It seems that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus has finally learned how to discharge its duties as a diligent and conscientious opposition party.
On Sunday last week, KMT legislators barricaded themselves inside the Legislative Yuan’s main chamber in protest against the government’s nomination of former Presidential Office secretary-general Chen Chu (陳菊) to head the Control Yuan.
The lawmakers appeared fortified with an unshakeable will. They chanted in unison: “We won’t end the occupation until we achieve our goal.”
The public watched in trepidation and said: “These fellas look serious.”
“But, hold on a minute — how come there’s no air-conditioning? It’s getting really stuffy in here,” soon sounded from the legislative chamber.
Emulating the tactics of the 2014 Sunflower movement, KMT caucus whip Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) went outside to speak to the press.
The occupation had no time limit — the longer the better, Lin said, but added: Ideally it would last three days and three nights.
Oh, and by the way, would the government mind turning on the lights and air-conditioning? Lin asked, adding that pan-blue camp legislators would otherwise need to leave the legislative chamber.
After the torment of a hot and stuffy night, on Monday morning last week, power was finally restored. As the lights flickered back on, glorious waves of mechanically cooled air soothed the fevered brows of KMT legislators.
Then at noon, after a grand total of 19 hours, the occupation ended and KMT legislators were munching their boxed lunches.
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislative Speaker You Si-kun (游錫堃) announced that he would convene a cross-party discussion, KMT lawmakers interrupted him by banging water bottles on desks and shouting slogans to indicate their strong opposition.
What a sight to behold: The awe-inspiring righteousness of the KMT lawmakers will doubtless inspire generations to come.
Contrast the KMT’s tokenistic occupation with the Sunflower movement, which was a true grassroots movement initiated by student activists and civic groups. During their occupation of the Executive Yuan in 2014, the protesters managed to hold out for almost 23 days without water or electricity and under pressure from the far superior strength of the police. All supplies to keep them going were donated by members of the public. After the occupation, 17 people were arrested and charged, such as Dennis Wei (魏揚), who received a four-month jail sentence.
The Sunflower movement fills the pages of history books, while the KMT’s occupation might be nothing more than a footnote. What about their demands?
After enjoying the air- conditioning, wolfing down their lunches, crushing scores of water bottles and achieving wall-to-wall media coverage with their spirited performance, what did they achieve? Rather embarrassingly, it seems precious little.
Aside from a posse of hardcore KMT supporters outside the Legislative Yuan, wider public support was conspicuous in its absence.
KMT Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) has promised that the occupation was “just the beginning.”
Excellent. Please organize a similar occupation, preferably one for each legislative session. Your comically inept political stunts will greatly add to the gaiety of the nation. Keep up the good work.
Ku Pang-yu is a resident of Miaoli County
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS