It is a costly expedition, through some of the roughest seas in the world, to reach the Antarctic peninsula. A journey through Drake Passage to Subarea 48.1 faces treacherous weather, where waves can reach 12m high.
And yet it is a risk that 14 vessels considered worth taking last year alone, as countries increasingly venture into the Antarctic to catch a species with great value to the billion — dollar health supplement industry: krill.
Each roughly the size of a paperclip, Antarctic krill is the most abundant species on Earth. There are an estimated 400 million tonnes of krill in the Antarctic alone. It is a key link in the food chain: krill contributes iron and other nutrients that fertilize the ocean, and is a vital food source for wildlife, including whales, penguins and seals.
Illustration: Constance Chou
It also plays an integral part in the carbon cycle. The Southern Ocean is one of the largest carbon sinks in the world and krill are so numerous that they can influence atmospheric carbon levels. One study found that krill can remove up to 12 billion tonnes of carbon from the Earth’s atmosphere.
While krill have long been used in aquaculture to fatten farmed fish, krill oil has become a gold rush for the dietary supplements industry in the past decade. Marketed as a superior and sustainable alternative to fish oil pills, Antarctic krill products are touted as more effective in delivering omega — 3 fatty acids to the bloodstream than fish oil, which has been linked to improved heart and brain health — among many other benefits. And there is no fishy aftertaste.
With growing concerns about overfishing and the quality of fish oil, producers also promote krill products as a premium and more environmentally friendly substitute. One bottle sold on Amazon promises krill “sustainably harvested from pristine waters to ensure maximum nutrient quality.”
However, for all the claims of sustainability, the rise in demand has seen quotas reached with alarming speed. A recent cross-border investigation into the global fishing industry by the Environmental Reporting Collective found that in the past year, catch limits for Antarctic krill in Subarea 48.1 were reached in 69 days, as opposed to an average of 130 days over the previous five years.
“It’s pretty worrisome when you’ve got fisheries exploring these ‘unexploited’ areas or discovering large stocks of fish,” says Teale Phelps Bondaroff, director of research at OceansAsia. “This really should raise eyebrows, because what’s really driving that expansion? Krill oil is obviously one factor.”
The international organization that manages the Antarctic krill fishery, the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), insists that its practices do not disrupt the marine ecosystem.
Krill vessels monitor their own locations, it says, and diligently report their catch to CCAMLR, which sets strict catch limits around the Antarctic.
However, it is clear that in some areas — the most vulnerable ones, according to conservationists, including Bondaroff — those limits are being disrupted as countries rush to join the race.
China is building the world’s largest Antarctic krill trawler, scheduled to be completed in 2023, and the country more than doubled its catch of Antarctic krill from 50,423 tonnes in 2019 to 118,353 tonnes last year. Russia, too, is investing US$640 million in krill fishing and South Korea is also registering more ships.
The retail krill oil industry is projected to grow by more than 13 percent by 2023, although most of the krill catch still goes to feeding fish, pets and livestock. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing animal food industry, and Antarctic krill offer more nutrients and fewer pollutants, making it particularly attractive for farmed salmon.
“It’s growing, and I think it’s a question of ‘can the fishery be effectively managed before it expands further?’” says Nicole Bransome, of Pew’s Protecting Antarctica’s Southern Ocean project.
Last year, more than half of the krill was caught by one company: Aker BioMarine. The largest industry player since the 1990s, it is part of the Aker empire controlled by Norwegian billionaire Kjell Inge Rokke. The company, which spans oil and gas, construction, marine biotechnology and energy, acknowledges that the catch has been going up in recent years, but insists: “We want to harvest, of course, but we want to secure our harvesting potential for 10 or a hundred years we need to be in a place where our activity is accepted by a wide range of stakeholders.”
Although there are only about a dozen krill fishing vessels in the Antarctic, their number belies their impact. The ships are floating factories, some the size of soccer fields, capable of vacuuming up more than 1,000 tonnes of krill a day.
“It’s not like you could just take a small boat and go and start to harvest krill,” says Ekaterina Uryupova, visiting fellow at Washington’s Arctic Institute. “You have to prepare yourself and be ready for all kinds of weather, for all kinds of situations. Then you have to find the best location to catch krill, and then once your fridges are full, you have to cover the same distance back.”
Conservationists fear fishing is concentrated in areas crucial to species that depend on krill as a food source.
“The fishery was fishing over and over in certain areas close to the coast where on one side are colonies of penguins and on the other side are areas popular for foraging whales,” the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition’s Rodolfo Werner says.
Most vessels operate in Area 48, an immensely biodiverse region that is home to more than 62 million tonnes of krill.
In 2010, CCAMLR set a catch limit of 620,000 tonnes across four areas to prevent concentrated fishing. In theory, once the limit is reached, all krill fishing must stop until the next year.
Krill fishing is within the limit, but last year’s catch in Area 48 was almost 450,000 tonnes, up by 15 percent from the year before.
Subarea 48.1 has the smallest limit, 155,000 tonnes, due to its significant ecological importance. Colonies of penguins and seals live close to the shore, and in the summer whales feed on krill.
Conservationists are concerned that the catch limit has been reached eight times in the past decade.
“If you’re really pushing up to the last number of krill that you can pull out of the water, that doesn’t give any buffer for challenges like climate change,” Bondaroff says.
Even within Subarea 48.1, fishing is concentrated in a tiny pocket.
Between 2010 and 2018, 74 percent of the total catch there came around the Bransfield Strait, which represents only 8 percent of the area. In another region, Subarea 48.3, it was even more concentrated. Ninety-five percent of the catch came from just 5.6 percent of the area.
“So they’re not overfishing in the entire Antarctic, but if you look at these very small areas, they are. And that’s what actually matters to the wildlife there,” says Bransome, who fears the quotas are so low and cover such a wide area that they fail to prevent such concentrated fishing.
Next month, in a pivotal moment for krill, CCAMLR’s 26 members, 25 countries and the EU, are to decide at the group’s annual meeting whether to revise catch limits for Area 48, or eliminate them altogether — which would happen if no agreement is reached.
“And that would allow the fishery to really concentrate their catch. If that happens, that could be quite destructive to the ecosystem,” says Phil Trathan, a conservation biologist at the British Antarctic Survey.
CCAMLR argues that catches of krill in the Southern Ocean are a precautionary levels.
It says that less than 1 percent of krill in the Antarctic is fished annually.
“This is one of the few resources that is still underexploited in a very big way in the global oceans,” David Agnew of the CCAMLR says.
However, with a higher interest in krill, scientists are concerned about the effect on the food chain.
“You cannot have an infinitely contracting and concentrating fishery with an increasing number of actors being involved and no change in that structure. Something has to change,” says Andy Lowther, a quantitative ecologist at the Norwegian Polar Institute. “Either the quota needs to go up or the area needs to expand or fewer actors need to be involved in the fishery.”
Research from last year suggests that concentrated krill fishing is reducing locally available amounts of krill, which has badly affected penguins , including population declines for certain species.
“When you’re fishing for krill, what you’re doing will affect the whole ecosystem, because every species in Antarctica feeds on krill or on another species that feeds on krill,” Werner says.
Changes to krill populations are proving to be critical, too. A study published in June said that krill populations are projected to fall by 30 percent by 2100, due to the climate crisis.
The Antarctic peninsula is among the fastest-changing regions, warming almost 3°C over the past 50 years.
In particular, krill are shifting south toward the pole as the ocean warms. If krill continue moving south, less food would be available for predators, such as seals and penguins, in sub-Antarctic islands.
“We’re not dealing with a static system. It’s changing because of the warming planet,” Trathan says. “I would say we’re heading towards one of the most challenging years.”
A 2019 study revealed that krill are already facing increasing difficulty in replenishing their population at Southern Ocean’s northern edge, close to Area 48.
“It really speaks to what we’re doing to our oceans in general — that we fished so much that we now have to go down to this place that’s at the bottom of the world,” Bransome says.
For China observers, especially those in Taiwan, the past decade has brought awareness of an increasing obsession by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with control. It seeks to control not simply national policy, but all aspects of its citizens’ lives. Not a week passes without some new aspect of Chinese life being brought under CCP control. This forces obvious questions: Why this obsession? And what is driving it? When any one-party state, which already controls government, yet seeks to expand and tighten that control, it bodes ill. With a country the size of China, it bodes ill for Taiwan, Asia and the
Taiwan is now entering a period of maximum danger from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) due to an accelerating Chinese military challenge now emboldened by a shocking dive in American strategic credibility occasioned by its humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan. This means there is a much higher chance that in the next one to three years CCP leader Xi Jinping (習近平) may order the PLA to invade Taiwan because he believes the PLA can win and that the Americans can be dissuaded from coming to Taiwan’s aid in time. It is still possible for Taiwan and Washington
Another year, and another UN General Assembly is convening without Taiwan. Today marks the opening of the assembly’s 76th session at the UN headquarters in New York City, with the option to attend remotely because of the COVID-19 pandemic, which once again promises to be its main focus under the theme “Building resilience through hope.” As they do every year, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and overseas compatriot groups are organizing campaigns to call for Taiwan’s participation in the global body. However, unlike previous years, Taiwan seems to be riding a higher wave of support than usual. The pandemic has exposed countless shortcomings
In an op-ed on Friday, Chen Hung-hui (陳宏煇), a former university military instructor, applauded the government’s efforts to reduce the “supply, demand and harm of cannabis.” (“Cannabis use booms on campuses,” Sept. 10, page 8). Chen recounted a story of a boy who partied with the “wrong crowd,” smoked cannabis and died. This story cannot be true, because cannabis is not deadly. Consuming too much can feel mighty unpleasant, but it will not kill a person. This fact is not only backed up by science and statistics from the US Centers for Disease Control, but is well-known in countries where cannabis