It feels like Singapore has only just switched from combating the COVID-19 pandemic with some of the developed world’s strictest curbs to plunging headlong into a fight against inflation.
The central bank tightened policy three times since late last year. Now, the highly urbanized island that imports most of what it eats has a front-row seat to food nationalism. Neighboring Malaysia, from which Singapore gets one-third of its poultry, banned chicken exports from Wednesday, citing domestic shortages and price spikes.
While the embargo is often framed as dour news for fans of hawker dishes such as chicken rice, more consequential risks lurk in the background. Singapore receives many of the building blocks of modern life from its northern neighbor: power, water, labor and food.
While the government has worked hard over the years to reduce dependence on agricultural imports, with kale farms inside former industrial warehouses and fisheries springing up on vacant lots, food security is a long-term project.
The world has become more protectionist and politically contested, creating real challenges for Singapore. Not only does the city-state need to worry about availability of supplies — as it did during border closures early in the pandemic — but how lower stocks accelerate rapid price increases that affect every corner of life, from fuel and electricity bills to rent and groceries.
Channel News Asia, a local network, recently profiled a family that cut shower time in half because of climbing utility costs. Core inflation is the highest in a decade.
The full effect of the ban was not yet apparent on May 28. In the afternoon, the poultry section at a Cold Storage supermarket on Orchard Road had been cleaned out. By contrast, the shelves at a Fairprice supermarket in the northern suburb of Punggol were full the following afternoon — the bulk of chicken from Malaysia.
Still, it was hard to miss the sign urging shoppers to purchase no more than required, consider protein substitutes, and be patient and responsible, while the store worked on securing more stock.
The government also says it has built up critical supplies of food and there is no need to panic.
Other sources of chicken include Australia, Brazil and the US, but it is clear that any potential shortage is a small part of a larger battle.
“This time it is chicken, next time it may be something else,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) told reporters on Friday. “We have to be prepared for this. It’s a very unsettled world and inflation is a problem, cost of living is a problem, but in the scheme of things, many more disruptive things can happen than just some price adjustments, and we are seeing some of that now.”
Malaysia, for its part, is facing the toxic mix of rising demand as feed and fertilizer costs soar, thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Chicken farmers say they are being squeezed and expect to have to scale back production.
Poultry is not a big export, but if the government adopted the same tactics for more significant products, such as palm oil, the consequences would be much more severe. That does not bode well for buyers of the country’s fish and vegetables.
Nor is Malaysia the only culprit of protectionism in the region. India plans to restrict sugar exports after barring wheat sales, and Indonesia blocked — then unblocked — foreign exports of palm oil. Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha said his country should join forces with Vietnam to jointly raise rice prices and buttress their bargaining power.
Preparations for extreme weather could be exacerbating the trend.
“The emerging specter of food protectionism may have its roots in agriculture’s two-year spate of bad weather, which has caused crop yields to wither and turbocharged food inflation,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Alvin Tai wrote in a recent report.
A healthy US harvest and the anticipated benign turn in the La Nina climate cycle could turn things around, he said.
In the days after Malaysia’s announcement, I went to one of the famous hawker centers in downtown Singapore. At the Tong Fong Fatt Hainanese Boneless Chicken Rice stall at Maxwell Food Center, I asked to speak to the manager.
“The boss?” the grumpy, harried stall attendant asked.
He then pointed toward two photographs in the neon signboard, of Lee and his father, Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), the first prime minister of Singapore.
The state is the driving force in economic and social life in Singapore, where chicken is more than just popular fare. It is a protein that all three main communities — ethnic Chinese, Malay and South Asian — can enjoy. That might be why, as politically fraught as the ban may be, government officials and domestic media have been careful to avoid directly criticizing Malaysian Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob, who goes to the polls in less than a year.
If a market solution does not present itself soon, a diplomatic one should. In its absence, neighborly goodwill might quickly become strained, and the chicken ban could be a bitter taste of things to come.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for economics.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s democracy and high-tech economy play a crucial role in global affairs and are central to the world’s embrace of a raft of next-generation technologies, including AI. It is underpinned by a security relationship with the United States that’s existed in several iterations since 1949 and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) retreat from China. A central pillar of that security relationship is the American willingness to sell arms to Taiwan. Indeed, since 1979 it has been embedded in US law, with the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) charging the US with helping to improve the island’s ability to deter an attack from
Academia Historica director Chen Tsui-lien (陳翠蓮), speaking at the handover ceremony for her new role on Monday, said that when she accepted the position, she knew that her peaceful life as a history professor was a thing of the past, and that from now on she would have to “wear a helmet.” A specialist in Taiwan’s post-World War II history and the 228 Incident, she has been accused of being politically divisive. A phrase she used in her acceptance speech set headlines alight this week, putting her in the sights of editorials in blue-leaning media. She said opposition figures calling for
EDITORIAL CARTOON
Taiwanese-Americans, lawmakers and civic groups marched through Manhattan on Saturday last week in support of Taiwan’s participation in the UN. Marshall Islands Permanent Representative to the UN John Silk joined the demonstration, saying he hoped Taiwan would one day be able to participate in UN meetings as a member, and Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Yi-chuan (王義川) took part while visiting New York City with a delegation. Taiwanese communities in Vancouver held a “UN for Taiwan” event. The campaign comes as the 81st UN General Assembly gets under way. In Taipei, President William Lai (賴清德) said China was deliberately misinterpreting UN