy, harried stall attendant asked.
He then pointed toward two photographs in the neon signboard, of Lee and his father, Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), the first prime minister of Singapore.
The state is the driving force in economic and social life in Singapore, where chicken is more than just popular fare. It is a protein that all three main communities — ethnic Chinese, Malay and South Asian — can enjoy. That might be why, as politically fraught as the ban may be, government officials and domestic media have been careful to avoid directly criticizing Malaysian Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob, who goes to the polls in less than a year.
If a market solution does not present itself soon, a diplomatic one should. In its absence, neighborly goodwill might quickly become strained, and the chicken ban could be a bitter taste of things to come.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for economics.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
RSS