Teachers and professors face crackdowns as authorities fight for the minds of an antagonistic young generation. Thousands of educators in Hong Kong expect the coming weeks to be a nervous time as they prepare for a new academic year.
In just a month’s time, universities, schools and even kindergartens across the territory are to be placed under unprecedented scrutiny as they resume classes for the first time after the new National Security Law passed last month, amid calls for the “bad apples” among teachers to be purged.
Teachers and schools have come under scathing attack from government officials and the pro-establishment camp since the anti-government protest movement roiled Hong Kong a year ago. Professors and teachers have been widely blamed for “poisoning” young minds with an allegedly heretical and radical agenda, and for producing a young generation antagonistic toward the authorities.
Illustration: Yusha
Just in the past week, two academics active in politics have been dismissed. This took place the same week as the arrests of four student activists on national security charges and the disqualification of 12 pro-democracy candidates for the legislative election.
Benny Tai (戴耀廷), a law professor and one of the founders of the 2014 “Umbrella movement” — much vilified in the Chinese state press — was fired by the University of Hong Kong on Tuesday. Tai was jailed last year on public nuisance charges for leading the civil disobedience movement.
China’s liaison office in Hong Kong hailed his sacking “a deed of justice” and accused him of “inciting” students. The China-owned daily Wen Wei Po said it was a long-overdue “riddance of a cancer” from the university.
Tai said his dismissal “marks the end of academic freedom in Hong Kong,” and he was “heartbroken to witness the demise of my beloved university.”
Shiu Ka-chun (邵家臻), a pro-democracy lawmaker and lecturer in social work who has taught at the Hong Kong Baptist University for 11 years, said he was “shocked” by his employer’s refusal to renew his contract.
Shiu, also jailed last year for “inciting public nuisance” in the occupy protests, was removed from teaching duty in January while the university launched disciplinary proceedings linked to his conviction.
“They are settling accounts with people who have participated in the occupy movement, and are prosecuting us through law and our career,” Shiu said. The Baptist University declined to comment on his case.
Hong Kong Secretary for Security John Lee (李家超) vowed to get rid of the “bad apples” in the education sector responsible for poisoning Hong Kong’s youths in an interview published in the China-owned daily Ta Kung Po on Thursday.
Lee said the authorities would “seriously punish the public enemies” and aim to eradicate “the virus that was endangering national security” within two years. The National Security Law mandates the government step up supervision of schools and academic institutions.
Lee, a member of the new Committee for Safeguarding National Security of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, said his first priority would be to “deal with the schools,” citing statistics that around 40 percent of those arrested in the anti-government protests were students and over 100 were teachers.
Over the past few months, the Hong Kong Education Bureau has indeed taken a series of measures to bolster its supervision of schools, teachers and students. In June, it told schools to discipline students or teachers who protest against Beijing’s imposition of the national security legislation. Around the same time, the bureau said that new teachers need to complete a mandatory training program on professional conduct and national development.
The bureau has banned students from shouting political slogans and singing protest songs at school, and told schools that they could call the police if students showed disrespect toward the Chinese national anthem.
A music teacher who allowed her students to sing a protest song at their music exam also had her contract terminated. Soon after public libraries pulled several books by pro-democracy figures, the bureau reportedly asked schools to review their library books to comply with the new law, which prohibits acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces.
If schools do not cooperate with the bureau’s investigation of teachers accused of “conduct issues,” it could even revoke the headmaster’s and teachers’ licenses. Teachers and professors who spoke to the British newspaper the Guardian likened the intimidation they face to that during the Cultural Revolution — the tumultuous political movement in China that targeted intellectuals and other privileged classes.
Patrick Mo, a teacher who has received a warning from the education bureau over a comment on his social media, said: “It is like being in the Cultural Revolution — every word you say can be used against you. You worry about getting into trouble so you self-censor.”
A history teacher who posted online remarks critical of police brutality during the protest last year found himself censured by police unions and the education authorities. He felt intimidated by scathing comments in the pro-Beijing press and groups protesting at the gate of his school. He kept his job, but was barred from teaching liberal studies, a subject that has been widely blamed for “corrupting young minds.”
“I have to be careful with every word I say now. We daren’t discuss protests and political issues any more,” he said.
Critics said the attacks on outspoken academics and teachers over their political stance bodes ill for academic freedom in Hong Kong. Shiu said academic institutions cannot be truly excellent unless scholars have freedoms of speech and thought.
“You cannot do research in a bird’s cage. It’s very bad education for our young people to be aware of red lines and no-go areas, and then they have to toe the line,” Shiu said.
Chan Kin-man (陳健民), a former professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and cofounder of the 2014 movement who was released from jail earlier this year, said the Chinese authorities intended to launch a “thought reform” agenda, much like the political movements that targeted intellectuals in past decades.
“For issues involving China, that will be standard answers that are favorable to the regime and bolster the one-party rule,” he said. “Hong Kong will enter an anti-intellectual era where no independent thinking would be allowed.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing