Not long ago, someone made a petition on the government’s Public Policy Network Participation Platform asking that the start and end hours of junior and senior-high schools be changed to 9:30am and 5pm.
The petitioner said that the new schedule would shorten the long school day and keep students from dozing off in class, hampering their learning.
Within just a few days of the posting, the number of cosigners reached above the threshold for a motion, but of course the government is unlikely to pass it.
Three years ago, someone proposed that Taiwan follow the US and Europe by shortening the school day to six hours, from 9am to 3pm.
The Ministry of Education said: “If school hours were reduced, the total number of class hours would be insufficient, and there would be less time for student activities during breaks.”
The new motion proposes a school day of 9:30am to 5pm, for a total of 7.5 hours. Removing the self study session before the first class and the elective eighth class — the “tutoring course,” which high schools cannot force students to take — would still leave enough class hours to meet the new curriculum guidelines.
Schools simply need to fine tune their daily schedules.
Revising the hours would solve the problem of tests being scheduled on Monday to Friday mornings during the self study sessions — despite the ministry telling schools not to do it — and the problem of students being unfairly labeled by teachers when they skip the eighth class — despite the ministry telling schools not to force them to take the tutoring course.
Unfortunately, the person who proposed the motion failed to strengthen their argument with these two points. Instead, they merely said that students might feel drowsier going to school earlier — probably an insufficiently strong rationale for changing the current hours.
Students mainly feel drowsy in the morning because they went to bed late the night before. This could result from staying up too late to study, because there is too much homework. If that is the case, the issue to be discussed is whether schools are giving students too much homework or too many tests, rather than changing the school hours.
If students are tired because they needed to attend cram school after regular school hours, the issue to be discussed is why parents are sending their children to cram school every day, adding to their exhaustion after having spent nine hours at regular school.
If students are exhausted because of excessive cellphone use, resulting in poor time management and lack of sleep, then they should reflect on their own behavior rather than discuss changing the school hours.
Considering things from the students’ perspective, many student are undeniably exhausted because of their busy schedules on and off campus — the multitude of tests, the volume of homework and the many hurdles of college admission.
Although the government is unlikely to pass the motion to change the school day to 9:30am to 5pm, student exhaustion caused by long school hours is an undeniable fact. Perhaps exhaustion due to overwork is what the government should tackle first.
Bob Chiu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS