Teachers and professors face crackdowns as authorities fight for the minds of an antagonistic young generation. Thousands of educators in Hong Kong expect the coming weeks to be a nervous time as they prepare for a new academic year.
In just a month’s time, universities, schools and even kindergartens across the territory are to be placed under unprecedented scrutiny as they resume classes for the first time after the new National Security Law passed last month, amid calls for the “bad apples” among teachers to be purged.
Teachers and schools have come under scathing attack from government officials and the pro-establishment camp since the anti-government protest movement roiled Hong Kong a year ago. Professors and teachers have been widely blamed for “poisoning” young minds with an allegedly heretical and radical agenda, and for producing a young generation antagonistic toward the authorities.
Just in the past week, two academics active in politics have been dismissed. This took place the same week as the arrests of four student activists on national security charges and the disqualification of 12 pro-democracy candidates for the legislative election.
Benny Tai (戴耀廷), a law professor and one of the founders of the 2014 “Umbrella movement” — much vilified in the Chinese state press — was fired by the University of Hong Kong on Tuesday. Tai was jailed last year on public nuisance charges for leading the civil disobedience movement.
China’s liaison office in Hong Kong hailed his sacking “a deed of justice” and accused him of “inciting” students. The China-owned daily Wen Wei Po said it was a long-overdue “riddance of a cancer” from the university.
Tai said his dismissal “marks the end of academic freedom in Hong Kong,” and he was “heartbroken to witness the demise of my beloved university.”
Shiu Ka-chun (邵家臻), a pro-democracy lawmaker and lecturer in social work who has taught at the Hong Kong Baptist University for 11 years, said he was “shocked” by his employer’s refusal to renew his contract.
Shiu, also jailed last year for “inciting public nuisance” in the occupy protests, was removed from teaching duty in January while the university launched disciplinary proceedings linked to his conviction.
“They are settling accounts with people who have participated in the occupy movement, and are prosecuting us through law and our career,” Shiu said. The Baptist University declined to comment on his case.
Hong Kong Secretary for Security John Lee (李家超) vowed to get rid of the “bad apples” in the education sector responsible for poisoning Hong Kong’s youths in an interview published in the China-owned daily Ta Kung Po on Thursday.
Lee said the authorities would “seriously punish the public enemies” and aim to eradicate “the virus that was endangering national security” within two years. The National Security Law mandates the government step up supervision of schools and academic institutions.
Lee, a member of the new Committee for Safeguarding National Security of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, said his first priority would be to “deal with the schools,” citing statistics that around 40 percent of those arrested in the anti-government protests were students and over 100 were teachers.
Over the past few months, the Hong Kong Education Bureau has indeed taken a series of measures to bolster its supervision of schools, teachers and students. In June, it told schools to discipline students or teachers who protest against Beijing’s imposition of the national security legislation. Around the same time, the bureau said that new teachers need to complete a mandatory training program on professional conduct and national development.
The bureau has banned students from shouting political slogans and singing protest songs at school, and told schools that they could call the police if students showed disrespect toward the Chinese national anthem.
A music teacher who allowed her students to sing a protest song at their music exam also had her contract terminated. Soon after public libraries pulled several books by pro-democracy figures, the bureau reportedly asked schools to review their library books to comply with the new law, which prohibits acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces.
If schools do not cooperate with the bureau’s investigation of teachers accused of “conduct issues,” it could even revoke the headmaster’s and teachers’ licenses. Teachers and professors who spoke to the British newspaper the Guardian likened the intimidation they face to that during the Cultural Revolution — the tumultuous political movement in China that targeted intellectuals and other privileged classes.
Patrick Mo, a teacher who has received a warning from the education bureau over a comment on his social media, said: “It is like being in the Cultural Revolution — every word you say can be used against you. You worry about getting into trouble so you self-censor.”
A history teacher who posted online remarks critical of police brutality during the protest last year found himself censured by police unions and the education authorities. He felt intimidated by scathing comments in the pro-Beijing press and groups protesting at the gate of his school. He kept his job, but was barred from teaching liberal studies, a subject that has been widely blamed for “corrupting young minds.”
“I have to be careful with every word I say now. We daren’t discuss protests and political issues any more,” he said.
Critics said the attacks on outspoken academics and teachers over their political stance bodes ill for academic freedom in Hong Kong. Shiu said academic institutions cannot be truly excellent unless scholars have freedoms of speech and thought.
“You cannot do research in a bird’s cage. It’s very bad education for our young people to be aware of red lines and no-go areas, and then they have to toe the line,” Shiu said.
Chan Kin-man (陳健民), a former professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and cofounder of the 2014 movement who was released from jail earlier this year, said the Chinese authorities intended to launch a “thought reform” agenda, much like the political movements that targeted intellectuals in past decades.
“For issues involving China, that will be standard answers that are favorable to the regime and bolster the one-party rule,” he said. “Hong Kong will enter an anti-intellectual era where no independent thinking would be allowed.”
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
Over the past year, the world has observed what many of us in the US Congress have warned about for years: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is an unreliable partner intent on chasing its ambitions to be the world’s superpower at the expense of its people, its partners and the international community at large. In December last year, the CCP had evidence that a new strain of the coronavirus was infecting and killing Chinese citizens at an alarming rate. Their response was to censor medical professionals and lie to their own people out of fear of tarnishing China’s global image, and
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become