It seems that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus has finally learned how to discharge its duties as a diligent and conscientious opposition party.
On Sunday last week, KMT legislators barricaded themselves inside the Legislative Yuan’s main chamber in protest against the government’s nomination of former Presidential Office secretary-general Chen Chu (陳菊) to head the Control Yuan.
The lawmakers appeared fortified with an unshakeable will. They chanted in unison: “We won’t end the occupation until we achieve our goal.”
The public watched in trepidation and said: “These fellas look serious.”
“But, hold on a minute — how come there’s no air-conditioning? It’s getting really stuffy in here,” soon sounded from the legislative chamber.
Emulating the tactics of the 2014 Sunflower movement, KMT caucus whip Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) went outside to speak to the press.
The occupation had no time limit — the longer the better, Lin said, but added: Ideally it would last three days and three nights.
Oh, and by the way, would the government mind turning on the lights and air-conditioning? Lin asked, adding that pan-blue camp legislators would otherwise need to leave the legislative chamber.
After the torment of a hot and stuffy night, on Monday morning last week, power was finally restored. As the lights flickered back on, glorious waves of mechanically cooled air soothed the fevered brows of KMT legislators.
Then at noon, after a grand total of 19 hours, the occupation ended and KMT legislators were munching their boxed lunches.
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislative Speaker You Si-kun (游錫堃) announced that he would convene a cross-party discussion, KMT lawmakers interrupted him by banging water bottles on desks and shouting slogans to indicate their strong opposition.
What a sight to behold: The awe-inspiring righteousness of the KMT lawmakers will doubtless inspire generations to come.
Contrast the KMT’s tokenistic occupation with the Sunflower movement, which was a true grassroots movement initiated by student activists and civic groups. During their occupation of the Executive Yuan in 2014, the protesters managed to hold out for almost 23 days without water or electricity and under pressure from the far superior strength of the police. All supplies to keep them going were donated by members of the public. After the occupation, 17 people were arrested and charged, such as Dennis Wei (魏揚), who received a four-month jail sentence.
The Sunflower movement fills the pages of history books, while the KMT’s occupation might be nothing more than a footnote. What about their demands?
After enjoying the air- conditioning, wolfing down their lunches, crushing scores of water bottles and achieving wall-to-wall media coverage with their spirited performance, what did they achieve? Rather embarrassingly, it seems precious little.
Aside from a posse of hardcore KMT supporters outside the Legislative Yuan, wider public support was conspicuous in its absence.
KMT Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) has promised that the occupation was “just the beginning.”
Excellent. Please organize a similar occupation, preferably one for each legislative session. Your comically inept political stunts will greatly add to the gaiety of the nation. Keep up the good work.
Ku Pang-yu is a resident of Miaoli County
Translated by Edward Jones
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS