It started with a book of kid’s fairy tales, and is culminating in a defining test of a nation’s democracy and even its future in the EU.
Hungary’s weaponization of gay rights has led to a showdown rarely seen between the bloc and a member state. Brussels is threatening action over an LGBTQ law that could involve cutting funds to Budapest. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban proposed to put what he calls the protection of children against homosexual content to a referendum.
“When the pressure on our homeland is so great, then only the will of the people is able to defend Hungary,” Orban said in a Facebook post on Wednesday, three days before Budapest hosted its biggest-ever Pride March, and perhaps its bravest.
Illustration: Yusha
The reality is that the EU has finally come to the realization that it has an antagonist it needs to take on. Over the past seven years alone, Orban has teased out the loopholes to get Hungary a net 25 billion euros (US$29.5 billion) of European money. All the while, he has been openly defying EU values, even more brazenly under the cover of the COVID-19 pandemic.
He cemented his control over the media, the judiciary and education, triggering condemnation in European capitals, but little action. Last week, Hungary was identified as the only European country that used Pegasus spyware to keep an eye on critics of the government.
The targeting of LGBTQ rights became more overt in October last year with attacks on an anthology called Fairyland Is For Everyone. Stories include a prince who ends up growing his blond hair long and trying on dresses, a gender nonconforming deer and a gay Roma boy.
The book snowballed into its own unwitting David-and-Goliath story pitting the LGBTQ community against an increasingly authoritarian leader. Rather than collateral damage in eastern Europe’s populist shift of the past few years, it turned into a lightning rod for resistance after becoming a word-of-mouth hit and selling 30,000 copies in Hungary.
Yet it took on new meaning when the Hungarian parliament last month voted to ban minors being exposed to any kind of portrayal of homosexuality or sex reassignment, a tipping point for the EU.
“It’s turned into a symbol, for people who are fed up with the government,” said one of the publishers, Dorottya Redai, 48. “We expected some public reaction, but at the volume it came, we were surprised. We were accused of corrupting children.”
The ban on depictions of homosexuality to minors was packed in an anti-child-abuse law, a move that critics say equated being gay with pedophilia and would therefore prey on a parent’s worst fears. Stores that do not prominently label books as having “non-traditional content” face a fine. Teachers cannot introduce them at their schools.
The issue is that kids can be “so easily influenced,” said Lenard Borbely, mayor of Csepel, a working-class district of Budapest.
He is one of several municipal leaders from Orban’s Fidesz party who banned the book in kindergartens.
“When a beautiful princess is brought in front of a prince for marriage and instead he likes her brother or when a boy is urged to wear girl’s clothes and not to be ashamed of it, then that’s when I say this has no place,” said Borbely, a father of three girls.
Redai says that message has become pervasive in a country that used to be a relatively sanguine place for the gay community compared with other parts of the former Eastern Bloc.
Interviews with several mothers in Hungary suggest she is right. Nora Kiraly, founder of the Association for Young Families, said she has no problem with gay people, she just does not want their way of life to get airing in public. A mother-of-five, she supports the government’s line.
“If happy same-sex couples are visible everywhere all the time, then that’s going to be what kids wish for,” Kiraly said. “We shouldn’t pretend that something is natural, what isn’t natural.”
Other parents are more conflicted. Julia Majzik-Pota agonizes about what to tell her one-year-old son: “A few years back I would not have thought that I would have to whisper in secret that homosexuality exists.”
“I naively thought we had progressed over time, that society would become more and more accepting, but now it seems they have let the genie out of the bottle,” she said. “It’s hard for me to understand how we got here in the 21st century.”
Indeed, it perhaps was not meant to be this way in Hungary, certainly compared with staunchly Catholic Poland, whose leadership is also targeting LGBTQ people as enemies of the state. When he won a first stint in power in 1998, the youthful Orban was a poster child of eastern Europe’s push to integrate with its western neighbors. It joined the EU six years later, along with seven other former communist states.
The erosion of LGBTQ rights mirror Orban’s transformation into ringleader for Europe’s populists, harnessing the resentment toward “liberal elites” and immigration that also worked so well for former US president Donald Trump and Britain’s Brexit campaigners.
“Orban is playing on this feeling, playing with the deepest fears,” Redai said. “A country with an autocratic leader works by creating enemies. They incite hatred against different vulnerable groups of people: the Jews, the Roma, refugees and now LGBTQ people.”
Over time, the 58-year-old Hungarian leader simultaneously limited the hard-earned freedoms that came with the lifting of the Iron Curtain. The pandemic allowed Orban to act with even greater impunity as he declared a state of emergency to rule by decree. A law banning legal gender recognition for transgender people was passed during the first lockdown.
“Government officials have a huge responsibility when it comes to restraining or whipping up emotions, especially with all the pent-up angst and frustration from the pandemic,” said Vera Messing, researcher at the Center for Social Sciences in Budapest. “That’s why it’s really dangerous to mix pedophilia and homosexuality because then you get the frightening scenes where homophobes suddenly feel empowered to act on their impulse.”
On Saturday, Budapest held Gay Pride in what its director, Adam Csikos, described a “revolutionary atmosphere.”
Back in 2007, marchers were violently assaulted by extremists, but since then, the festival — the oldest and biggest of its kind in central Europe — has only grown.
It was a pivotal weekend less than a year before Orban is to seek a fourth straight term in next year’s elections. After more than a decade of pushing an anti-EU narrative, the bloc is more popular than ever, and losing membership and freedom to travel and work within its borders would be unthinkable for many Hungarians.
So far, Orban has succeeded in pushing the EU’s buttons, but also knowing when to dial back. Brussels, for its part, is trying to break the cycle of being a dog with lots of bark, but no bite. At the EU summit last month, leader upon leader rounded on Orban.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte straight up said Hungary “has no business being in the European Union any more.”
Others were more personal. Luxembourg Prime Minister Xavier Bettel, who is gay, put it directly to Orban: “I didn’t get up one morning after having seen an advert on the TV of some brand.”
“That’s not how life works. It’s in me, I didn’t choose it,” he said.
Orban, for now, is digging in. His referendum plan makes it less likely that billions of euros of EU pandemic funding will be released quickly.
For Redai, the question is how to turn back.
“The reality is that the government slogan, ‘We are protecting children,’ is working,” she said. “Child protection gets the attention of a lot of parents.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath