Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) last week sketched a chart showing projected numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections in an attempt to explain his preferred pandemic-prevention strategy.
The chart was in fact straight from the pages of a public health textbook, first shown by the Central Epidemic Command Center two years ago at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. It has since formed the basis of the government’s pandemic prevention plans. It was also used by Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) to illustrate his city’s approach to the pandemic.
Whether to pursue a policy of “zero COVID-19” or live with the virus is a question that China is dealing with. It has become an ideological struggle between supporters of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and his rivals in the run-up to the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th National Party Congress later this year.
However, the pandemic prevention measures pursued in Taiwan over the past two years have never been about achieving zero cases at all costs. They have been largely aimed at keeping the virus under control and moving toward a form of herd immunity, which is essentially a scientific way of saying “living with the virus.”
At the start of the pandemic, Taiwan was faced with a virulent disease that produces severe symptoms. There was no vaccine, a lack of medical supplies, an insufficient supply of surgical masks and sanitizing products, and limited numbers of hospital beds. During this time, the country was still trying to figure out the virus’ transmission path.
The objective in the pandemic response back then was to prevent an explosion in the number of severe cases from collapsing the health system, which would make us lose control of the virus.
For this reason, it was thought proportionate to try to reduce the speed of virus transmission, even if this goal came at a relatively high social cost, so that the medical system would have the capacity to cope with severe cases. It would buy time until a vaccine was developed and distributed, and allow for hope that the virus might mutate into a weaker strain that would cause less severe symptoms.
With these conditions in place, the country could then hope to achieve some form of herd immunity.
Today, Taiwan has adequate vaccine coverage. The Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 is more easily transmitted, but it largely produces no or less severe symptoms. The medical system is fairly stable.
The question therefore becomes whether Taiwan needs to maintain the social costs of pandemic restrictions to control the virus. The country has reached the point where people can once more discuss how best to further refine our allocation of resources and our control measures. In public administration, policy support measures are the goals and means of coordination in key areas to achieve the overall strategy and objectives.
Therefore, in the process of fighting the pandemic, these measures have to take into account the circumstances at any given point in time, including the capacity of the medical system, the corresponding social costs and the policy tools at hand to meet objectives and prioritize resource allocation.
As part of the policy discussion, the government needs to explain the entire policy framework and connections in a structured way, and to provide key data in a timely manner, such as the number of hospitalized patients that fully recover. The public needs to understand what the government is trying to achieve in its overall strategy, and how the results demonstrate success.
In this way, it can fend off critics who clamor for attention, and guide the nation out of the pandemic in the final stretch.
Shih Chia-liang is an adjunct assistant professor at National Chengchi University’s Department of Public Administration.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS