It is hard to imagine a more luxurious place to spend two weeks of quarantine than the Anantara Phuket Suites & Villas in Thailand, where visitors are pampered in private residences that can have their own pool and courtyard.
Yet more than three months after the resort and more than 100 like it reopened to extended-stay travelers in an attempt to revive Thailand’s battered economy, foreign arrivals have failed to meet even rock-bottom expectations. Just 346 overseas visitors have entered the country on average each month on special visas since October last year, according to Thailand Longstay Co, which helps facilitate the program.
That is well below the Thai government’s target of about 1,200 and a tiny fraction of the more than 3 million who came before the COVID-19 pandemic.
The tepid response to Thailand’s highly publicized reopening illustrates the difficulties facing tourist-dependent countries as they try to shore up economic growth, while also protecting their citizens from COVID-19 before vaccines become widely available.
Thailand had hoped to lure retirees escaping the European winter and others who could stay for an extended period. They would have to go through quarantine, but that could be done in the comfort of high-end resorts in a country that had been relatively unscathed by the pandemic. After two weeks, Thailand would be theirs to roam for as long as nine months.
The lack of interest is adding pressure on Thai policymakers, who have struggled to accommodate industry players calling for relaxed quarantine rules and public health experts warning against putting people in danger.
All the while, as the beaches stay empty, many tourism-related companies are going out of business. To make matters worse, COVID-19 cases have jumped in the country.
“It’s really challenging to balance the demands of the tourism industry and locals,” Phuket Tourist Association president Bhummikitti Ruktaengam. “I understand how hard it is to be stuck in a room for 14 days. I’ve done it. But the safety of the people gets priority because tourists come and go, but locals live here.”
In 2019, Thailand received more than US$60 billion in tourism revenue from about 40 million visitors. The industry contributed about one-fifth to GDP before the pandemic, compared to about 10 percent globally.
However, six months without any foreign arrivals followed by months with just a trickle has battered the sector. At least 931 registered tourism-related companies closed last year, according to a Bloomberg News analysis of data from the Thai Ministry of Commerce. The real number is probably much higher, as many tourism businesses are not registered in any database.
On Thailand’s famed resort islands, the situation is particularly bad.
Take Phuket, which got about 90 percent of its tourism income from foreign visitors before the pandemic. At Patong, its main tourist town, a once busy street of bars and nightclubs lies empty. Bangla Road is lined with shuttered businesses, with chairs stacked on tables and chains barring access. Dust gathers on the barstools and countertops. The few places that are open have barely any customers.
“When there are no foreigners, the area is just empty,” said Rungarun Loiluen, who works at The Kitchen, a restaurant and bar at the end of Bangla Road.
She is one of eight employees who kept their jobs from about 30 before the pandemic, albeit with fewer working hours.
“There’s barely anyone walking down the road,” she said.
On the next block over, Hotel Clover Patong Phuket has slashed its prices by as much as 75 percent to attract domestic travelers instead of its usual clientele of American, Russian and Chinese tourists.
Still, it ran at about 10 percent occupancy last month, a period that used to be overbooked, said Jessada Srivichian, a financial manager at the hotel.
Despite the government’s efforts to help tourism businesses, such as subsidizing the cost of hotel rooms, meals and airfares, domestic tourists who usually travel just on weekends cannot fill the gap left by foreign visitors.
Even though only about half the country’s hotels have reopened, the average occupancy rate is only about 34 percent, Thai Tourism Authority Governor Yuthasak Supasorn said in an interview last month.
“I’ve been in Phuket for 20 years and have never seen it this quiet,” Jessada said. “We need international visitors. We’re not thinking of making a profit, but instead focusing on minimizing losses, because as long as there’s a quarantine requirement, people won’t come.”
The government should consider waiving the two-week isolation requirement for visitors from regions of countries with no local infections for more than 60 days, Thai Travel Agents Association president Vichit Prakobgosol said in late September last year.
He was hoping to have the rule relaxed for visitors from some parts of China, Thailand’s biggest source of tourism income. However, no such deal was concluded.
“It seems impractical to double the duration of a trip to satisfy the local quarantine requirements,” said Ron Cooper, an American photographer and business consultant who traveled abroad for leisure several times a year before the pandemic. “Add to that the cost of staying in a hotel for two unproductive weeks — not a very attractive proposition.”
Thailand’s approach contrasts with other tourism destinations that have been less cautious.
The Maldives in July last year reopened to overseas tourists without requiring a quarantine, although a negative COVID-19 test was needed. The archipelago has seen more than 172,000 arrivals since then, Maldives Immigration data showed.
While new infections increased in the aftermath, they have since declined.
“It was bold, daring to open up the Maldives with all the risks attached to it,” said Dirk de Cuyper, chief executive officer of S Hotels & Resorts, whose occupancy rate at Maldives properties was 70 percent last month.
That might be bad news for Thailand, he said.
“Many travelers won’t buy into quarantine, particularly when other countries are opening up and they have no quarantine rules,” he added.
Most Thais opposed the reopening plan and are unlikely to want relaxed quarantine rules, partly because local residents live close to the resorts, unlike in the Maldives, where properties are often isolated on their own islands.
“If I had to choose between health and income, I’d choose health,” said Wiparad Noiphao, a fruit and vegetable vendor at Banzaan fresh market in Patong. “We have to prioritize safety.”
As a compromise, Thailand’s COVID-19 task force discussed shortening the quarantine period to 10 days.
However, that has yet to be implemented because of concerns about new infections. The government has also approved six golf resorts as quarantine centers.
“Any modification to the original plan would mean higher risks,” said Thira Woratanarat, an associate professor at Chulalongkorn University’s Faculty of Medicine.
“There are many examples of free international travel that led to a resurgence,” he said, giving the example of Europe. “We should wait until the global virus situation has improved.”
A resurgence of COVID-19 has also weakened the case for easing quarantine rules. Thailand has seen cases more than double to more than 11,000 in less than a month.
An outbreak that began in seafood markets and migrant communities has spread throughout the country. The government curbed travel in some high-risk regions, but has so far refrained from imposing a broad lockdown. It has also extended its travel-subsidy program.
Ultimately, the country would not fully reopen until COVID-19 vaccines are widely available, government officials have said.
Thailand plans to offer the shot developed by Sinovac Biotech to healthcare workers and those with underlying conditions before the end of next month. From May, it will give one by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford, aiming to inoculate at least 33 million people, about half the nation’s population, by the end of this year.
Questions remain about how international tourism would function as more people become vaccinated worldwide. Vaccine passports are seen as a way to get people traveling again, but whether and how they would be implemented is still unclear. It is not even known whether vaccinated people can transmit the virus.
Taking all this into account, the Bank of Thailand estimates that even next year, overseas visitors would still fall well short of the 40 million in 2019. It projects that 5.5 million people would visit this year and 23 million next year.
Thailand’s economy is estimated to have contracted 6 percent last year, the biggest decline since the Asian financial crisis.
It is projected to expand 3.5 to 4.5 percent this year, the Thai Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council said.
Despite the hit to the economy, Bhummikitti said that Thailand’s cautious reopening plan was the correct option, and the embattled tourism industry has little choice but to wait for vaccines to take hold.
“We can’t close our borders forever, and we can’t let people in without strict measures in place,” Bhummikitti said. “So this controlled, gradual reopening is the best approach.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS