A train pulls into the Odenplan subway station in central Stockholm, where morning commuters without masks get off or board before settling in to read their smartphones.
Whether on trains or trams, in supermarkets or shopping malls — places where masks are commonly worn in much of the world — Swedes go about their lives without them.
When most of Europe locked down their populations early in the pandemic by closing schools, restaurants, gyms and even borders, Swedes kept enjoying many freedoms.
The relatively low-key strategy captured the world’s attention, but at the same time it coincided with a per capita death rate that was much higher than in other Nordic countries.
Now, as infection numbers surge again in much of Europe, the country of 10 million people has some of the lowest numbers of new COVID-19 cases and only 14 virus patients in intensive care.
However, whether Sweden’s strategy is succeeding is still uncertain.
Its health authorities, and in particular chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, keep repeating a familiar warning: It is too early to tell, and all countries are in a different phase of the pandemic.
That has not stopped a WHO official from saying that the continent could learn broader lessons from Sweden that could help the virus battle elsewhere.
“We must recognize that Sweden, at the moment, has avoided the increase that has been seen in some of the other countries in western Europe,” WHO Europe Senior Emergency Officer Catherine Smallwood said on Thursday last week. “I think there are lessons for that. We will be very keen on working and hearing more from the Swedish approach.”
According to the European Center for Disease Control, Sweden reported 30.3 new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the past two weeks, compared with 292.2 in Spain, 172.1 in France, 61.8 in the UK and 69.2 in Denmark, all of which imposed strict lockdowns early in the pandemic.
Overall, Sweden has had 88,237 reported infections and 5,864 fatalities from the virus, or 57.5 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants since the beginning of the pandemic.
The way Sweden’s strategy was viewed outside the country seems to depend largely on what stage of the pandemic the observer was experiencing at the time. Initially, many abroad were incredulous at images of Swedes dining with friends in restaurants or sipping cocktails on the Stockholm waterfront. Some were envious that Swedish businesses were not forced to close.
Then came shock as the virus ripped through the country’s nursing homes and hospices.
By the middle of April, more than 100 deaths were reported each day in Sweden, while mortality rates were falling elsewhere in Europe.
Today, as fears of a second wave grow across Europe, it is fashionable to praise Sweden, with reporters from France, the UK and elsewhere traveling to Stockholm to ask about its success.
However, a Swedish government commission investigating the handling of the pandemic will, undoubtedly, have hard questions to answer: Did authorities wait too long to limit access to nursing homes, where about half of the deaths occurred? Were they too slow to provide personal protective equipment to staff in those homes when shortcomings in the elderly care sector had long been known? Why did it take so long to set up wide-scale testing?
Tegnell also refuses to rule out a second wave of infections in Sweden. A particular concern is the return of students to high schools for the first time since March.
“We need to be very careful and find the first sign that something is going on so that we can do as much as possible to prevent it from escalating,” he said.
Localized outbreaks are expected, but rather than fight them with nationwide rules, officials plan to use targeted actions based on testing, contact tracing and isolating patients rapidly.
“It’s very important that we have quick and local response to hit down the virus without making restrictions for the whole country,” Swedish Minister of Health Lena Hallengren said last week.
From the beginning, health officials argued that Sweden was pursuing a sustainable approach toward the virus that the population could adopt — for years, if necessary.
“This is a marathon, not a sprint,” became a slogan repeated by ministers at every opportunity, given that neither a vaccine nor a cure yet exist.
While the rest of the world watched with envy at the freedoms that Swedes enjoyed amid lockdowns elsewhere, there were not as many as people have assumed. Gatherings were capped at 50 and congregating at bars was banned.
Most of the changes involved voluntary actions by citizens, rather than rules imposed by the government.
This trust given to the population to shoulder personal responsibility in the pandemic puts Sweden at odds with most other countries that used coercive measures such as fines to force compliance.
This is often attributed to a Swedish model of governance, where large public authorities comprised of experts develop and recommend measures that the smaller ministries are expected to follow.
In other words, the people trust the experts and scientists to develop reasonable policies, and the government trusts the people to follow the guidelines.
Swedes were asked to work from home when possible and maintain a social distance, and most willingly complied. While people now ride public transportation without masks, there are also far fewer people commuting than before.
Unlike most European countries that have mandated wearing masks in public spaces, Sweden does not recommend their broad use and people largely follow that recommendation.
Health officials say that masks used outside healthcare facilities by untrained personnel can provide a false sense of safety that could see sick people leave home and ignore social distancing.
Instead, they believe simple but nonnegotiable guidelines provide clear rules that can stay in place for long periods: staying home when showing symptoms of COVID-19, maintaining good hand hygiene and keeping social distance.
Most Swedes believe that wearing masks makes little sense.
Carol Rosengard, 61, who runs a center for disabled young people, has seen people wear masks improperly or take them off to smoke a cigarette or drink water.
“That’s not how they should be handled,” Rosengard said, explaining her support for not imposing mask rules on the population.
That view is echoed by Hallengren, who does not totally dismiss the effectiveness of masks and sees their usefulness in cases of severe local outbreaks.
At the same time, she rejects blanket rules for the entire country.
“People will not wear masks for years,” she said.
Additional reporting by Jan Olsen and Vanessa Gera
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS