British voters’ ruthless rejection of Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and his radical socialist project reads like a cautionary tale for left-wing political leaders and parties in the US and Europe.
Will Labour’s crushing defeat in the British elections on Thursday last week dim their ardor, or will they double down on revolution?
The British general election outcome would embolden Democratic Party critics of US Senator Bernie Sanders, a US presidential hopeful for next year’s elections whose outlook has often been likened to Corbyn’s.
Illustration: Mountain People
Both men are veteran hard-left campaigners with strong appeal among younger, post-economic crash voters.
Sanders is running well behind former US vice president Joe Biden, the main centrist candidate, in most Democratic primary polls, and is vying for second place with another left-winger, US Senator Elizabeth Warren.
That has led to speculation about a combined Sanders-Warren leftist “dream ticket.”
Yet national surveys of voting intentions show Sanders beating US President Donald Trump in November next year by an average of 8.4 points. Biden’s equivalent predicted winning margin is 9.8 points. Warren could win, too, the polls suggest. At present, Sanders has no reason to bow out.
Skeptics argue that despite these figures, Sanders cannot win next year.
Once voters take a close look at his and Warren’s ideas about universal, British National Health Service-style healthcare provision, business taxes, immigration and workers’ rights, the critics say, they will shy away, as was the case with Corbyn.
Supporters of Sanders and Warren insist that the opposite is the case.
Corbyn-like, they say they offer voters a chance to change a system that is “rigged” against ordinary working families.
Sanders calls this “democratic socialism.” Detractors call it “welfarism.”
Corbyn’s relative success in the UK’s 2017 election was seen as inspirational by some on the US left.
Writing in the Nation in April, Robert Borosage was full of optimism about the year ahead.
“The coming British and US elections could mark not simply a change of the party in power, but the end of the 40-year conservative era and the beginning of a reform era,” Borosage wrote in a commentary headlined: “Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn might create a Revolution.”
That fantasy is punctured now. Even before Labour’s meltdown, the palpable fear in Democrat circles was that by offering radical reform, rather than simply a safe, mainstream replacement for Trump, the party could forfeit a historic opportunity — and let Trump back in. Labour faced the same dilemma — and missed an open goal.
The grassroots Democratic Party, like Labour, has moved further left in the past few years. Former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton’s narrow loss in 2016 was seen on the left as a defeat for discredited notions about where the political center really lies, and what people really want.
This ideological battle might intensify following the decision of Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former New York City mayor, to enter the race.
Biden was quick to wade in on Friday, saying: “Look what happens when the Labour Party moves so, so far to the left.”
While Trump would probably relish a one-on-one fight with Sanders or Warren, Republicans worry that Biden and potentially Bloomberg could more easily win over the white, working-class voters on whom the election will hinge and who in the UK defected to the Conservatives in decisive numbers.
As they reflect on Labour’s failure, European left-wing parties are likely to draw a distinction between Corbyn and his policy platform.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that personal dislike and distrust of Corbyn on the economy, national security and Brexit were big negative factors.
In contrast, Labour advocates insist Corbyn’s ideas about a fairer, more equal society serving “the many not the few,” the ending of austerity, and new funding for health, social care and education were popular on the doorstep. These issues resonate across post-2008 Europe, too.
However, while Europe’s social democrats have made a comeback this year, finding an unabashedly socialist party that enjoys sole power is a big ask in Europe these days.
Europe’s right-wing populists — former Italian deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini, Marine Le Pen’s National Rally in France, Germany’s Alternative for Germany, and the ruling parties in Poland and Hungary — will meanwhile enjoy the British left’s electoral debacle.
The hard right did not do as well as it hoped in last summer’s EU parliamentary elections. However, at national and regional level, it is formidable and gaining.
The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SDP) faces a particular dilemma. With support at record lows, the party recently picked two left-wingers as joint leaders in a bid to renew itself. Now the SDP must be wondering if it has voted for extinction.
The EU itself is maintaining its usual, lofty neutrality. However, centrist leaders, such as French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, would be concerned by the example set by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s brazenly populist campaign, and what a buoyant right-wing government in London will mean not only for Brexit, but for overall relations.
The stand-out success of the Scottish National Party, presaging a possible constitutional clash with Westminster over a second referendum on Scottish independence, is another potential worry for the EU. An independent Scotland seeking instant membership would be an embarrassment and Brussels certainly does not want another Catalonia.
Crowing and self-congratulation on the right has already started in the US, with suggestions that Johnson has provided a signpost to a Trump second term, in part by persuading long-standing opposition voters to switch sides.
“For the US, the British results are profoundly encouraging,” Fox News commentator Theodore Bromund said. “Britain should now be able to get Brexit done by the new deadline of Jan. 31. This, in turn, means that Britain and the US will be able to negotiate a free-trade area in the near future.”
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic
RSS