It seems that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus has finally learned how to discharge its duties as a diligent and conscientious opposition party.
On Sunday last week, KMT legislators barricaded themselves inside the Legislative Yuan’s main chamber in protest against the government’s nomination of former Presidential Office secretary-general Chen Chu (陳菊) to head the Control Yuan.
The lawmakers appeared fortified with an unshakeable will. They chanted in unison: “We won’t end the occupation until we achieve our goal.”
The public watched in trepidation and said: “These fellas look serious.”
“But, hold on a minute — how come there’s no air-conditioning? It’s getting really stuffy in here,” soon sounded from the legislative chamber.
Emulating the tactics of the 2014 Sunflower movement, KMT caucus whip Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) went outside to speak to the press.
The occupation had no time limit — the longer the better, Lin said, but added: Ideally it would last three days and three nights.
Oh, and by the way, would the government mind turning on the lights and air-conditioning? Lin asked, adding that pan-blue camp legislators would otherwise need to leave the legislative chamber.
After the torment of a hot and stuffy night, on Monday morning last week, power was finally restored. As the lights flickered back on, glorious waves of mechanically cooled air soothed the fevered brows of KMT legislators.
Then at noon, after a grand total of 19 hours, the occupation ended and KMT legislators were munching their boxed lunches.
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislative Speaker You Si-kun (游錫堃) announced that he would convene a cross-party discussion, KMT lawmakers interrupted him by banging water bottles on desks and shouting slogans to indicate their strong opposition.
What a sight to behold: The awe-inspiring righteousness of the KMT lawmakers will doubtless inspire generations to come.
Contrast the KMT’s tokenistic occupation with the Sunflower movement, which was a true grassroots movement initiated by student activists and civic groups. During their occupation of the Executive Yuan in 2014, the protesters managed to hold out for almost 23 days without water or electricity and under pressure from the far superior strength of the police. All supplies to keep them going were donated by members of the public. After the occupation, 17 people were arrested and charged, such as Dennis Wei (魏揚), who received a four-month jail sentence.
The Sunflower movement fills the pages of history books, while the KMT’s occupation might be nothing more than a footnote. What about their demands?
After enjoying the air- conditioning, wolfing down their lunches, crushing scores of water bottles and achieving wall-to-wall media coverage with their spirited performance, what did they achieve? Rather embarrassingly, it seems precious little.
Aside from a posse of hardcore KMT supporters outside the Legislative Yuan, wider public support was conspicuous in its absence.
KMT Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) has promised that the occupation was “just the beginning.”
Excellent. Please organize a similar occupation, preferably one for each legislative session. Your comically inept political stunts will greatly add to the gaiety of the nation. Keep up the good work.
Ku Pang-yu is a resident of Miaoli County
Translated by Edward Jones
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS