New Power Party Legislator Claire Wang (王婉諭) has proposed amending the oft-criticized Crime Victim Protection Act (犯罪被害人保護法), which she has described as “very crude” and inferior to its Western counterparts, something she knows all too well from personal experience.
The act has mainly been used to regulate compensation for victims, not ensuring their rights are respected, and the government has not done enough to inform victims of the legal assistance available to them, Wang told a news conference on Friday last week.
The act, which was promulgated in 1998, seems to come under fire every time a serious crime occurs, such as the fatal stabbing of a railway police officer in July last year — whose father died a few days after his son’s attacker was acquitted on mental health grounds in May — and the murder of a scooter rider in March.
Civic campaigners in March 2016 raised many of the same criticisms, citing the government-sponsored Association for Victims Support’s “narrow focus” on monetary compensation, and calling for a one-stop legal and psychological support system where association members and other entities would work closely with the victims’ loved ones.
They continue to call for the same improvements.
Dealing with the aftermath of a crime is very traumatizing and confusing for the victim and their family members, and compensation is just the minimum that the government can do to help them get through the grueling process, which can include collecting evidence and testifying, navigating complicated legalese and in the worst cases — overseeing an autopsy.
Sensitivity is crucial during such times, which seems to be one of the major problems that politicians and advocates bring up.
However, even the process to receive compensation is convoluted, Wang said, adding that it is the government’s responsibility to help crime victims, but they are often made to feel as if they are being done a favor.
Wang, whose three-year-old daughter was beheaded in a random attack by a mentally disturbed man in Taipei in 2016, recalls being handed a huge stack of papers after the murder, and felt that the help she received came with little warmth or sympathy.
She said that while applying for compensation, she was asked: “Do you still feel sad?”
The association cannot bear all of the blame, as it only has about 60 full-time staff and 119 part-timers across the nation, who last year handled nearly 2,000 new cases, helped 73,394 individuals and still had to help with fundraising for the organization.
The association is supervised by the Ministry of Justice and its board is mostly composed of government personnel.
Wang says that support for victims should be expanded into a comprehensive network that facilitates cooperation and communication between various government departments, as well as the families of victims and civic organizations.
The act only covers people who are killed, seriously wounded or sexually assaulted. If it cannot provide enough help, its coverage definitely needs to be restructured and expanded to include more resources.
Wang is looking to overhaul the system, which seems to be long overdue.
It is time to take a comprehensive look at this issue, instead of waiting for another tragedy to happen to get more lawmakers and government officials interested in tackling the necessary reforms.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view